Cory Thompson

P Springfield Cardinals
Age 32 RHP 5'11" / 180 lbs AA
Overview
AALAST SEASON 2022
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
201924MIX2 levels450593.344.3520.7%6.4%—K 16.4% · BB 7.1% · FIP 5.25
202126MIX2 levels260433.593.3626.2%10.2%—K 20.4% · BB 11.4% · FIP 4.22
202227AASTL100125.405.2425.0%7.7%—K 20.2% · BB 8.5% · FIP 6.02
202328No MLB games played
202429No MLB games played
202530No MLB games played
202631No MLB games played
Contract
No contract data on file.
ERA—
FIP—
K%—
BB%—
K-BB%—
Proj IP—
Contract

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
201722ROK MLEBillings Mustangs21032143321830%1.515.2%15.7%-0.5%2.9%3.625.42—
201722ROK RAWBillings Mustangs21032143321830%1.522.4%12.6%9.8%2.1%3.624.00—
201823A MLEDayton Dragons46072304671260%1.616.3%4.7%11.7%2.3%3.253.59—
201823A RAWDayton Dragons46072304671260%1.622.0%3.9%18.1%2.0%3.252.82—
201924MIX MLE2 levels450592515216100%1.316.4%7.1%9.3%4.8%3.345.25—
201924MIX RAW2 levels450592515216100%1.320.7%6.4%14.3%4.0%3.344.35—
202126MIX MLE2 levels26043187491940%1.620.4%11.4%9.0%2.5%3.594.22—
202126MIX RAW2 levels26043187491940%1.626.2%10.2%16.0%2.1%3.593.36—
202227AA MLESpringfield Cardinals100125213430%1.220.2%8.5%11.8%6.5%5.406.02—
202227AA RAWSpringfield Cardinals100125213430%1.225.0%7.7%17.3%5.8%5.405.24—
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— MLE148021893716180310%1.517.2%8.6%8.6%3.4%3.514.57—
/ 200 IP— MLE136020086014874290%1.517.2%8.6%8.6%3.4%3.514.57-0.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2022 AASpringfield Cardinals · 12 IPFIP 5.13 → 6.02 (+0.89)K% 25.0% → 20.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF25.00%—×0.81020.25%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.69%—×1.1008.46%
HR / BF /BF5.77%÷1.069×1.2006.48%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 114).

Result: FIP 5.13 → 6.02, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 A+Peoria Chiefs · 24 IPFIP 2.90 → 4.04 (+1.14)K% 35.2% → 27.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF35.24%—×0.77027.13%
BB% (unintentional) /BF9.52%—×1.15010.95%
HR / BF /BF2.86%÷1.063×1.2503.36%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 113).

Result: FIP 2.90 → 4.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AASpringfield Cardinals · 18 IPFIP 3.92 → 4.44 (+0.52)K% 14.6% → 11.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF14.63%—×0.81011.85%
BB% (unintentional) /BF10.98%—×1.10012.07%
HR / BF /BF1.22%÷0.990×1.2001.48%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).

Result: FIP 3.92 → 4.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 36 IPFIP 5.26 → 6.20 (+0.94)K% 16.1% → 13.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF16.07%—×0.81013.02%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.14%—×1.1007.86%
HR / BF /BF4.76%÷0.979×1.2005.83%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).

Result: FIP 5.26 → 6.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 A+Daytona Tortugas · 23 IPFIP 2.49 → 3.35 (+0.86)K% 30.1% → 23.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF30.12%—×0.77023.19%
BB% (unintentional) /BF4.82%—×1.1505.54%
HR / BF /BF2.41%÷1.101×1.2502.74%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 120).

Result: FIP 2.49 → 3.35, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 ADayton Dragons · 72 IPFIP 2.82 → 3.59 (+0.77)K% 22.0% → 16.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF22.04%—×0.74016.31%
BB% (unintentional) /BF3.95%—×1.1804.66%
HR / BF /BF1.97%÷1.103×1.3002.33%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 121).

Result: FIP 2.82 → 3.59, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 ROKBillings Mustangs · 32 IPFIP 3.96 → 5.42 (+1.46)K% 22.4% → 15.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF22.38%—×0.68015.22%
BB% (unintentional) /BF12.59%—×1.25015.73%
HR / BF /BF2.10%÷1.000×1.4002.94%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 3.96 → 5.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).