Drew McDaniel
P Winston-Salem Dash| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 22 | ACWS | 20 | 17 | 78 | 4.60 | 3.59 | 19.0% | 7.7% | — | K 14.1% · BB 9.1% · FIP 4.71 |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 12 | 12 | 61 | 4.13 | 2.92 | 25.9% | 7.2% | — | K 19.4% · BB 8.4% · FIP 4.24 |
| 2026 | 25 | A+CWS | 25 | 23 | 91 | 4.57 | 4.47 | 23.8% | 9.7% | — | K 18.3% · BB 11.1% · FIP 5.65 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBCWS | — | — | 0 | 5.12 | 5.12 | 19.1% | 10.7% | — | |
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 27 | MLBCWS | 4 | 4 | 25 | 5.05 | 5.07 | 19.4% | 10.5% | 0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ59% MLB | 28 | MLBCWS | 6 | 6 | 39 | 4.89 | 4.82 | 21.5% | 9.6% | 0.3 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 5 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.3% | 13.3% | 10.0% | 0.0% | 8.44 | 2.82 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 5 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.3% | 13.3% | 10.0% | 0.0% | 8.44 | 2.73 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A MLE | Kannapolis Cannon Ballers | 20 | 17 | 78 | 352 | 67 | 27 | 7 | 85% | 3.9 | 14.1% | 9.1% | 5.0% | 3.0% | 4.60 | 4.71 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A RAW | Kannapolis Cannon Ballers | 20 | 17 | 78 | 352 | 67 | 27 | 7 | 85% | 3.9 | 19.0% | 7.7% | 11.4% | 2.0% | 4.60 | 3.59 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 61 | 251 | 65 | 18 | 5 | 100% | 5.1 | 19.4% | 8.4% | 11.0% | 3.1% | 4.13 | 4.24 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 61 | 251 | 65 | 18 | 5 | 100% | 5.1 | 19.4% | 8.4% | 11.0% | 3.1% | 4.13 | 4.24 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 61 | 251 | 65 | 18 | 5 | 100% | 5.1 | 25.9% | 7.2% | 18.7% | 2.0% | 4.13 | 2.92 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | A+ MLE | Winston-Salem Dash | 25 | 23 | 91 | 383 | 91 | 37 | 15 | 92% | 3.6 | 18.3% | 11.1% | 7.2% | 4.9% | 4.57 | 5.65 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | A+ MLE | Winston-Salem Dash | 25 | 23 | 91 | 383 | 91 | 37 | 15 | 92% | 3.6 | 18.3% | 11.1% | 7.2% | 4.9% | 4.57 | 5.65 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | A+ RAW | Winston-Salem Dash | 25 | 23 | 91 | 383 | 91 | 37 | 15 | 92% | 3.6 | 23.8% | 9.7% | 14.1% | 3.9% | 4.57 | 4.47 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | CWS | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.1% | 10.7% | 8.5% | 3.5% | 5.12 | 5.12 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | CWS | 11 | 11 | 67 | 283 | 55 | 30 | 10 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.4% | 10.5% | 8.9% | 3.5% | 5.05 | 5.07 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | CWS | 11 | 11 | 66 | 280 | 60 | 27 | 10 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.5% | 9.6% | 11.9% | 3.5% | 4.89 | 4.82 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB MLE | CWS | 10 | 10 | 60 | 255 | 55 | 25 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.3% | 9.8% | 11.5% | 3.7% | 4.90 | 4.93 | +0.3 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB MLE | CWS | 9 | 9 | 54 | 230 | 48 | 23 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.0% | 10.1% | 11.0% | 3.8% | 5.00 | 5.09 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | CWS | 4 | 4 | 25 | 106 | 20 | 11 | 4 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.4% | 10.5% | 8.9% | 3.5% | 5.05 | 5.07 | +0.1 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | CWS | 6 | 6 | 39 | 165 | 35 | 16 | 6 | 100% | 6.5 | 21.5% | 9.6% | 11.9% | 3.5% | 4.89 | 4.82 | +0.3 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB CTX | CWS | 7 | 7 | 43 | 182 | 39 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.3% | 9.8% | 11.5% | 3.7% | 4.90 | 4.93 | +0.2 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB CTX | CWS | 7 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 37 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.0% | 10.1% | 11.0% | 3.8% | 5.00 | 5.09 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 25 | 25 | 149 | 628 | 132 | 62 | 23 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.0% | 9.9% | 11.0% | 3.6% | 4.95 | 4.59 | +1.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 178 | 83 | 31 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.0% | 9.9% | 11.0% | 3.6% | 4.95 | 4.59 | +1.9 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 62 | 52 | 235 | 1016 | 175 | 99 | 37 | 84% | 3.8 | 17.2% | 9.8% | 7.5% | 3.7% | 4.55 | 4.89 | +1.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 53 | 44 | 200 | 863 | 149 | 85 | 32 | 84% | 3.8 | 17.2% | 9.8% | 7.5% | 3.7% | 4.55 | 4.89 | +1.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 91 IPFIP 4.47 → 5.65 (+1.18)K% 23.8% → 18.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.76% | — | ×0.770 | 18.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.66% | — | ×1.150 | 11.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.92% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 4.90% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.47 → 5.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AKannapolis Cannon Ballers · 40 IPFIP 2.46 → 3.98 (+1.52)K% 32.2% → 23.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.24% | — | ×0.740 | 23.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.89% | — | ×1.180 | 9.32% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.97% | ÷0.820 | ×1.300 | 3.13% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 64).
Result: FIP 2.46 → 3.98, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 21 IPFIP 3.61 → 4.63 (+1.02)K% 16.2% → 12.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.16% | — | ×0.770 | 12.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.06% | — | ×1.150 | 6.97% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.02% | ÷0.817 | ×1.250 | 3.09% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 63).
Result: FIP 3.61 → 4.63, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AKannapolis Cannon Ballers · 78 IPFIP 3.56 → 4.71 (+1.15)K% 19.0% → 14.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.03% | — | ×0.740 | 14.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.67% | — | ×1.180 | 9.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.99% | ÷0.861 | ×1.300 | 3.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 72).
Result: FIP 3.56 → 4.71, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AKannapolis Cannon Ballers · 3 IPFIP 3.83 → 4.61 (+0.78)K% 17.4% → 12.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.39% | — | ×0.740 | 12.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.39% | — | ×1.180 | 20.52% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.172 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 134).
Result: FIP 3.83 → 4.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.5 | 62 | 20.5% | 10.1% | 1.39 | 4.99 |
| José Ruiz ('25) | 1.4 | 57 | 22.3% | 10.4% | 1.44 | 4.62 |
| Scott Proctor ('11) | 1.7 | 57 | 19.0% | 10.9% | 1.52 | 4.78 |
| Josias Manzanillo ('04) | 1.7 | 57 | 20.0% | 10.2% | 1.21 | 4.71 |
| Bob Macdonald ('90-'96, 1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 59 | 18.3%* | 9.8%* | 1.20* | 4.32* |
| Bill Scherrer ('82-'88, 1 WAR*) | 1.6 | 62 | 20.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.19* | 4.44* |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |