Enrique Segura
P Hub City Spartanburgers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19 | MIX2 levels | 16 | 15 | 75 | 5.76 | 4.23 | 22.0% | 11.4% | — | K 15.7% · BB 13.8% · FIP 5.37 |
| 2025 | 20 | MIX2 levels | 22 | 18 | 92 | 4.61 | 2.93 | 24.2% | 8.1% | — | K 16.9% · BB 10.2% · FIP 4.12 |
| 2026 | 21 | A+TEX | 22 | 20 | 75 | 6.57 | 6.29 | 21.4% | 16.1% | — | K 16.5% · BB 18.5% · FIP 7.48 |
| 2027PROJ | 22 | MLBTEX | — | — | 0 | 5.96 | 5.96 | 17.4% | 15.5% | — | |
| 2028PROJ49% MLB | 23 | MLBTEX | 9 | 9 | 48 | 5.72 | 5.59 | 19.7% | 13.4% | -0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ70% MLB | 24 | MLBTEX | 13 | 13 | 75 | 5.41 | 5.26 | 21.1% | 12.1% | 0.2 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Phillies Red | 13 | 8 | 43 | 179 | 39 | 22 | 1 | 62% | 3.3 | 14.8% | 15.4% | -0.5% | 0.7% | 2.32 | 4.16 | — |
| 2022 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Phillies Red | 13 | 8 | 43 | 179 | 39 | 22 | 1 | 62% | 3.3 | 21.8% | 12.3% | 9.5% | 0.6% | 2.32 | 3.12 | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Phillies | 11 | 10 | 37 | 170 | 33 | 29 | 4 | 91% | 3.3 | 13.2% | 21.3% | -8.1% | 3.2% | 6.87 | 6.44 | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK RAW | FCL Phillies | 11 | 10 | 37 | 170 | 33 | 29 | 4 | 91% | 3.3 | 19.4% | 17.1% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 6.87 | 5.09 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 15 | 75 | 332 | 73 | 38 | 9 | 94% | 4.7 | 15.7% | 13.8% | 2.0% | 3.4% | 5.76 | 5.37 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 15 | 75 | 332 | 73 | 38 | 9 | 94% | 4.7 | 15.7% | 13.8% | 2.0% | 3.4% | 5.76 | 5.37 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 16 | 15 | 75 | 332 | 73 | 38 | 9 | 94% | 4.7 | 22.0% | 11.4% | 10.5% | 2.7% | 5.76 | 4.23 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 18 | 92 | 393 | 95 | 32 | 6 | 82% | 4.2 | 16.9% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 2.1% | 4.61 | 4.12 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 18 | 92 | 393 | 95 | 32 | 6 | 82% | 4.2 | 16.9% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 2.1% | 4.61 | 4.12 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 22 | 18 | 92 | 393 | 95 | 32 | 6 | 82% | 4.2 | 24.2% | 8.1% | 16.0% | 1.5% | 4.61 | 2.93 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ MLE | Hub City Spartanburgers | 22 | 20 | 75 | 341 | 73 | 55 | 17 | 91% | 3.4 | 16.5% | 18.5% | -2.1% | 6.2% | 6.57 | 7.48 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ MLE | Hub City Spartanburgers | 22 | 20 | 75 | 341 | 73 | 55 | 17 | 91% | 3.4 | 16.5% | 18.5% | -2.1% | 6.2% | 6.57 | 7.48 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ RAW | Hub City Spartanburgers | 22 | 20 | 75 | 341 | 73 | 55 | 17 | 91% | 3.4 | 21.4% | 16.1% | 5.3% | 5.0% | 6.57 | 6.29 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB | TEX | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.4% | 15.5% | 1.9% | 3.6% | 5.96 | 5.96 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | TEX | 18 | 18 | 97 | 408 | 80 | 55 | 14 | 100% | 5.4 | 19.7% | 13.4% | 6.2% | 3.5% | 5.58 | 5.45 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB MLE | TEX | 19 | 19 | 107 | 452 | 95 | 55 | 16 | 100% | 5.6 | 21.1% | 12.1% | 8.9% | 3.4% | 5.27 | 5.12 | +0.3 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB MLE | TEX | 20 | 20 | 115 | 486 | 106 | 55 | 17 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.9% | 11.3% | 10.6% | 3.4% | 5.05 | 4.93 | +0.6 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB MLE | TEX | 19 | 19 | 115 | 484 | 108 | 54 | 16 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.4% | 11.2% | 11.2% | 3.4% | 4.93 | 4.87 | +0.7 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB MLE | TEX | 19 | 19 | 111 | 470 | 105 | 53 | 16 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.3% | 11.2% | 11.1% | 3.4% | 4.91 | 4.90 | +0.6 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB MLE | TEX | 18 | 18 | 106 | 448 | 100 | 51 | 16 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.2% | 11.4% | 10.8% | 3.5% | 4.96 | 4.99 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB MLE | TEX | 16 | 16 | 99 | 418 | 92 | 49 | 15 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.0% | 11.6% | 10.4% | 3.7% | 5.06 | 5.12 | +0.3 |
| 2035 | 30 | MLB MLE | TEX | 15 | 15 | 90 | 381 | 82 | 45 | 15 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.6% | 11.9% | 9.7% | 3.9% | 5.20 | 5.30 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | TEX | 9 | 9 | 48 | 203 | 40 | 27 | 8 | 100% | 5.3 | 19.7% | 13.4% | 6.2% | 3.8% | 5.72 | 5.59 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB CTX | TEX | 13 | 13 | 75 | 317 | 67 | 38 | 12 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.1% | 12.1% | 8.9% | 3.7% | 5.41 | 5.26 | +0.2 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB CTX | TEX | 16 | 16 | 93 | 393 | 86 | 44 | 14 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.9% | 11.3% | 10.6% | 3.7% | 5.19 | 5.07 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB CTX | TEX | 17 | 17 | 100 | 422 | 94 | 47 | 15 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.4% | 11.2% | 11.2% | 3.6% | 5.07 | 5.01 | +0.6 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB CTX | TEX | 17 | 17 | 101 | 426 | 95 | 48 | 16 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.3% | 11.2% | 11.1% | 3.7% | 5.05 | 5.04 | +0.6 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB CTX | TEX | 16 | 16 | 98 | 414 | 92 | 47 | 16 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.2% | 11.4% | 10.8% | 3.8% | 5.11 | 5.14 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB CTX | TEX | 15 | 15 | 92 | 388 | 85 | 45 | 15 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.0% | 11.6% | 10.4% | 4.0% | 5.21 | 5.27 | +0.3 |
