Marcos Herrera
P Fresno Grizzlies| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19 | ROKCOL | 12 | 6 | 44 | 5.77 | 3.83 | 19.2% | 13.8% | — | K 13.1% · BB 17.2% · FIP 4.91 |
| 2025 | 20 | ACOL | 21 | 19 | 101 | 3.93 | 3.69 | 23.2% | 12.0% | — | K 17.2% · BB 14.2% · FIP 4.94 |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX2 levels | 26 | 23 | 96 | 8.81 | 5.69 | 20.1% | 14.4% | — | K 14.5% · BB 17.2% · FIP 6.69 |
| 2027PROJ | 22 | MLBCOL | — | — | 0 | 5.94 | 5.94 | 17.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 2028PROJ35% MLB | 23 | MLBCOL | 6 | 6 | 33 | 5.83 | 5.69 | 19.8% | 14.5% | -0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ54% MLB | 24 | MLBCOL | 10 | 10 | 57 | 5.52 | 5.37 | 21.1% | 13.1% | 0.2 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rockies | 11 | 8 | 34 | 142 | 29 | 15 | 5 | 73% | 3.1 | 13.9% | 13.2% | 0.7% | 4.0% | 4.24 | 5.79 | — |
| 2022 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Rockies | 11 | 8 | 34 | 142 | 29 | 15 | 5 | 73% | 3.1 | 20.4% | 10.6% | 9.9% | 3.5% | 4.24 | 4.63 | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Colorado | 11 | 9 | 44 | 193 | 38 | 16 | 1 | 82% | 4.0 | 13.4% | 10.4% | 3.0% | 0.6% | 4.74 | 3.63 | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Colorado | 11 | 9 | 44 | 193 | 38 | 16 | 1 | 82% | 4.0 | 19.7% | 8.3% | 11.4% | 0.5% | 4.74 | 2.76 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL Rockies | 12 | 6 | 44 | 203 | 39 | 28 | 2 | 50% | 3.6 | 13.1% | 17.2% | -4.2% | 1.3% | 5.77 | 4.91 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL Rockies | 12 | 6 | 44 | 203 | 39 | 28 | 2 | 50% | 3.6 | 13.1% | 17.2% | -4.2% | 1.3% | 5.77 | 4.91 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK RAW | ACL Rockies | 12 | 6 | 44 | 203 | 39 | 28 | 2 | 50% | 3.6 | 19.2% | 13.8% | 5.4% | 1.0% | 5.77 | 3.83 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | 21 | 19 | 101 | 440 | 102 | 53 | 8 | 90% | 4.8 | 17.2% | 14.2% | 2.9% | 2.7% | 3.93 | 4.94 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | 21 | 19 | 101 | 440 | 102 | 53 | 8 | 90% | 4.8 | 17.2% | 14.2% | 2.9% | 2.7% | 3.93 | 4.94 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A RAW | Fresno Grizzlies | 21 | 19 | 101 | 440 | 102 | 53 | 8 | 90% | 4.8 | 23.2% | 12.0% | 11.1% | 1.8% | 3.93 | 3.69 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 23 | 96 | 493 | 99 | 71 | 18 | 88% | 3.7 | 14.5% | 17.2% | -2.7% | 4.8% | 8.81 | 6.69 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 23 | 96 | 493 | 99 | 71 | 18 | 88% | 3.7 | 14.5% | 17.2% | -2.7% | 4.8% | 8.81 | 6.69 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 23 | 96 | 493 | 99 | 71 | 18 | 88% | 3.7 | 20.1% | 14.4% | 5.7% | 3.7% | 8.81 | 5.69 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB | COL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.6% | 16.8% | 0.8% | 3.3% | 5.94 | 5.94 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | COL | 18 | 18 | 96 | 403 | 80 | 59 | 13 | 100% | 5.3 | 19.8% | 14.5% | 5.3% | 3.2% | 5.56 | 5.42 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB MLE | COL | 19 | 19 | 106 | 446 | 94 | 58 | 14 | 100% | 5.6 | 21.1% | 13.1% | 8.1% | 3.2% | 5.25 | 5.10 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB MLE | COL | 19 | 19 | 113 | 478 | 105 | 58 | 15 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.0% | 12.2% | 9.8% | 3.2% | 5.02 | 4.90 | +0.6 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB MLE | COL | 19 | 19 | 113 | 475 | 107 | 57 | 15 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.4% | 12.0% | 10.4% | 3.2% | 4.91 | 4.84 | +0.7 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB MLE | COL | 18 | 18 | 110 | 462 | 104 | 56 | 15 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.4% | 12.1% | 10.3% | 3.2% | 4.89 | 4.88 | +0.7 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB MLE | COL | 17 | 17 | 104 | 441 | 98 | 54 | 15 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.3% | 12.2% | 10.0% | 3.3% | 4.93 | 4.96 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB MLE | COL | 16 | 16 | 97 | 411 | 91 | 51 | 14 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.0% | 12.5% | 9.6% | 3.5% | 5.03 | 5.09 | +0.3 |
