Jonathan Santucci
P Binghamton Rumble Ponies| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 23 | 118 | 3.06 | 2.79 | 28.7% | 8.5% | — | K 22.6% · BB 9.6% · FIP 3.62 |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 27 | 27 | 125 | 4.03 | 3.12 | 30.8% | 12.5% | — | K 25.3% · BB 12.9% · FIP 3.78 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBNYM | 2 | 2 | 9 | 4.36 | 4.36 | 25.3% | 12.3% | 0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ46% MLB | 25 | MLBNYM | 10 | 10 | 57 | 4.28 | 4.24 | 25.4% | 11.3% | 0.8 | |
| 2029PROJ68% MLB | 26 | MLBNYM | 13 | 13 | 78 | 4.24 | 4.22 | 25.3% | 11.0% | 1.1 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 23 | 118 | 481 | 138 | 41 | 9 | 92% | 4.7 | 22.6% | 9.6% | 13.0% | 2.2% | 3.06 | 3.62 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 23 | 118 | 481 | 138 | 41 | 9 | 92% | 4.7 | 22.6% | 9.6% | 13.0% | 2.2% | 3.06 | 3.62 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 23 | 118 | 481 | 138 | 41 | 9 | 92% | 4.7 | 28.7% | 8.5% | 20.2% | 1.9% | 3.06 | 2.79 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 27 | 125 | 530 | 163 | 66 | 10 | 100% | 4.6 | 25.3% | 12.9% | 12.4% | 2.2% | 4.03 | 3.78 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 27 | 125 | 530 | 163 | 66 | 10 | 100% | 4.6 | 25.3% | 12.9% | 12.4% | 2.2% | 4.03 | 3.78 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 27 | 27 | 125 | 530 | 163 | 66 | 10 | 100% | 4.6 | 30.8% | 12.5% | 18.3% | 1.9% | 4.03 | 3.12 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | NYM | 2 | 2 | 9 | 38 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 100% | 4.5 | 25.3% | 12.3% | 13.0% | 2.7% | 4.36 | 4.36 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | NYM | 21 | 21 | 123 | 518 | 132 | 58 | 14 | 100% | 5.8 | 25.4% | 11.3% | 14.1% | 2.7% | 4.28 | 4.24 | +1.7 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | NYM | 19 | 19 | 115 | 485 | 123 | 53 | 13 | 100% | 6.0 | 25.3% | 11.0% | 14.4% | 2.7% | 4.24 | 4.22 | +1.6 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | NYM | 18 | 18 | 110 | 463 | 117 | 50 | 13 | 100% | 6.1 | 25.2% | 10.9% | 14.3% | 2.8% | 4.25 | 4.26 | +1.5 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | NYM | 17 | 17 | 104 | 440 | 110 | 48 | 13 | 100% | 6.1 | 25.0% | 10.9% | 14.0% | 2.9% | 4.30 | 4.34 | +1.3 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | NYM | 16 | 16 | 97 | 410 | 101 | 46 | 12 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.7% | 11.2% | 13.5% | 3.0% | 4.40 | 4.47 | +1.1 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | NYM | 15 | 15 | 88 | 372 | 91 | 43 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 24.4% | 11.5% | 12.9% | 3.2% | 4.55 | 4.65 | +0.8 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB MLE | NYM | 13 | 13 | 78 | 331 | 79 | 39 | 11 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.0% | 11.8% | 12.1% | 3.5% | 4.73 | 4.85 | +0.5 |
| 2035 | 32 | MLB MLE | NYM | 12 | 12 | 69 | 291 | 69 | 36 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 23.5% | 12.2% | 11.3% | 3.7% | 4.94 | 5.08 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | NYM | 10 | 10 | 57 | 241 | 61 | 27 | 6 | 100% | 5.7 | 25.4% | 11.3% | 14.1% | 2.7% | 4.28 | 4.24 | +0.8 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | NYM | 13 | 13 | 78 | 329 | 83 | 36 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 25.3% | 11.0% | 14.4% | 2.7% | 4.24 | 4.22 | +1.1 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | NYM | 14 | 14 | 86 | 363 | 91 | 40 | 10 | 100% | 6.1 | 25.2% | 10.9% | 14.3% | 2.8% | 4.25 | 4.26 | +1.2 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | NYM | 15 | 15 | 88 | 372 | 93 | 41 | 11 | 100% | 5.9 | 