Gio Cueto

C Great Lakes Loons
Age 24 R/R 5'10" / 180 lbs A+ HR +8%BB -8% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2036
Overview
A+PROSPECTMiLBFA 2037
OGV OFP35OGV rank#1708ETA2029MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202522A+/A2 orgs138.250/.387/.3121257—.204/.314/.255
202623A+/ROKLAD112.244/.376/.4786076—.188/.285/.333
2027PROJMLE24MLBLAD200.213/.287/.32541740.1
2028PROJ30% MLB25MLBLAD33.212/.287/.32910770.0
2029PROJ44% MLB26MLBLAD73.214/.289/.33520790.1
Next 3 projected WAR 0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2036Service0.0First FA2037
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029MiLB2030MiLB2031Pre-Arb$0.9M2032Pre-Arb$0.9M2033Ext$0.9M2034Ext$3M+2
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2026 A+
Z-Con%72
BB%71
ISO69
Chase%66
wOBA61
wRC+59
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 98%
CompsAndrew Susac (age 24) · Dusty Brown (age 24) · Jaxx Groshans (age 24)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONpark-neutral Marcel · 63 proj PA
wRC+†74
AVG/OBP/SLG.211 / .285 / .322
PA63
HR1
K%29
BB%8
ISO112
MLB%0%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -1.9 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-2BATRUN: -0.1 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)-0RUNFLD: +0.0 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)+0FLDPOS: +1.1 runs (Positional adjustment)+1POSREP: +1.4 runs (Replacement-level credit)+1REPTotal WAR: +0.10+0.1WAR
0.00.51.00.00.10.20.10.127282930313233343536
━ projected WAR━ paid WAR ($/8M) surplus deficit+$2M ctrl surplus
Tools · Contract
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2031
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2036
First FA Year   2037
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2031
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2031
2029MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2031
2030MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2031
2031Pre-Arb$0.9M+0.1$0.3M+$0.0M (cut)
2032Pre-Arb$0.9M+0.1$0.3M+$0.0M (cut)
2033Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2034Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2035Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2036Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $0.0M $0.6M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202522 A+Great Lakes Loons — 2824 4000 351 00 167286167452 211 1811 230 13 — — — — — —
202522 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes — 11088 24401 17314 20 273413352765 80411 2815 356 68 — — — — — —
202623 A+Great Lakes Loons — 8568 16104 12222 01 235366426792 191279 2614 346 73 — — — — — —
202623 ROKACL Dodgers — 2722 6202 461 00 2734076361.044 364286 2215 447 87 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202522 A+ MLEGreat Lakes Loons — 2825 4000 261 00 160250160410 196 217 187 13 — — — — — —
202522 A MLERancho Cucamonga Quakes — 11093 20301 12434 20 215330280610 65367 3911 269 68 — — — — — —
202623 A+ MLEGreat Lakes Loons — 8572 14103 8282 01 194293333626 139237 339 276 73 — — — — — —
202623 ROK MLEACL Dodgers — 2724 4101 291 00 167259333593 167205 337 297 87 — — — — — —
202522 A MLE2 teams — 138118 24301 14495 20 203314254568 51338 3610 252 57 — — — — — —
202522 A RAW2 teams — 138112 28401 20365 20 250387312699 62360 2614 331 57 — — — — — —
202623 A+ MLE2 teams — 11295 18205 11373 01 189294368662 179241 3310 281 76 — — — — — —
202623 A+ RAW2 teams — 11290 22306 16283 01 244376478854 233281 2514 370 76 — — — — — —
202522 A MLE2 teams — 138118 24301 14495 20 203314254568 51332 3610 252 57 — — — — — —
202623 A+ MLE2 teams — 11297 18205 11373 01 186294361654 175229 3310 281 76 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202522 A MLE2 teams — 138118 24301 14495 20 203314254568 51332 3610 252 57 — — — — — —
202623 A+ MLE2 teams — 11297 18205 11373 01 186294361654 175229 3310 281 76 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202724 MLB MLELAD 0% 200179 38614 16583 10 213287325613 112289 298 278 74 -6 +0 +0 +4 +4 0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202825 MLB MLELAD 30% 10896 22412 9312 00 216290333623 117289 298 282 77 -3 +0 +0 +2 +2 0.1
202926 MLB MLELAD 44% 166150 33614 13472 10 218292339631 122289 288 285 79 -4 +0 +0 +3 +4 0.3
203027 MLB MLELAD 49% 210188 41715 17593 10 218292340632 122289 288 285 79 -5 +0 +0 +4 +5 0.3
203128 MLB MLELAD 52% 242217 47815 20683 11 218292339630 121288 288 285 79 -6 -0 -1 +4 +5 0.3
203229 MLB MLELAD 51% 258232 51916 21733 11 217290336626 119286 288 283 78 -7 -0 -1 +5 +6 0.2
202825 MLB CTXLAD 30% 3330 6101 390 00 212287329616 116283 279 279 77 -1 +0 +0 +1 +1 0.0
202926 MLB CTXLAD 44% 7366 14202 6211 00 214289335624 121283 298 282 79 -2 +0 +0 +1 +2 0.1
203027 MLB CTXLAD 49% 10393 19302 8291 00 215289336625 121282 288 283 79 -3 +0 +0 +2 +2 0.2
203128 MLB CTXLAD 52% 125112 24403 10352 00 214288335623 120282 288 282 79 -3 +0 -0 +2 +3 0.1
203229 MLB CTXLAD 51% 133119 26413 11372 00 213287332619 119280 288 280 78 -4 +0 -1 +2 +3 0.1
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 467420 8914111 381316 00 212287329615 117278 288 281 76 -12 +0 -1 +8 +10 0.6
/ 162G— A+C — 650585 12319115 531828 00 210285323608 113276 288 281 76 -17 +0 -2 +12 +14 0.8
Career— MLE — 12971153 24741529 11038222 63 214295334629 120291 298 280 76 -27 +0 -2 +19 +23 1.2
/ 162G— MLE — 650578 12521315 5519111 32 216297341637 125293 298 280 76 -17 +0 -1 +12 +14 0.8

