Melkis Hernández
P Lake County Captains| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19 | MIX2 levels | 18 | 8 | 60 | 4.18 | 2.62 | 25.6% | 10.2% | — | K 17.8% · BB 12.3% · FIP 3.78 |
| 2025 | 20 | ALynchburg Hil… | 25 | 21 | 114 | 3.64 | 3.21 | 24.6% | 10.8% | — | K 18.2% · BB 12.8% · FIP 4.07 |
| 2026 | 21 | A+CLE | 30 | 6 | 83 | 4.54 | 3.95 | 25.0% | 18.2% | — | K 19.2% · BB 20.9% · FIP 4.79 |
| 2027PROJ | 22 | MLBCLE | — | — | 0 | 5.68 | 5.68 | 17.9% | 18.7% | — | |
| 2028PROJ49% MLB | 23 | MLBCLE | 6 | 6 | 38 | 5.36 | 5.24 | 19.0% | 15.9% | 0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ70% MLB | 24 | MLBCLE | 8 | 8 | 53 | 5.08 | 4.95 | 19.8% | 14.1% | 0.3 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL CLE Blue | 12 | 11 | 33 | 166 | 33 | 38 | 1 | 92% | 2.8 | 13.5% | 28.6% | -15.1% | 0.7% | 5.94 | 5.99 | — |
| 2022 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL CLE Blue | 12 | 11 | 33 | 166 | 33 | 38 | 1 | 92% | 2.8 | 19.9% | 22.9% | -3.0% | 0.6% | 5.94 | 4.93 | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Guardians Blue | 10 | 10 | 44 | 182 | 44 | 19 | 2 | 100% | 4.4 | 16.4% | 13.0% | 3.4% | 1.5% | 3.71 | 4.18 | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Guardians Blue | 10 | 10 | 44 | 182 | 44 | 19 | 2 | 100% | 4.4 | 24.2% | 10.4% | 13.7% | 1.1% | 3.71 | 2.99 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 18 | 8 | 60 | 266 | 68 | 27 | 2 | 44% | 3.4 | 17.8% | 12.3% | 5.6% | 1.2% | 4.18 | 3.78 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 18 | 8 | 60 | 266 | 68 | 27 | 2 | 44% | 3.4 | 17.8% | 12.3% | 5.6% | 1.2% | 4.18 | 3.78 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 18 | 8 | 60 | 266 | 68 | 27 | 2 | 44% | 3.4 | 25.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | 0.8% | 4.18 | 2.62 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | 25 | 21 | 114 | 472 | 116 | 51 | 7 | 84% | 4.5 | 18.2% | 12.8% | 5.4% | 1.6% | 3.64 | 4.07 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | 25 | 21 | 114 | 472 | 116 | 51 | 7 | 84% | 4.5 | 18.2% | 12.8% | 5.4% | 1.6% | 3.64 | 4.07 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A RAW | Lynchburg Hillcats | 25 | 21 | 114 | 472 | 116 | 51 | 7 | 84% | 4.5 | 24.6% | 10.8% | 13.8% | 1.5% | 3.64 | 3.21 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | 30 | 6 | 83 | 412 | 103 | 75 | 4 | 20% | 2.8 | 19.2% | 20.9% | -1.7% | 1.2% | 4.54 | 4.79 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | 30 | 6 | 83 | 412 | 103 | 75 | 4 | 20% | 2.8 | 19.2% | 20.9% | -1.7% | 1.2% | 4.54 | 4.79 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ RAW | Lake County Captains | 30 | 6 | 83 | 412 | 103 | 75 | 4 | 20% | 2.8 | 25.0% | 18.2% | 6.8% | 1.0% | 4.54 | 3.95 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB | CLE | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.9% | 18.7% | -0.8% | 2.4% | 5.68 | 5.68 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | CLE | 12 | 12 | 76 | 323 | 61 | 51 | 8 | 100% | 6.4 | 19.0% | 15.9% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 5.36 | 5.24 | +0.1 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB MLE | CLE | 12 | 12 | 76 | 323 | 64 | 46 | 8 | 100% | 6.4 | 19.8% | 14.1% | 5.7% | 2.5% | 5.08 | 4.95 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB MLE | CLE | 10 | 10 | 68 | 289 | 59 | 38 | 7 | 100% | 6.8 | 20.3% | 13.0% | 7.3% | 2.5% | 4.88 | 4.77 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB MLE | CLE | 10 | 10 | 68 | 287 | 59 | 37 | 7 | 100% | 6.8 | 20.5% | 12.8% | 7.7% | 2.5% | 4.79 | 4.74 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB MLE | CLE | 10 | 10 | 66 | 279 | 57 | 36 | 7 | 100% | 6.6 | 20.5% | 12.9% | 7.6% | 2.5% | 4.78 | 4.78 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB MLE | CLE | 10 | 10 | 63 | 266 | 54 | 35 | 7 | 100% | 6.3 | 20.4% | 13.1% | 7.3% | 2.6% | 4.83 | 4.86 | +0.4 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB MLE | CLE | 9 | 9 | 59 | 248 | 50 | 33 | 7 | 100% | 6.5 | 20.2% | 13.3% | 6.9% | 2.8% | 4.93 | 4.99 | +0.3 |
