Kyle McCoy
P Dayton Dragons| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 23 | 17 | 90 | 5.20 | 3.63 | 22.3% | 10.3% | — | K 17.0% · BB 11.9% · FIP 4.53 |
| 2027PROJ | 23 | MLBCIN | — | — | 0 | 4.99 | 4.99 | 18.2% | 11.6% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 24 | MLBCIN | 5 | 5 | 29 | 4.94 | 4.86 | 19.6% | 10.5% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ66% MLB | 25 | MLBCIN | 7 | 7 | 41 | 4.78 | 4.71 | 20.3% | 9.9% | 0.4 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 17 | 90 | 408 | 91 | 42 | 8 | 74% | 3.9 | 17.0% | 11.9% | 5.1% | 2.5% | 5.20 | 4.53 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 17 | 90 | 408 | 91 | 42 | 8 | 74% | 3.9 | 17.0% | 11.9% | 5.1% | 2.5% | 5.20 | 4.53 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 17 | 90 | 408 | 91 | 42 | 8 | 74% | 3.9 | 22.3% | 10.3% | 12.0% | 2.0% | 5.20 | 3.63 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB | CIN | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.2% | 11.6% | 6.6% | 2.9% | 4.99 | 4.99 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | CIN | 12 | 12 | 67 | 282 | 55 | 30 | 8 | 100% | 5.6 | 19.6% | 10.5% | 9.0% | 2.9% | 4.81 | 4.73 | +0.5 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | CIN | 11 | 11 | 62 | 261 | 53 | 26 | 7 | 100% | 5.6 | 20.3% | 9.9% | 10.5% | 2.9% | 4.65 | 4.58 | +0.6 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | CIN | 10 | 10 | 60 | 255 | 53 | 25 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.7% | 9.7% | 11.0% | 2.9% | 4.57 | 4.53 | +0.6 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | CIN | 10 | 10 | 59 | 247 | 51 | 24 | 7 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.8% | 9.7% | 11.0% | 2.9% | 4.56 | 4.56 | +0.6 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | CIN | 9 | 9 | 56 | 235 | 48 | 23 | 7 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.6% | 9.9% | 10.7% | 3.0% | 4.61 | 4.64 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | CIN | 9 | 9 | 57 | 239 | 53 | 22 | 8 | 100% | 6.3 | 22.4% | 9.3% | 13.1% | 3.2% | 4.55 | 4.51 | +0.6 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB MLE | CIN | 8 | 8 | 51 | 215 | 47 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 6.4 | 22.0% | 9.6% | 12.4% | 3.4% | 4.63 | 4.68 | +0.4 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB MLE | CIN | 8 | 8 | 45 | 190 | 41 | 19 | 7 | 100% | 5.6 | 21.6% | 10.0% | 11.7% | 3.6% | 4.78 | 4.88 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | CIN | 5 | 5 | 29 | 122 | 24 | 13 | 4 | 100% | 5.8 | 19.6% | 10.5% | 9.0% | 3.1% | 4.94 | 4.86 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | CIN | 7 | 7 | 41 | 173 | 35 | 17 | 5 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.3% | 9.9% | 10.5% | 3.1% | 4.78 | 4.71 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | CIN | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 42 | 20 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.7% | 9.7% | 11.0% | 3.1% | 4.70 | 4.66 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | CIN | 8 | 8 | 50 | 211 | 44 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.8% | 9.7% | 11.0% | 3.1% | 4.69 | 4.69 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | CIN | 8 | 8 | 49 | 207 | 43 | 20 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.6% | 9.9% | 10.7% | 3.3% | 4.74 | 4.77 | +0.4 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | CIN | 8 | 8 | 51 | 215 | 48 | 20 | 7 | 100% | 6.4 | 22.4% | 9.3% | 13.1% | 3.4% | 4.69 | 4.65 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB CTX | CIN | 8 | 8 | 47 | 198 | 44 | 19 | 7 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.0% | 9.6% | 12.4% | 3.6% | 4.78 | 4.83 | +0.4 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB CTX | CIN | 7 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 38 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.6% | 10.0% | 11.7% | 3.9% | 4.94 | 5.04 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 60 | 60 | 358 | 1510 | 318 | 148 | 50 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.1% | 9.8% | 11.3% | 3.3% | 4.77 | 4.38 | +4.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 178 | 83 | 28 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.1% | 9.8% | 11.3% | 3.3% | 4.77 | 4.38 | +2.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 23 | 17 | 90 | 408 | 69 | 49 | 10 | 74% | 3.9 | 17.0% | 11.9% | 5.1% | 2.5% | 5.20 | 4.53 | +4.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 51 | 38 | 200 | 907 | 154 | 108 | 22 | 74% | 3.9 | 17.0% | 11.9% | 5.1% | 2.5% | 5.20 | 4.53 | +1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Dayton Dragons · 66 IPFIP 3.58 → 4.48 (+0.90)K% 22.3% → 17.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.33% | — | ×0.770 | 17.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×1.150 | 11.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 2.50% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.58 → 4.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ADaytona Tortugas · 24 IPFIP 3.65 → 4.69 (+1.05)K% 22.2% → 16.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.22% | — | ×0.740 | 16.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.11% | — | ×1.180 | 13.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.85% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 2.41% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.65 → 4.69, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.6 | 58 | 20.6% | 10.1% | 1.17 | 4.69 |
| Dan Miceli ('06) | 3.5 | 64 | 20.6% | 10.1% | 1.19 | 4.48 |
| Buck Farmer ('24) | 2.6 | 51 | 21.6% | 10.5% | 1.24 | 4.71 |
| Josias Manzanillo ('04) | 1.7 | 57 | 20.0% | 10.2% | 1.21 | 4.71 |
| Bill Scherrer ('82-'88, 1 WAR*) | 1.6 | 62 | 20.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.19* | 4.44* |
| Jerry Don Gleaton ('79-'92, 2 WAR*) | 2.2 | 64 | 19.4%* | 10.2%* | 1.05* | 4.44* |
| Bill Pleis ('61-'66, -0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 56 | 19.7%* | 9.8%* | 1.15* | 4.53* |