Bradgley Rodriguez
P San Diego Padres| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20 | MIX3 levels | 45 | 0 | 61 | 2.64 | 2.59 | 29.5% | 12.2% | — | K 22.0% · BB 14.5% · FIP 3.72 |
| 2025 | 21 | MIX3 levels | 40 | 0 | 44 | 2.84 | 2.49 | 26.0% | 9.9% | 1.1 | K 20.8% · BB 10.3% · FIP 3.11 |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 69 | 4 | 75 | 2.16 | 2.71 | 27.0% | 6.2% | 1.7 | K 26.9% · BB 6.3% · FIP 2.69 |
| 2027PROJ | 23 | MLBSD | 48 | 0 | 50 | 3.20 | 3.28 | 29.3% | 7.9% | 0.8 | |
| 2028PROJ88% MLB | 24 | MLBSD | 51 | 0 | 54 | 3.32 | 3.32 | 29.3% | 7.8% | 0.8 | |
| 2029PROJ91% MLB | 25 | MLBSD | 42 | 0 | 44 | 3.36 | 3.33 | 29.2% | 7.8% | 0.7 |
Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Padres | 10 | 3 | 25 | 107 | 27 | 16 | 3 | 30% | 2.5 | 17.2% | 18.7% | -1.5% | 3.3% | 6.20 | 5.82 | — |
| 2021 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Padres | 10 | 3 | 25 | 107 | 27 | 16 | 3 | 30% | 2.5 | 25.2% | 15.0% | 10.3% | 2.8% | 6.20 | 4.44 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 45 | 0 | 61 | 254 | 75 | 31 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 22.0% | 14.5% | 7.5% | 1.2% | 2.64 | 3.72 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 45 | 0 | 61 | 254 | 75 | 31 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 22.0% | 14.5% | 7.5% | 1.2% | 2.64 | 3.72 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 45 | 0 | 61 | 254 | 75 | 31 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 29.5% | 12.2% | 17.3% | 0.8% | 2.64 | 2.59 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 40 | 0 | 44 | 181 | 47 | 18 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.8% | 10.3% | 10.5% | 0.8% | 2.84 | 3.11 | +0.8 |
| 2025 | 21 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 40 | 0 | 44 | 181 | 47 | 18 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.8% | 10.3% | 10.5% | 0.8% | 2.84 | 3.11 | +0.8 |
| 2025 | 21 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 40 | 0 | 44 | 181 | 47 | 18 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 26.0% | 9.9% | 16.0% | 0.6% | 2.84 | 2.49 | +1.1 |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 69 | 4 | 75 | 304 | 82 | 19 | 6 | 6% | 1.1 | 26.9% | 6.3% | 20.6% | 1.9% | 2.16 | 2.69 | +1.7 |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 69 | 4 | 75 | 304 | 82 | 19 | 6 | 6% | 1.1 | 26.9% | 6.3% | 20.6% | 1.9% | 2.16 | 2.69 | +1.7 |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 69 | 4 | 75 | 304 | 82 | 19 | 6 | 6% | 1.1 | 27.0% | 6.2% | 20.7% | 2.0% | 2.16 | 2.71 | +1.7 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 75 | 4 | 82 | 332 | 90 | 21 | 6 | 5% | 1.1 | 27.1% | 6.3% | 20.8% | 1.8% | 2.09 | 2.62 | +1.9 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB | SD | 48 | 0 | 50 | 211 | 62 | 17 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 29.3% | 7.9% | 21.4% | 2.3% | 3.20 | 3.28 | +0.8 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | SD | 58 | 0 | 61 | 258 | 75 | 20 | 6 | 0% | 1.1 | 29.3% | 7.8% | 21.5% | 2.3% | 3.29 | 3.29 | +1.0 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | SD | 46 | 0 | 48 | 205 | 60 | 16 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 29.2% | 7.8% | 21.5% | 2.4% | 3.33 | 3.30 | +0.7 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | SD | 45 | 0 | 47 | 199 | 58 | 16 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 29.2% | 7.8% | 21.4% | 2.4% | 3.35 | 3.33 | +0.7 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | SD | 43 | 0 | 45 | 190 | 55 | 15 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 29.0% | 7.9% | 21.1% | 2.5% | 3.39 | 3.39 | +0.6 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | SD | 40 | 0 | 42 | 178 | 51 | 14 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 28.9% | 8.1% | 20.8% | 2.6% | 3.44 | 3.48 | +0.6 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | SD | 35 | 0 | 37 | 155 | 44 | 13 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 28.3% | 8.3% | 20.0% | 2.7% | 3.56 | 3.64 | +0.4 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | SD | 51 | 0 | 54 | 228 | 67 | 18 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 29.3% | 7.8% | 