Nick Schwartz
C Lansing Lugnuts| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 22 | ROKOAK | 21 | .588/.667/.765 | 1 | 0 | 213 | — | .500/.571/.667 |
| 2024 | 23 | A/ROKOAK | 250 | .214/.327/.267 | 2 | 2 | 26 | — | .161/.246/.193 |
| 2025 | 24 | A+OAK | 104 | .255/.301/.340 | 1 | 1 | 29 | — | .194/.233/.265 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 26 | MLBOAK | 200 | .214/.279/.321 | 3 | 3 | 69 | 0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ26% MLB | 27 | MLBOAK | 19 | .220/.285/.333 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 0.0 |
Tools · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 22 | ROK | ACL Athletics | — | 21 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 588 | 667 | 765 | 1.431 | 176 | 643 | 10 | 14 | 622 | 213 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 202 | 169 | 35 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 28 | 60 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 207 | 325 | 266 | 591 | 59 | 303 | 30 | 14 | 280 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | ROK | ACL Athletics | — | 48 | 41 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 244 | 333 | 268 | 602 | 24 | 370 | 29 | 12 | 284 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 104 | 94 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 255 | 301 | 340 | 641 | 85 | 365 | 29 | 7 | 285 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 22 | ROK MLE | ACL Athletics | — | 21 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 500 | 571 | 667 | 1.238 | 167 | 519 | 14 | 10 | 483 | 213 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 202 | 179 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 80 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 162 | 250 | 196 | 446 | 34 | 276 | 40 | 9 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | ROK MLE | ACL Athletics | — | 48 | 44 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 159 | 229 | 182 | 411 | 23 | 280 | 42 | 8 | 180 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 104 | 98 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 39 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 194 | 233 | 265 | 498 | 71 | 305 | 38 | 5 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | ROK MLE | ACL Athletics | — | 21 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 500 | 571 | 667 | 1.238 | 167 | 571 | 14 | 10 | 483 | 213 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | ROK RAW | ACL Athletics | — | 21 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 588 | 667 | 765 | 1.431 | 176 | 643 | 10 | 14 | 622 | 213 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 250 | 224 | 36 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 101 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 161 | 242 | 192 | 434 | 31 | 282 | 40 | 9 | 207 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 250 | 210 | 45 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 34 | 74 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 214 | 327 | 267 | 593 | 52 | 316 | 30 | 14 | 281 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 104 | 98 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 39 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 194 | 233 | 265 | 498 | 71 | 310 | 38 | 5 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ RAW | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 104 | 94 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 255 | 301 | 340 | 641 | 85 | 365 | 29 | 7 | 285 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | ROK MLE | ACL Athletics | — | 21 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 500 | 571 | 667 | 1.238 | 167 | 519 | 14 | 10 | 483 | 213 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 250 | 224 | 36 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 101 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 161 | 242 | 192 | 434 | 31 | 277 | 40 | 9 | 207 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 104 | 98 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 39 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 194 | 233 | 265 | 498 | 71 | 305 | 38 | 5 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 250 | 224 | 36 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 101 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 161 | 242 | 192 | 434 | 31 | 277 | 40 | 9 | 207 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 104 | 98 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 39 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 194 | 233 | 265 | 498 | 71 | 305 | 38 | 5 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB MLE | OAK | 0% | 200 | 181 | 38 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 57 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 214 | 279 | 321 | 599 | 107 | 288 | 28 | 8 | 271 | 69 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +4 | 0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | OAK | 26% | 73 | 67 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 214 | 280 | 323 | 602 | 108 | 288 | 29 | 7 | 272 | 70 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +2 | 0.1 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | OAK | 26% | 19 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 220 | 285 | 333 | 618 | 112 | 297 | 26 | 5 | 278 | 70 | -1 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 19 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 222 | 263 | 278 | 541 | 56 | 308 | 26 | 5 | 278 | 45 | -1 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | 0.0 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 616 | 137 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 171 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 222 | 263 | 278 | 541 | 55 | 308 | 26 | 5 | 278 | 45 | -23 | +0 | +0 | +12 | +14 | 0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 495 | 451 | 87 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 37 | 177 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 193 | 260 | 255 | 515 | 62 | 303 | 36 | 7 | 235 | 45 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +3 | 0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 592 | 114 | 14 | 1 | 7 | 49 | 232 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 193 | 260 | 255 | 515 | 62 | 301 | 36 | 8 | 235 | 45 | -23 | +2 | +0 | +12 | +14 | 0.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 104 PAwOBA .277 → .211 (−67)K% 28.8% → 37.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.85% | ÷0.969 | ×1.270 | — | — | 37.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.73% | ÷1.048 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 4.51% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.69% | ÷1.078 | ×0.920 | ×1.026 | ×0.988 | 25.67% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.69% | ÷1.199 | ×0.810 | ×1.026 | ×0.988 | 3.21% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.56% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×1.026 | ×0.988 | 1.17% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.56% | ÷0.921 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 1.34% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 116, 2B 140, 3B 130, K 94, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.
Result: wOBA .277 → .211; ISO .085 → .061; BABIP .365 → .305. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AStockton Ports · 202 PAwOBA .276 → .213 (−64)K% 29.7% → 39.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.70% | ÷1.015 | ×1.360 | — | — | 39.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.86% | ÷1.021 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 9.28% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.99% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.76% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.61% | ÷1.004 | ×0.920 | ×1.021 | ×0.990 | 24.66% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.67% | ÷0.979 | ×0.830 | ×1.021 | ×0.990 | 3.15% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×1.021 | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.83% | ÷1.164 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 1.25% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 133, 1B 101, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 103, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.021.
Result: wOBA .276 → .213; ISO .059 → .041; BABIP .303 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKACL Athletics · 48 PAwOBA .277 → .180 (−97)K% 29.2% → 42.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.17% | ÷0.998 | ×1.440 | — | — | 42.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.50% | ÷0.986 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.965 | 7.58% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 33.33% | ÷1.027 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.965 | 25.69% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.70% | ÷1.124 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 2.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.907 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.852 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 105, 2B 125, 3B 81, K 100, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .277 → .180; ISO .024 → .013; BABIP .370 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKACL Athletics · 21 PAwOBA .606 → .483 (−123)K% 9.5% → 13.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 9.52% | ÷1.018 | ×1.440 | — | — | 13.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.29% | ÷1.030 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.975 | 8.39% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.76% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 3.34% |
| Singles /BIP | 60.00% | ÷0.974 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.975 | 49.23% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.051 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.149 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.67% | ÷0.989 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.975 | 5.13% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 95, 2B 110, 3B 130, K 104, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .606 → .483; ISO .176 → .142; BABIP .643 → .519. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).