| 2035 | 30 | MLB MLE | COL | 15 | 15 | 89 | 375 | 81 | 48 | 14 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.7% | 12.8% | 8.9% | 3.7% | 5.17 | 5.27 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | COL | 6 | 6 | 33 | 139 | 28 | 20 | 5 | 100% | 5.5 | 19.8% | 14.5% | 5.3% | 3.7% | 5.83 | 5.69 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB CTX | COL | 10 | 10 | 57 | 241 | 51 | 31 | 9 | 100% | 5.7 | 21.1% | 13.1% | 8.1% | 3.7% | 5.52 | 5.37 | +0.2 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB CTX | COL | 13 | 13 | 76 | 321 | 70 | 39 | 12 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.0% | 12.2% | 9.8% | 3.6% | 5.28 | 5.16 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB CTX | COL | 14 | 14 | 86 | 363 | 81 | 44 | 13 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.4% | 12.0% | 10.4% | 3.6% | 5.17 | 5.10 | +0.6 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB CTX | COL | 15 | 15 | 89 | 376 | 84 | 45 | 14 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.4% | 12.1% | 10.3% | 3.7% | 5.16 | 5.15 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB CTX | COL | 15 | 15 | 89 | 376 | 84 | 46 | 14 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.3% | 12.2% | 10.0% | 3.8% | 5.21 | 5.24 | +0.4 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB CTX | COL | 14 | 14 | 85 | 359 | 79 | 45 | 14 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.0% | 12.5% | 9.6% | 4.0% | 5.32 | 5.38 | +0.3 |
| 2035 | 30 | MLB CTX | COL | 13 | 13 | 79 | 334 | 72 | 43 | 14 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.7% | 12.8% | 8.9% | 4.2% | 5.48 | 5.58 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 101 | 101 | 594 | 2508 | 550 | 313 | 95 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.9% | 12.5% | 9.4% | 3.8% | 5.32 | 4.92 | +3.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 185 | 105 | 32 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.9% | 12.5% | 9.4% | 3.8% | 5.32 | 4.92 | +1.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 81 | 65 | 318 | 1471 | 219 | 221 | 45 | 80% | 3.9 | 14.9% | 15.0% | -0.1% | 3.1% | 5.80 | 5.43 | +3.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 51 | 41 | 200 | 925 | 138 | 139 | 28 | 80% | 3.9 | 14.9% | 15.0% | -0.1% | 3.1% | 5.80 | 5.43 | +0.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AFresno Grizzlies · 74 IPFIP 5.50 → 6.87 (+1.37)K% 18.4% → 13.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.41% | — | ×0.740 | 13.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.58% | — | ×1.180 | 17.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.84% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 4.99% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.50 → 6.87, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKACL Rockies · 22 IPFIP 4.22 → 6.01 (+1.80)K% 26.5% → 18.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.47% | — | ×0.680 | 18.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.73% | — | ×1.250 | 17.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.94% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 4.12% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.22 → 6.01, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AFresno Grizzlies · 101 IPFIP 3.67 → 4.94 (+1.28)K% 23.2% → 17.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.18% | — | ×0.740 | 17.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.05% | — | ×1.180 | 14.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.82% | ÷0.870 | ×1.300 | 2.72% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 74).
Result: FIP 3.67 → 4.94, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKACL Rockies · 44 IPFIP 3.77 → 4.91 (+1.14)K% 19.2% → 13.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.21% | — | ×0.680 | 13.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.79% | — | ×1.250 | 17.24% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.99% | ÷1.044 | ×1.400 | 1.32% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 3.77 → 4.91, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Colorado · 44 IPFIP 2.77 → 3.63 (+0.86)K% 19.7% → 13.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.69% | — | ×0.680 | 13.39% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.29% | — | ×1.250 | 10.36% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.52% | ÷1.146 | ×1.400 | 0.63% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 129).
Result: FIP 2.77 → 3.63, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL Rockies · 34 IPFIP 4.65 → 5.79 (+1.15)K% 20.4% → 13.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.42% | — | ×0.680 | 13.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.56% | — | ×1.250 | 13.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.52% | ÷1.233 | ×1.400 | 4.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 147).
Result: FIP 4.65 → 5.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 4.6 | 102 | 21.3% | 13.0% | 1.27 | 5.17 |
| Jason Bere ('03) | 5.6 | 123 | 18.4% | 12.6% | 1.17 | 5.14 |
| Kazuhisa Ishii ('02-'05, 1 WAR*) | 2.8 | 141 | 19.8%* | 13.6%* | 1.14* | 4.72* |
| Les Cain ('68-'72, 2 WAR*) | 1.9 | 93 | 24.6%* | 12.9%* | 1.00* | 4.66* |
| Tim Lollar ('80-'86, 3 WAR*) | 4.5 | 129 | 21.2%* | 12.2%* | 1.35* | 4.94* |
| Jeff Robinson ('87-'92, 0 WAR*) | 3.5 | 118 | 18.3%* | 10.9%* | 1.38* | 5.14* |
| John Maine ('13) | 3.0 | 99 | 19.5% | 10.5% | 1.23 | 4.45 |