Steven Cruz
P Kansas City Royals| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 52 | 0 | 57 | 3.00 | 3.17 | 25.4% | 10.2% | 0.9 | K 22.1% · BB 9.9% · FIP 3.49 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 54 | 0 | 53 | 3.57 | 3.59 | 21.9% | 8.7% | 0.6 | K 20.1% · BB 9.0% · FIP 4.11 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 64 | 2 | 66 | 4.52 | 4.74 | 26.6% | 7.4% | -0.2 | K 26.4% · BB 7.3% · FIP 5.17 |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBKC | 50 | 0 | 53 | 4.49 | 4.62 | 25.9% | 8.8% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ95% MLB | 29 | MLBKC | 45 | 0 | 47 | 4.66 | 4.78 | 25.3% | 9.0% | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ95% MLB | 30 | MLBKC | 36 | 0 | 38 | 4.85 | 4.98 | 24.6% | 9.3% | -0.2 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Twins | 16 | 3 | 29 | 126 | 26 | 14 | 0 | 19% | 1.8 | 14.0% | 13.9% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 3.68 | 3.67 | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Twins | 16 | 3 | 29 | 126 | 26 | 14 | 0 | 19% | 1.8 | 20.6% | 11.1% | 9.5% | 0.0% | 3.68 | 2.76 | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Twins | 13 | 2 | 26 | 119 | 33 | 24 | 0 | 15% | 2.0 | 18.9% | 25.2% | -6.4% | 0.0% | 3.12 | 4.70 | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK RAW | GCL Twins | 13 | 2 | 26 | 119 | 33 | 24 | 0 | 15% | 2.0 | 27.7% | 20.2% | 7.6% | 0.0% | 3.12 | 3.33 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 2 | 50 | 225 | 80 | 33 | 3 | 7% | 1.8 | 26.7% | 16.8% | 9.9% | 2.0% | 4.32 | 4.09 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 28 | 2 | 50 | 225 | 80 | 33 | 3 | 7% | 1.8 | 35.6% | 14.7% | 20.9% | 1.3% | 4.32 | 2.66 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA MLE | Wichita Wind Surge | 46 | 0 | 56 | 257 | 72 | 35 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 22.7% | 15.0% | 7.7% | 1.9% | 5.14 | 4.12 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA RAW | Wichita Wind Surge | 46 | 0 | 56 | 257 | 72 | 35 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 28.0% | 13.6% | 14.4% | 1.6% | 5.14 | 3.33 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 53 | 4 | 62 | 271 | 79 | 41 | 5 | 8% | 1.2 | 25.1% | 15.5% | 9.6% | 2.2% | 4.04 | 4.15 | +0.3 |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 53 | 4 | 62 | 271 | 79 | 41 | 5 | 8% | 1.2 | 29.2% | 15.1% | 14.0% | 1.8% | 4.04 | 3.58 | +0.7 |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 52 | 0 | 57 | 236 | 60 | 24 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.1% | 9.9% | 12.2% | 1.8% | 3.00 | 3.49 | +0.7 |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 52 | 0 | 57 | 236 | 60 | 24 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.1% | 9.9% | 12.2% | 1.8% | 3.00 | 3.49 | +0.7 |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 52 | 0 | 57 | 236 | 60 | 24 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.4% | 10.2% | 15.3% | 1.7% | 3.00 | 3.17 | +0.9 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 53 | 219 | 48 | 19 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.1% | 9.0% | 11.1% | 2.9% | 3.57 | 4.11 | +0.3 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 53 | 219 | 48 | 19 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.1% | 9.0% | 11.1% | 2.9% | 3.57 | 4.11 | +0.3 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 53 | 219 | 48 | 19 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.9% | 8.7% | 13.2% | 2.3% | 3.57 | 3.59 | +0.6 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 64 | 2 | 66 | 282 | 75 | 21 | 15 | 3% | 1.0 | 26.4% | 7.3% | 19.1% | 6.2% | 4.52 | 5.17 | -0.5 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 64 | 2 | 66 | 282 | 75 | 21 | 15 | 3% | 1.0 | 26.4% | 7.3% | 19.1% | 6.2% | 4.52 | 5.17 | -0.5 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 64 | 2 | 66 | 282 | 75 | 21 | 15 | 3% | 1.0 | 26.6% | 7.4% | 19.1% | 5.3% | 4.52 | 4.74 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 118 | 6 | 123 | 515 | 122 | 46 | 20 | 5% | 1.0 | 23.7% | 8.9% | 14.8% | 3.9% | 3.96 | 4.36 | +0.3 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | KC | 50 | 0 | 53 | 224 | 58 | 20 | 9 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.9% | 8.8% | 17.1% | 4.0% | 4.49 | 4.62 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | KC | 47 | 0 | 49 | 208 | 53 | 19 | 9 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.3% | 9.0% | 16.3% | 4.2% | 4.66 | 4.78 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB MLE | KC | 38 | 0 | 40 | 170 | 42 | 16 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.6% | 9.3% | 15.3% | 4.4% | 4.85 | 4.98 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | KC | 45 | 0 | 47 | 198 | 50 | 18 | 8 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.3% | 9.0% | 16.3% | 4.2% | 4.66 | 4.78 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB CTX | KC | 36 | 0 | 38 | 160 | 39 | 15 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.6% | 9.3% | 15.3% | 4.4% | 4.85 | 4.98 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 199 | 6 | 208 | 874 | 212 | 79 | 35 | 3% | 1.0 | 24.2% | 9.0% | 15.2% | 4.0% | 4.28 | 4.41 | +0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 192 | 6 | 200 | 842 | 204 | 76 | 34 | 3% | 1.0 | 24.2% | 9.0% | 15.2% | 4.0% | 4.28 | 4.41 | +0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 326 | 13 | 399 | 1735 | 397 | 229 | 43 | 4% | 1.2 | 22.9% | 13.2% | 9.7% | 2.5% | 4.01 | 4.21 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 163 | 7 | 200 | 869 | 199 | 115 | 22 | 4% | 1.2 | 22.9% | 13.2% | 9.7% | 2.5% | 4.01 | 4.21 | -0.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 7 IPFIP 3.33 → 3.71 (+0.38)K% 27.8% → 23.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.78% | — | ×0.860 | 23.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.33% | — | ×0.900 | 7.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.78% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 3.06% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.33 → 3.71, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 7 IPFIP 1.13 → 1.44 (+0.31)K% 33.3% → 28.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.33% | — | ×0.860 | 28.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.67% | — | ×0.900 | 6.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.003 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 1.13 → 1.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 51 IPFIP 3.33 → 3.49 (+0.15)K% 25.7% → 22.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.69% | — | ×0.860 | 22.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.01% | — | ×0.900 | 9.91% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.83% | ÷1.111 | ×1.100 | 1.82% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 122).
Result: FIP 3.33 → 3.49, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AANorthwest Arkansas Naturals · 33 IPFIP 2.76 → 3.59 (+0.83)K% 30.7% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.66% | — | ×0.810 | 24.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.60% | — | ×1.100 | 16.06% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.73% | ÷0.872 | ×1.200 | 1.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 74).
Result: FIP 2.76 → 3.59, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 17 IPFIP 4.57 → 5.14 (+0.57)K% 30.6% → 26.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.56% | — | ×0.860 | 26.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.89% | — | ×0.900 | 12.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.17% | ÷0.942 | ×1.100 | 4.87% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 4.57 → 5.14, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAWichita Wind Surge · 56 IPFIP 3.31 → 4.12 (+0.81)K% 28.0% → 22.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.02% | — | ×0.810 | 22.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.62% | — | ×1.100 | 14.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.56% | ÷0.985 | ×1.200 | 1.90% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 3.31 → 4.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AFort Myers Mighty Mussels · 47 IPFIP 2.64 → 4.09 (+1.45)K% 36.0% → 26.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.02% | — | ×0.740 | 26.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.22% | — | ×1.180 | 16.78% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.42% | ÷0.908 | ×1.300 | 2.04% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 2.64 → 4.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKGCL Twins · 26 IPFIP 3.31 → 4.70 (+1.39)K% 27.7% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.73% | — | ×0.680 | 18.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.17% | — | ×1.250 | 25.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.31 → 4.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.3 | 54 | 24.6% | 9.2% | 1.56 | 4.33 |
| Noé Ramirez ('22) | 1.5 | 59 | 24.8% | 9.4% | 1.42 | 4.21 |
| José Ruiz ('25) | 1.4 | 57 | 22.3% | 10.4% | 1.44 | 4.62 |
| Chris Hatcher ('18) | 1.3 | 53 | 22.9% | 8.4% | 1.32 | 4.65 |
| Pete Ladd ('79-'86, 0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 72 | 24.6%* | 7.8%* | 1.53* | 4.42* |
| Julio Navarro ('62-'70, 1 WAR*) | 1.1 | 53 | 21.7%* | 7.8%* | 1.55* | 4.13* |
| Randy St. Claire ('84-'94, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 50 | 19.0%* | 8.4%* | 1.39* | 4.61* |