| 2035 | 30 | MLB MLE | CLE | 8 | 8 | 54 | 228 | 45 | 31 | 7 | 100% | 6.7 | 19.8% | 13.6% | 6.2% | 3.0% | 5.07 | 5.17 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | CLE | 6 | 6 | 38 | 160 | 31 | 26 | 4 | 100% | 6.3 | 19.0% | 15.9% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 5.36 | 5.24 | +0.1 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB CTX | CLE | 8 | 8 | 53 | 224 | 44 | 32 | 6 | 100% | 6.6 | 19.8% | 14.1% | 5.7% | 2.5% | 5.08 | 4.95 | +0.3 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB CTX | CLE | 9 | 9 | 56 | 236 | 48 | 31 | 6 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.3% | 13.0% | 7.3% | 2.5% | 4.88 | 4.77 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB CTX | CLE | 9 | 9 | 59 | 249 | 51 | 32 | 6 | 100% | 6.6 | 20.5% | 12.8% | 7.7% | 2.5% | 4.79 | 4.74 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB CTX | CLE | 9 | 9 | 60 | 253 | 52 | 33 | 6 | 100% | 6.7 | 20.5% | 12.9% | 7.6% | 2.5% | 4.78 | 4.78 | +0.4 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB CTX | CLE | 9 | 9 | 58 | 245 | 50 | 32 | 6 | 100% | 6.4 | 20.4% | 13.1% | 7.3% | 2.6% | 4.83 | 4.86 | +0.4 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB CTX | CLE | 8 | 8 | 55 | 232 | 47 | 31 | 6 | 100% | 6.9 | 20.2% | 13.3% | 6.9% | 2.8% | 4.93 | 4.99 | +0.3 |
| 2035 | 30 | MLB CTX | CLE | 8 | 8 | 50 | 211 | 42 | 29 | 6 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.8% | 13.6% | 6.2% | 3.0% | 5.07 | 5.17 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 65 | 65 | 429 | 1811 | 364 | 244 | 47 | 100% | 6.6 | 20.1% | 13.5% | 6.6% | 2.6% | 4.94 | 4.53 | +4.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 30 | 30 | 200 | 844 | 170 | 114 | 22 | 100% | 6.6 | 20.1% | 13.5% | 6.6% | 2.6% | 4.94 | 4.53 | +2.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 95 | 56 | 334 | 1498 | 265 | 250 | 20 | 59% | 3.5 | 17.7% | 16.7% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 4.20 | 4.45 | +2.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 57 | 33 | 200 | 896 | 158 | 150 | 12 | 59% | 3.5 | 17.7% | 16.7% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 4.20 | 4.45 | +1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Lake County Captains · 83 IPFIP 3.83 → 4.79 (+0.96)K% 25.0% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.770 | 19.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.20% | — | ×1.150 | 20.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.97% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 1.21% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.83 → 4.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ALynchburg Hillcats · 114 IPFIP 3.21 → 4.07 (+0.87)K% 24.6% → 18.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.58% | — | ×0.740 | 18.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.81% | — | ×1.180 | 12.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.48% | ÷1.184 | ×1.300 | 1.63% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 137).
Result: FIP 3.21 → 4.07, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKACL Guardians · 38 IPFIP 1.45 → 2.47 (+1.02)K% 29.8% → 20.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.81% | — | ×0.680 | 20.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.83% | — | ×1.250 | 8.54% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.984 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 1.45 → 2.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ALynchburg Hillcats · 22 IPFIP 4.47 → 5.80 (+1.33)K% 19.0% → 14.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.05% | — | ×0.740 | 14.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.24% | — | ×1.180 | 17.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.90% | ÷0.844 | ×1.300 | 2.93% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 4.47 → 5.80, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Guardians Blue · 44 IPFIP 2.98 → 4.18 (+1.20)K% 24.2% → 16.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.18% | — | ×0.680 | 16.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.44% | — | ×1.250 | 13.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.10% | ÷1.035 | ×1.400 | 1.49% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 2.98 → 4.18, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL CLE Blue · 33 IPFIP 4.65 → 5.99 (+1.34)K% 19.9% → 13.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.88% | — | ×0.680 | 13.52% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 22.89% | — | ×1.250 | 28.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.60% | ÷1.128 | ×1.400 | 0.75% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 126).
Result: FIP 4.65 → 5.99, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.0 | 66 | 19.8% | 14.2% | 1.00 | 5.05 |
| Dwayne Henry ('84-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.7 | 67 | 23.8%* | 14.2%* | 0.90* | 5.02* |
| Doug Bochtler ('00) | 1.3 | 65 | 18.6% | 14.4% | 1.25 | 4.57 |
| Mike Mohler ('01) | 2.1 | 60 | 15.0% | 12.4% | 0.97 | 4.99 |
| Brian Bruney ('12) | 1.3 | 43 | 21.2% | 15.8% | 0.94 | 4.68 |
| Gene Harris ('89-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 40 | 20.0%* | 12.5%* | 0.98* | 4.96* |
| Fred Lasher ('63-'71, -1 WAR*) | 1.0 | 50 | 21.5%* | 11.9%* | 1.05* | 4.68* |