| 2035 | 30 | MLB CTX | TEX | 14 | 14 | 84 | 355 | 77 | 42 | 15 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.6% | 11.9% | 9.7% | 4.2% | 5.36 | 5.46 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 117 | 117 | 691 | 2918 | 636 | 339 | 111 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.8% | 11.6% | 10.2% | 3.8% | 5.23 | 4.82 | +4.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 184 | 98 | 32 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.8% | 11.6% | 10.2% | 3.8% | 5.23 | 4.82 | +1.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 84 | 71 | 321 | 1415 | 224 | 213 | 47 | 85% | 3.8 | 15.8% | 15.0% | 0.8% | 3.3% | 5.29 | 5.50 | +3.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 52 | 44 | 200 | 881 | 139 | 132 | 29 | 85% | 3.8 | 15.8% | 15.0% | 0.8% | 3.3% | 5.29 | 5.50 | +0.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Hub City Spartanburgers · 75 IPFIP 6.07 → 7.48 (+1.41)K% 21.4% → 16.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.41% | — | ×0.770 | 16.48% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.13% | — | ×1.150 | 18.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.99% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 6.23% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 6.07 → 7.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AHickory Crawdads · 83 IPFIP 3.18 → 4.12 (+0.93)K% 22.9% → 16.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.91% | — | ×0.740 | 16.95% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.66% | — | ×1.180 | 10.22% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.68% | ÷1.037 | ×1.300 | 2.10% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 3.18 → 4.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKACL Rangers · 8 IPFIP 0.33 → 1.42 (+1.09)K% 37.1% → 25.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.14% | — | ×0.680 | 25.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.86% | — | ×1.250 | 3.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.302 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 160).
Result: FIP 0.33 → 1.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AClearwater Threshers · 43 IPFIP 4.95 → 6.06 (+1.11)K% 21.6% → 16.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.65% | — | ×0.740 | 16.02% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.40% | — | ×1.180 | 15.81% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.61% | ÷1.115 | ×1.300 | 4.21% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 123).
Result: FIP 4.95 → 6.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Phillies · 32 IPFIP 3.10 → 4.39 (+1.29)K% 22.5% → 15.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.46% | — | ×0.680 | 15.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.70% | — | ×1.250 | 10.87% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.45% | ÷0.924 | ×1.400 | 2.20% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 3.10 → 4.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Phillies · 37 IPFIP 4.91 → 6.44 (+1.53)K% 19.4% → 13.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.41% | — | ×0.680 | 13.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.06% | — | ×1.250 | 21.32% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.35% | ÷1.028 | ×1.400 | 3.20% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 106).
Result: FIP 4.91 → 6.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL Phillies Red · 43 IPFIP 3.12 → 4.16 (+1.03)K% 21.8% → 14.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.79% | — | ×0.680 | 14.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.29% | — | ×1.250 | 15.36% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.56% | ÷1.187 | ×1.400 | 0.66% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 137).
Result: FIP 3.12 → 4.16, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 4.7 | 103 | 21.3% | 12.1% | 1.37 | 5.19 |
| Jason Bere ('03) | 5.6 | 123 | 18.4% | 12.6% | 1.17 | 5.14 |
| Jeff Robinson ('87-'92, 0 WAR*) | 3.5 | 118 | 18.3%* | 10.9%* | 1.38* | 5.14* |
| Tim Lollar ('80-'86, 3 WAR*) | 4.5 | 129 | 21.2%* | 12.2%* | 1.35* | 4.94* |
| Ken Kravec ('75-'82, 5 WAR*) | 4.3 | 123 | 23.6%* | 10.7%* | 1.11* | 4.73* |
| John Maine ('13) | 3.0 | 99 | 19.5% | 10.5% | 1.23 | 4.45 |
| Matt Beech ('98) | 1.5 | 98 | 20.2% | 10.0% | 1.59 | 5.37 |