Brett Sears
P Columbus Clingstones| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25 | MIX4 levels | 25 | 21 | 121 | 3.65 | 3.47 | 25.7% | 6.2% | — | K 21.1% · BB 7.1% · FIP 3.64 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX3 levels | 23 | 21 | 124 | 2.90 | 2.51 | 31.0% | 6.1% | — | K 25.1% · BB 6.5% · FIP 3.30 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBATL | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.79 | 3.79 | 23.4% | 6.0% | 0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 28 | MLBATL | 8 | 8 | 48 | 3.89 | 3.92 | 23.2% | 6.3% | 0.9 | |
| 2029PROJ56% MLB | 29 | MLBATL | 11 | 11 | 64 | 4.01 | 4.07 | 22.9% | 6.6% | 1.0 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 25 | 21 | 121 | 498 | 128 | 31 | 16 | 84% | 4.8 | 21.1% | 7.1% | 14.0% | 2.6% | 3.65 | 3.64 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 25 | 21 | 121 | 498 | 128 | 31 | 16 | 84% | 4.8 | 21.1% | 7.1% | 14.0% | 2.6% | 3.65 | 3.64 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 25 | 21 | 121 | 498 | 128 | 31 | 16 | 84% | 4.8 | 25.7% | 6.2% | 19.5% | 3.2% | 3.65 | 3.47 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 23 | 21 | 124 | 494 | 153 | 30 | 11 | 91% | 5.4 | 25.1% | 6.5% | 18.5% | 2.7% | 2.90 | 3.30 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 23 | 21 | 124 | 494 | 153 | 30 | 11 | 91% | 5.4 | 25.1% | 6.5% | 18.5% | 2.7% | 2.90 | 3.30 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 23 | 21 | 124 | 494 | 153 | 30 | 11 | 91% | 5.4 | 31.0% | 6.1% | 24.9% | 2.2% | 2.90 | 2.51 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | ATL | 1 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 3.0 | 23.4% | 6.0% | 17.5% | 2.8% | 3.79 | 3.79 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | ATL | 21 | 21 | 127 | 535 | 124 | 34 | 16 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.2% | 6.3% | 16.9% | 2.9% | 3.89 | 3.92 | +2.2 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB MLE | ATL | 19 | 19 | 115 | 485 | 111 | 32 | 15 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.9% | 6.6% | 16.2% | 3.1% | 4.01 | 4.07 | +1.8 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB MLE | ATL | 17 | 17 | 104 | 441 | 99 | 31 | 14 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.5% | 7.0% | 15.5% | 3.3% | 4.17 | 4.26 | +1.4 |
| 2031 | 31 | MLB MLE | ATL | 16 | 16 | 94 | 397 | 88 | 29 | 14 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.1% | 7.4% | 14.7% | 3.5% | 4.35 | 4.46 | +1.0 |
| 2032 | 32 | MLB MLE | ATL | 14 | 14 | 83 | 351 | 76 | 27 | 13 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.6% | 7.8% | 13.8% | 3.7% | 4.55 | 4.69 | +0.7 |
| 2033 | 33 | MLB MLE | ATL | 12 | 12 | 72 | 302 | 64 | 25 | 12 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.1% | 8.2% | 12.9% | 4.0% | 4.78 | 4.94 | +0.4 |
| 2034 | 34 | MLB MLE | ATL | 10 | 10 | 60 | 255 | 52 | 22 | 11 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.5% | 8.7% | 11.8% | 4.3% | 5.04 | 5.21 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | ATL | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 47 | 13 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.2% | 6.3% | 16.9% | 2.9% | 3.89 | 3.92 | +0.9 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB CTX | ATL | 11 | 11 | 64 | 270 | 62 | 18 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.9% | 6.6% | 16.2% | 3.1% | 4.01 | 4.07 | +1.0 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB CTX | ATL | 12 | 12 | 71 | 300 | 67 | 21 | 10 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.5% | 7.0% | 15.5% | 3.3% | 4.17 | 4.26 | +1.0 |
| 2031 | 31 | MLB CTX | ATL | 12 | 12 | 72 | 304 | 67 | 22 | 11 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.1% | 7.4% | 14.7% | 3.5% | 4.35 | 4.46 | +0.8 |
| 2032 | 32 | MLB CTX | ATL | 11 | 11 | 68 | 287 | 62 | 22 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.6% | 7.8% | 13.8% | 3.7% | 4.55 | 4.69 | +0.6 |
