Lucas Ramirez
RF Rancho Cucamonga Quakes| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19 | A+/ROKLAA | 226 | .266/.362/.417 | 3 | 6 | 52 | — | .197/.262/.309 |
| 2026 | 20 | ALAA | 430 | .242/.322/.417 | 9 | 10 | 47 | — | .177/.242/.296 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 21 | MLBLAA | 540 | .191/.252/.294 | 8 | 9 | 54 | -0.7 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 22 | MLBLAA | 129 | .195/.258/.308 | 2 | 2 | 60 | -0.5 |
Tools · ContractCON 45 / POW 35
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | A+ | Tri-City Dust Devils | — | 35 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 172 | 273 | 207 | 480 | 34 | 294 | 40 | 9 | 221 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK | ACL Angels | — | 191 | 163 | 46 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 23 | 39 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 282 | 378 | 454 | 832 | 172 | 350 | 20 | 12 | 364 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 430 | 384 | 93 | 24 | 8 | 9 | 39 | 141 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 242 | 322 | 417 | 738 | 174 | 357 | 33 | 9 | 328 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | A+ MLE | Tri-City Dust Devils | — | 35 | 30 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 133 | 212 | 167 | 379 | 33 | 269 | 54 | 6 | 185 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL Angels | — | 191 | 173 | 36 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 58 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 208 | 271 | 335 | 607 | 127 | 275 | 30 | 7 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 430 | 395 | 70 | 17 | 6 | 6 | 28 | 192 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 177 | 242 | 296 | 539 | 119 | 318 | 45 | 7 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 226 | 203 | 40 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 77 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 197 | 262 | 310 | 573 | 113 | 291 | 34 | 7 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 226 | 192 | 51 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 26 | 53 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 266 | 362 | 417 | 779 | 151 | 343 | 23 | 12 | 342 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 430 | 395 | 70 | 17 | 6 | 6 | 28 | 192 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 177 | 242 | 296 | 539 | 119 | 323 | 45 | 7 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 430 | 384 | 93 | 24 | 8 | 9 | 39 | 141 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 242 | 322 | 417 | 738 | 174 | 357 | 33 | 9 | 328 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 226 | 206 | 40 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 77 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 194 | 262 | 306 | 568 | 112 | 274 | 34 | 7 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 430 | 393 | 70 | 17 | 6 | 6 | 28 | 192 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 178 | 242 | 298 | 540 | 120 | 318 | 45 | 7 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 226 | 206 | 40 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 77 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 194 | 262 | 306 | 568 | 112 | 274 | 34 | 7 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 430 | 393 | 70 | 17 | 6 | 6 | 28 | 192 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 178 | 242 | 298 | 540 | 120 | 318 | 45 | 7 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB MLE | LAA | 0% | 540 | 494 | 95 | 20 | 4 | 8 | 35 | 190 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 191 | 252 | 294 | 546 | 103 | 287 | 35 | 6 | 247 | 54 | -30 | +1 | +0 | -6 | +12 | -0.7 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | LAA | 34% | 376 | 344 | 68 | 14 | 3 | 7 | 25 | 128 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 197 | 259 | 310 | 569 | 113 | 288 | 34 | 7 | 257 | 60 | -18 | +0 | +0 | -4 | +8 | -1.4 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | LAA | 34% | 129 | 118 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 44 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 195 | 258 | 308 | 566 | 113 | 285 | 34 | 7 | 256 | 60 | -6 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +3 | -0.5 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 129 | 118 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 44 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 195 | 258 | 305 | 563 | 110 | 288 | 34 | 7 | 256 | 53 | -6 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +3 | -0.5 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 595 | 116 | 25 | 5 | 10 | 45 | 222 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 195 | 257 | 304 | 562 | 109 | 288 | 34 | 7 | 256 | 53 | -31 | +0 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -2.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1242 | 1135 | 214 | 45 | 14 | 19 | 81 | 471 | 15 | 25 | 7 | 189 | 252 | 303 | 555 | 115 | 299 | 38 | 7 | 246 | 53 | -30 | +1 | +0 | -6 | +13 | -2.3 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 594 | 112 | 24 | 7 | 10 | 42 | 246 | 8 | 13 | 4 | 189 | 252 | 303 | 555 | 114 | 298 | 38 | 6 | 246 | 53 | -33 | +1 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -2.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 430 PAwOBA .320 → .237 (−83)K% 32.8% → 44.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.79% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 44.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.07% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 6.45% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.40% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 1.12% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.40% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.974 | ×1.030 | 19.74% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.974 | ×1.030 | 8.22% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.29% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.974 | ×1.030 | 3.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.70% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 3.05% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.974.
Result: wOBA .320 → .237; ISO .174 → .125; BABIP .357 → .318. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKACL Angels · 191 PAwOBA .357 → .255 (−102)K% 20.4% → 30.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.42% | ÷0.969 | ×1.440 | — | — | 30.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.52% | ÷1.082 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 6.65% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.05% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.76% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.19% | ÷1.015 | ×0.820 | ×1.015 | ×1.008 | 19.99% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.65% | ÷0.992 | ×0.720 | ×1.015 | ×1.008 | 4.19% |
| Triples /BIP | 4.84% | ÷1.134 | ×0.720 | ×1.015 | ×1.008 | 3.14% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.42% | ÷0.873 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 2.18% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 103, 2B 98, 3B 127, K 94, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.015.
Result: wOBA .357 → .255; ISO .172 → .124; BABIP .350 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Tri-City Dust Devils · 35 PAwOBA .229 → .185 (−44)K% 40.0% → 53.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 40.00% | ÷1.019 | ×1.350 | — | — | 52.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.57% | ÷0.975 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.050 | 6.56% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.86% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×1.050 | 2.43% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.67% | ÷1.019 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.050 | 25.01% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.67% | ÷0.975 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.050 | 5.96% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 104, 2B 95, 3B 80, K 104, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.8 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .229 → .185; ISO .034 → .027; BABIP .294 → .269. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).