21.5% | 2.4% | 3.32 | 3.32 | +0.8 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | SD | 42 | 0 | 44 | 186 | 54 | 14 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 29.2% | 7.8% | 21.5% | 2.4% | 3.36 | 3.33 | +0.7 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | SD | 42 | 0 | 44 | 186 | 54 | 15 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 29.2% | 7.8% | 21.4% | 2.5% | 3.38 | 3.36 | +0.7 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | SD | 40 | 0 | 42 | 177 | 51 | 14 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 29.0% | 7.9% | 21.1% | 2.5% | 3.42 | 3.42 | +0.6 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | SD | 38 | 0 | 40 | 169 | 49 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 28.9% | 8.1% | 20.8% | 2.6% | 3.48 | 3.52 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | SD | 33 | 0 | 35 | 148 | 42 | 12 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 28.3% | 8.3% | 20.0% | 2.8% | 3.60 | 3.68 | +0.4 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 321 | 4 | 340 | 1424 | 407 | 108 | 34 | 1% | 1.1 | 28.6% | 7.6% | 21.0% | 2.4% | 3.10 | 2.94 | +6.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 189 | 2 | 200 | 837 | 239 | 63 | 20 | 1% | 1.1 | 28.6% | 7.6% | 21.0% | 2.4% | 3.10 | 2.94 | +3.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 164 | 7 | 205 | 846 | 194 | 95 | 14 | 4% | 1.3 | 22.9% | 11.2% | 11.7% | 1.6% | 2.94 | 3.49 | +5.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 160 | 7 | 200 | 824 | 189 | 92 | 14 | 4% | 1.3 | 22.9% | 11.2% | 11.7% | 1.6% | 2.94 | 3.49 | +3.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AASan Antonio Missions · 22 IPFIP 1.49 → 2.28 (+0.79)K% 34.8% → 28.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.83% | — | ×0.810 | 28.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.62% | — | ×1.100 | 6.18% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.12% | ÷0.950 | ×1.200 | 1.42% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 1.49 → 2.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAEl Paso Chihuahuas · 14 IPFIP 4.42 → 4.32 (−0.09)K% 11.5% → 9.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 11.48% | — | ×0.860 | 9.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.03% | — | ×0.900 | 16.23% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.981 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 4.42 → 4.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Fort Wayne TinCaps · 42 IPFIP 3.22 → 4.20 (+0.98)K% 25.7% → 19.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.71% | — | ×0.770 | 19.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.14% | — | ×1.150 | 15.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.14% | ÷0.916 | ×1.250 | 1.56% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 3.22 → 4.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AASan Antonio Missions · 14 IPFIP 1.62 → 2.33 (+0.71)K% 35.0% → 28.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.00% | — | ×0.810 | 28.35% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.67% | — | ×1.100 | 12.83% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.953 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 1.62 → 2.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKDSL Padres · 25 IPFIP 4.40 → 5.82 (+1.41)K% 25.2% → 17.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.23% | — | ×0.680 | 17.16% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.95% | — | ×1.250 | 18.69% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.80% | ÷1.199 | ×1.400 | 3.27% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 140).
Result: FIP 4.40 → 5.82, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.1 | 53 | 28.7% | 7.7% | 0.90 | 3.11 |
| Rafael Soriano ('15) | 3.2 | 64 | 24.9% | 7.7% | 0.88 | 2.89 |
| Keone Kela ('21) | 1.1 | 45 | 29.9% | 9.2% | 1.03 | 3.33 |
| Kelvin Herrera ('20) | 2.6 | 64 | 23.8% | 7.5% | 0.88 | 3.21 |
| Mike Schooler ('88-'93, 5 WAR*) | 1.5 | 49 | 26.9%* | 8.0%* | 0.96* | 3.68* |
| Joe Sambito ('76-'87, 8 WAR*) | 3.1 | 70 | 26.8%* | 7.5%* | 1.06* | 3.65* |
| Jeff Montgomery ('87-'99, 19 WAR*) | 4.3 | 72 | 26.2%* | 7.6%* | 1.01* | 3.16* |