| 2033 | 33 | MLB CTX | ATL | 10 | 10 | 62 | 262 | 55 | 21 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.1% | 8.2% | 12.9% | 4.0% | 4.78 | 4.94 | +0.3 |
| 2034 | 34 | MLB CTX | ATL | 8 | 8 | 50 | 211 | 43 | 18 | 9 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.5% | 8.7% | 11.8% | 4.3% | 5.04 | 5.21 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 72 | 72 | 434 | 1834 | 403 | 136 | 65 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.0% | 7.4% | 14.6% | 3.5% | 4.39 | 4.12 | +6.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 186 | 63 | 30 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.0% | 7.4% | 14.6% | 3.5% | 4.39 | 4.12 | +3.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 48 | 42 | 245 | 992 | 229 | 68 | 26 | 88% | 5.1 | 23.1% | 6.8% | 16.3% | 2.7% | 3.27 | 3.47 | +7.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 39 | 34 | 200 | 810 | 187 | 55 | 21 | 88% | 5.1 | 23.1% | 6.8% | 16.3% | 2.7% | 3.27 | 3.47 | +2.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAColumbus Clingstones · 95 IPFIP 2.77 → 3.61 (+0.84)K% 29.7% → 24.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.74% | — | ×0.810 | 24.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.79% | — | ×1.100 | 6.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.63% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 3.16% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.77 → 3.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAAGwinnett Stripers · 26 IPFIP 1.82 → 2.17 (+0.35)K% 33.3% → 28.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.33% | — | ×0.860 | 28.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.84% | — | ×0.900 | 7.06% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.98% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 1.08% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.82 → 2.17, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAColumbus Clingstones · 74 IPFIP 3.09 → 3.87 (+0.79)K% 24.1% → 19.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.10% | — | ×0.810 | 19.52% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.49% | — | ×1.100 | 8.24% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.95% | ÷0.934 | ×1.200 | 2.51% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 3.09 → 3.87, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAugusta GreenJackets · 19 IPFIP 1.10 → 2.10 (+1.00)K% 39.7% → 29.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 39.74% | — | ×0.740 | 29.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.13% | — | ×1.180 | 6.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.28% | ÷1.281 | ×1.300 | 1.30% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 156).
Result: FIP 1.10 → 2.10, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Rome Emperors · 18 IPFIP 2.98 → 4.33 (+1.35)K% 24.3% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.29% | — | ×0.770 | 18.70% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.86% | — | ×1.150 | 3.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.86% | ÷0.819 | ×1.250 | 4.36% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 64).
Result: FIP 2.98 → 4.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAGwinnett Stripers · 10 IPFIP 11.45 → 12.84 (+1.39)K% 14.0% → 12.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.95% | — | ×0.860 | 12.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.65% | — | ×0.900 | 4.19% |
| HR / BF /BF | 16.28% | ÷0.961 | ×1.100 | 18.62% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 11.45 → 12.84, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 4.0 | 100 | 22.4% | 7.0% | 1.28 | 4.22 |
| Ross Stripling ('24) | 4.2 | 94 | 20.9% | 5.6% | 1.32 | 4.17 |
| Mark Leiter ('90-'01, 5 WAR*) | 5.9 | 118 | 20.7%* | 7.8%* | 1.36* | 4.61* |
| Kenta Maeda ('25) | 4.9 | 123 | 25.8% | 7.0% | 1.30 | 4.20 |
| Matt Andriese ('24) | 2.6 | 74 | 21.8% | 6.7% | 1.36 | 4.65 |
| Wally Whitehurst ('89-'96, 4 WAR*) | 2.4 | 98 | 19.0%* | 6.3%* | 1.11* | 4.50* |
| Greg Harris ('88-'95, 10 WAR*) | 4.5 | 130 | 19.7%* | 7.9%* | 1.40* | 4.10* |