Robinson Narciso

P FCL Braves

Age 22 RHP 6'0" / 170 lbs ROK

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2025	20	ROKATL	1	1	9.00	3.10	0.0%	0.0%	—	K 0.0% · BB 0.0% · FIP 3.10
2026	21	ROKATL	17	14	20.41	12.10	6.2%	33.3%	—	K 4.2% · BB 41.7% · FIP 10.42
2027PROJ	22	MLBATL	8	8	6.15	6.15	18.1%	20.0%	-0.1
2028PROJ49% MLB	23	MLBATL	10	10	5.73	5.57	19.8%	16.7%	-0.1

Next 2 projected WAR -0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 0 / P90 0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 100%

CompsJackson Rose (age 22) · Andrew Schultz (age 22) · Christian Ruebeck (age 23)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 150142vR 134

ERA6.15

FIP6.15

K%18.1%

BB%20.0%

K-BB%-1.9%

Proj IP8

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 8 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†4545

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2025	20	ROK MLE	DSL Braves	1	0	1	4	0	0	0	0%	1.0	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	9.00	3.10	—
2025	20	ROK MLE	DSL Braves	1	0	1	4	0	0	0	0%	1.0	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	9.00	3.10	—
2025	20	ROK RAW	DSL Braves	1	0	1	4	0	0	0	0%	1.0	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	9.00	3.10	—
2026	21	ROK MLE	FCL Braves	17	0	14	96	6	32	3	0%	0.8	4.2%	41.7%	-37.4%	4.4%	20.41	10.42	—
2026	21	ROK MLE	FCL Braves	17	0	14	96	6	32	3	0%	0.8	4.2%	41.7%	-37.4%	4.4%	20.41	10.42	—
2026	21	ROK RAW	FCL Braves	17	0	14	96	6	32	3	0%	0.8	6.2%	33.3%	-27.1%	3.1%	20.41	12.10	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	22	MLB	ATL	8	0	8	34	6	7	1	0%	1.0	18.1%	20.0%	-1.9%	3.0%	6.15	6.15	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	23	MLB MLE	ATL	19	0	20	84	17	14	3	0%	1.1	19.8%	16.7%	3.0%	3.0%	5.73	5.57	-0.2
2028	23	MLB CTX	ATL	10	0	10	42	8	7	1	0%	1.0	19.8%	16.7%	3.0%	3.0%	5.73	5.57	-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		9	0	10	42	8	7	1	0%	1.1	19.8%	16.7%	3.0%	3.0%	5.73	5.19	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	163	142	20	0%	1.1	19.8%	16.7%	3.0%	3.0%	5.73	5.19	-1.5
Career	—	MLE		18	0	15	100	4	40	4	0%	0.8	4.1%	40.0%	-35.9%	4.2%	19.64	10.13	-0.2
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		245	0	200	1364	56	545	57	0%	0.8	4.1%	40.0%	-35.9%	4.2%	19.64	10.13	-2.4

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Robinson Narciso (OGILVIE)	—	—	6.15	18.1%	20.0%	3.0%	—	5.57	19.8%	3.0%	20	-0.58	—	—	—
Jackson Rose R 2018 · 5.32 FIP	22	SU	5.32	17.3%	17.2%	2.8%	.267	4.77	23.5%	16.5%	56	-0.55	3.33	147	93
Andrew Schultz R 2019 · 5.25 FIP	22	SU	5.25	20.9%	17.8%	3.0%	.345	4.59	23.0%	4.7%	45	-0.66	3.56	176	87
Christian Ruebeck R 2024 · 6.03 FIP	23	SU	6.03	20.6%	24.4%	2.9%	.265	4.57	21.6%	1.9%	70	-1.46	4.35	104	87
Hudson Leach R 2024 · 5.37 FIP	22	SU	5.37	20.5%	20.0%	2.7%	.261	4.54	20.9%	3.1%	71	-0.83	2.77	101	87
Jairo Beras R 2017 · 6.07 FIP	22	SU	6.07	16.4%	16.9%	4.0%	.237	4.35	20.7%	4.5%	96	-1.72	3.48	110	87
Michael Perez R 2024 · 5.44 FIP	21	SU	5.44	18.3%	16.1%	3.4%	.296	4.65	23.4%	7.7%	132	-0.79	4.38	153	87
Franklyn German R 2003 · 5.17 FIP	23	SU	5.17	18.5%	18.9%	2.2%	.313	5.27	13.1%	0.1%	86	+0.10	3.37	152	86
Tommy McCollum R 2021 · 6.21 FIP	22	SU	6.21	17.1%	27.2%	2.0%	.235	3.80	26.4%	10.9%	112	-2.41	2.90	219	86
Bryce McGowan R 2022 · 5.90 FIP	22	SU	5.90	17.0%	22.9%	2.4%	.368	4.36	20.6%	6.6%	145	-1.54	3.71	178	85
Greg Weissert R 2016 · 5.22 FIP	21	SU	5.22	19.4%	19.3%	2.4%	.382	3.80	23.0%	10.3%	126	-1.42	2.57	487	85
Jace Beck R 2022 · 6.24 FIP	22	SU	6.24	19.2%	23.6%	3.2%	.205	4.33	27.6%	8.3%	76	-1.91	4.03	216	85
Marcus Crescentini R 2015 · 5.80 FIP	22	SU	5.80	21.8%	21.9%	3.2%	.365	3.95	23.3%	11.6%	123	-1.85	2.74	150	85
Cory Thompson R 2017 · 5.42 FIP	22	SU	5.42	15.2%	15.7%	2.9%	.289	4.34	16.3%	10.6%	131	-1.08	3.59	218	85
Alec Kenilvort R 2016 · 6.44 FIP	23	SU	6.44	15.1%	17.0%	4.5%	.333	3.97	18.3%	9.1%	85	-2.47	2.97	109	84
Michael Blazek R 2013 · 5.52 FIP	24	SU	5.52	16.7%	15.5%	3.4%	.241	3.81	19.8%	10.3%	97	-1.71	2.99	238	84
Jack Hartman R 2022 · 5.78 FIP	24	SU	5.78	15.1%	20.3%	2.5%	.357	3.99	19.5%	8.6%	143	-1.79	3.46	161	84
Nick Kuzia R 2017 · 5.18 FIP	21	SU	5.18	16.5%	15.2%	2.8%	.361	5.35	17.6%	6.6%	60	+0.17	4.54	231	84
Brett Hanewich R 2017 · 5.18 FIP	22	SU	5.18	15.9%	17.6%	2.2%	.372	4.32	20.3%	2.8%	108	-0.86	4.24	134	84
Saul Teran R 2024 · 5.21 FIP	22	SU	5.21	22.4%	18.8%	2.9%	.279	4.40	20.1%	10.7%	84	-0.81	2.28	166	83
Cole Ayers R 2022 · 5.58 FIP	22	SU	5.58	13.0%	15.4%	2.9%	.305	4.01	21.2%	10.1%	152	-1.57	3.58	171	83