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 A+Great Lakes Loons · 85 PAwOBA .341 → .276 (−66)K% 25.9% → 32.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA25.88%÷1.000×1.270——32.87%
BB% (unintentional) /PA14.12%÷1.000×0.710—×0.99810.00%
HBP% /PA2.35%—×0.790—×0.9981.86%
Singles /BIP23.91%÷1.000×0.920×0.952×0.99820.90%
Doubles /BIP2.17%÷1.000×0.810×0.952×0.9981.67%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.850×0.952×0.9980.00%
Home runs /BIP8.70%÷1.000×0.800—×0.9986.94%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.952.

Result: wOBA .341 → .276; ISO .191 → .155; BABIP .279 → .237. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 ROKACL Dodgers · 27 PAwOBA .435 → .297 (−138)K% 22.2% → 32.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA22.22%÷1.000×1.440——32.00%
BB% (unintentional) /PA14.81%÷1.000×0.620—×0.9658.86%
HBP% /PA3.70%—×0.720—×0.9652.57%
Singles /BIP12.50%÷1.000×0.820—×0.9659.89%
Doubles /BIP12.50%÷1.000×0.720—×0.9658.69%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.720—×0.9650.00%
Home runs /BIP12.50%÷1.000×0.780—×0.9659.41%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .435 → .297; ISO .364 → .256; BABIP .286 → .205. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 110 PAwOBA .348 → .269 (−79)K% 28.2% → 38.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA28.18%÷0.987×1.360——38.83%
BB% (unintentional) /PA15.45%÷0.981×0.690——10.87%
HBP% /PA3.64%—×0.780——2.84%
Singles /BIP33.33%÷1.004×0.920×1.005—30.70%
Doubles /BIP7.02%÷1.054×0.830×1.005—5.56%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.150×0.910×1.005—0.00%
Home runs /BIP1.75%÷1.055×0.800——1.33%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 111, 1B 101, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 97, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.005.

Result: wOBA .348 → .269; ISO .080 → .057; BABIP .411 → .367. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 A+Great Lakes Loons · 28 PAwOBA .225 → .187 (−38)K% 17.9% → 23.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA17.86%÷0.980×1.270——23.14%
BB% (unintentional) /PA10.71%÷1.023×0.710—×1.0127.53%
HBP% /PA3.57%—×0.790—×1.0122.86%
Singles /BIP21.05%÷1.000×0.920—×1.01219.61%
Doubles /BIP0.00%÷0.927×0.810—×1.0120.00%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.150×0.850—×1.0120.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷0.992×0.800—×1.0120.00%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 100, 2B 85, 3B 130, K 96, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .225 → .187; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .211 → .196. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).