25.0% | 10.9% | 14.0% | 2.9% | 4.30 | 4.34 | +1.1 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | NYM | 14 | 14 | 85 | 359 | 89 | 40 | 11 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.7% | 11.2% | 13.5% | 3.0% | 4.40 | 4.47 | +0.9 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | NYM | 13 | 13 | 79 | 334 | 81 | 38 | 11 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.4% | 11.5% | 12.9% | 3.2% | 4.55 | 4.65 | +0.7 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB CTX | NYM | 12 | 12 | 72 | 304 | 73 | 36 | 10 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.0% | 11.8% | 12.1% | 3.4% | 4.73 | 4.85 | +0.5 |
| 2035 | 32 | MLB CTX | NYM | 11 | 11 | 64 | 270 | 64 | 33 | 10 | 100% | 5.8 | 23.5% | 12.2% | 11.3% | 3.7% | 4.93 | 5.07 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 102 | 102 | 610 | 2574 | 636 | 291 | 78 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.7% | 11.3% | 13.4% | 3.0% | 4.44 | 4.12 | +9.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 209 | 95 | 26 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.7% | 11.3% | 13.4% | 3.0% | 4.44 | 4.12 | +3.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 52 | 50 | 243 | 1011 | 243 | 115 | 22 | 96% | 4.7 | 24.0% | 11.3% | 12.7% | 2.2% | 3.56 | 3.70 | +8.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 43 | 41 | 200 | 833 | 200 | 94 | 18 | 96% | 4.7 | 24.0% | 11.3% | 12.7% | 2.2% | 3.56 | 3.70 | +2.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 91 IPFIP 2.50 → 3.29 (+0.78)K% 32.0% → 25.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.00% | — | ×0.810 | 25.92% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.00% | — | ×1.100 | 13.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.07% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 1.28% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.50 → 3.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAASyracuse Mets · 34 IPFIP 4.60 → 4.97 (+0.37)K% 27.7% → 23.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.74% | — | ×0.860 | 23.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.55% | — | ×0.900 | 12.19% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.87% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 4.26% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.60 → 4.97, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Brooklyn Cyclones · 68 IPFIP 3.25 → 4.14 (+0.89)K% 26.4% → 20.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.41% | — | ×0.770 | 20.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.10% | — | ×1.150 | 9.31% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.46% | ÷1.073 | ×1.250 | 2.87% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 115).
Result: FIP 3.25 → 4.14, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 50 IPFIP 2.11 → 2.86 (+0.75)K% 32.0% → 25.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.98% | — | ×0.810 | 25.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.14% | — | ×1.100 | 10.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.02% | ÷0.990 | ×1.200 | 1.23% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 2.11 → 2.86, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 4.6 | 103 | 24.9% | 11.4% | 1.14 | 4.41 |
| Wayne Twitchell ('70-'79, 4 WAR*) | 5.3 | 133 | 24.2%* | 11.3%* | 1.16* | 4.56* |
| Bobby Castillo ('77-'85, 5 WAR*) | 3.4 | 86 | 22.3%* | 11.3%* | 1.23* | 4.27* |
| Juan Berenguer ('78-'92, 9 WAR*) | 6.0 | 100 | 26.4%* | 11.6%* | 1.13* | 4.14* |
| Brad Peacock ('21) | 2.8 | 93 | 24.7% | 10.1% | 1.27 | 4.11 |
| Jonathan Sánchez ('13) | 3.9 | 112 | 22.8% | 12.5% | 1.04 | 4.70 |
| Darren Dreifort ('04) | 4.4 | 97 | 21.2% | 10.3% | 0.93 | 4.36 |