Yordys Valdes
SS Columbus Clippers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 21 | A+CLE | 317 | .236/.292/.325 | 3 | 16 | 43 | — | .205/.251/.276 |
| 2024 | 22 | AACLE | 411 | .231/.318/.339 | 8 | 19 | 61 | — | .215/.281/.301 |
| 2025 | 23 | AAACLE | 337 | .187/.227/.302 | 5 | 10 | 9 | — | .154/.184/.235 |
| 2027PROJ10% MLB | 25 | MLBCLE | 21 | .170/.216/.253 | 0 | 1 | 30 | -0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ35% MLB | 26 | MLBCLE | 84 | .174/.222/.265 | 1 | 2 | 35 | -0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 27 | MLBCLE | 120 | .177/.226/.269 | 2 | 3 | 38 | -0.5 |
Tools · ContractCON 30 / POW 40
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 17 | ROK | AZL Indians Red | — | 181 | 162 | 29 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 53 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 179 | 253 | 247 | 500 | 68 | 250 | 29 | 9 | 230 | -12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | A | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 349 | 312 | 66 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 24 | 92 | 3 | 16 | 4 | 212 | 274 | 263 | 537 | 51 | 293 | 26 | 7 | 243 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A+ | Lake County Captains | — | 40 | 37 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 243 | 282 | 270 | 552 | 27 | 321 | 25 | 5 | 248 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 432 | 387 | 94 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 37 | 89 | 3 | 13 | 7 | 243 | 314 | 307 | 621 | 65 | 305 | 21 | 9 | 284 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ | Lake County Captains | — | 317 | 292 | 69 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 82 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 236 | 292 | 325 | 617 | 89 | 317 | 26 | 6 | 279 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | AA | Akron RubberDucks | — | 411 | 360 | 83 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 44 | 123 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 231 | 318 | 339 | 657 | 108 | 326 | 30 | 11 | 297 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AAA | Columbus Clippers | — | 337 | 315 | 59 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 108 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 187 | 227 | 302 | 528 | 114 | 263 | 32 | 4 | 233 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | AZL Indians Red | — | 181 | 168 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 76 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 119 | 169 | 161 | 329 | 42 | 195 | 42 | 6 | 150 | -12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 349 | 319 | 58 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 124 | 3 | 16 | 4 | 182 | 230 | 226 | 456 | 44 | 272 | 36 | 5 | 199 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | — | 40 | 38 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 211 | 231 | 237 | 468 | 26 | 304 | 32 | 2 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 432 | 397 | 85 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 124 | 3 | 13 | 7 | 214 | 269 | 264 | 534 | 50 | 298 | 29 | 6 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | — | 317 | 297 | 61 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 101 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 205 | 251 | 276 | 527 | 71 | 297 | 32 | 4 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | — | 411 | 372 | 80 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 32 | 153 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 215 | 281 | 301 | 582 | 86 | 337 | 37 | 8 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 337 | 319 | 49 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 135 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 154 | 184 | 235 | 419 | 82 | 241 | 40 | 3 | 182 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | AZL Indians Red | — | 181 | 168 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 76 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 119 | 169 | 161 | 329 | 42 | 207 | 42 | 6 | 150 | -12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK RAW | AZL Indians Red | — | 181 | 162 | 29 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 53 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 179 | 253 | 247 | 500 | 68 | 250 | 29 | 9 | 230 | -12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 349 | 319 | 58 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 124 | 3 | 16 | 4 | 182 | 230 | 226 | 456 | 44 | 290 | 36 | 5 | 199 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | A RAW | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 349 | 312 | 66 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 24 | 92 | 3 | 16 | 4 | 212 | 274 | 263 | 537 | 51 | 293 | 26 | 7 | 243 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 472 | 435 | 94 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 136 | 3 | 13 | 8 | 216 | 268 | 264 | 533 | 48 | 306 | 29 | 6 | 238 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 472 | 424 | 103 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 39 | 99 | 3 | 13 | 8 | 243 | 311 | 304 | 615 | 61 | 307 | 21 | 8 | 281 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | — | 317 | 297 | 61 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 101 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 205 | 251 | 276 | 527 | 71 | 303 | 32 | 4 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ RAW | Lake County Captains | — | 317 | 292 | 69 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 82 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 236 | 292 | 325 | 617 | 89 | 317 | 26 | 6 | 279 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | — | 411 | 372 | 80 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 32 | 153 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 215 | 281 | 301 | 582 | 86 | 346 | 37 | 8 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | AA RAW | Akron RubberDucks | — | 411 | 360 | 83 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 44 | 123 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 231 | 318 | 339 | 657 | 108 | 326 | 30 | 11 | 297 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 337 | 319 | 49 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 135 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 154 | 184 | 235 | 419 | 82 | 250 | 40 | 3 | 182 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AAA RAW | Columbus Clippers | — | 337 | 315 | 59 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 108 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 187 | 227 | 302 | 528 | 114 | 263 | 32 | 4 | 233 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | AZL Indians Red | — | 181 | 169 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 76 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 118 | 169 | 160 | 328 | 41 | 195 | 42 | 6 | 150 | -12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 349 | 326 | 58 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 124 | 3 | 16 | 4 | 178 | 230 | 221 | 451 | 43 | 272 | 36 | 5 | 199 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 472 | 438 | 94 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 136 | 3 | 13 | 8 | 215 | 268 | 263 | 531 | 48 | 299 | 29 | 6 | 238 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | — | 317 | 296 | 61 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 101 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 206 | 251 | 277 | 528 | 71 | 297 | 32 | 4 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | — | 411 | 374 | 80 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 32 | 153 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 214 | 281 | 299 | 580 | 86 | 337 | 37 | 8 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 337 | 322 | 49 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 135 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 152 | 184 | 233 | 417 | 81 | 241 | 40 | 3 | 182 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | — | 411 | 374 | 80 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 32 | 153 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 214 | 281 | 299 | 580 | 86 | 337 | 37 | 8 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 337 | 322 | 49 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 135 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 152 | 184 | 233 | 417 | 81 | 241 | 40 | 3 | 182 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB MLE | CLE | 10% | 380 | 356 | 61 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 135 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 170 | 216 | 254 | 470 | 84 | 254 | 36 | 5 | 213 | 30 | -32 | +1 | +0 | +4 | +8 | -0.9 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB CTX | CLE | 10% | 21 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 170 | 216 | 253 | 469 | 83 | 254 | 33 | 5 | 212 | 30 | -2 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | CLE | 35% | 241 | 225 | 40 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 84 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 174 | 222 | 266 | 488 | 91 | 256 | 35 | 5 | 221 | 35 | -19 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +5 | -1.0 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | CLE | 44% | 272 | 254 | 45 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 93 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 177 | 226 | 270 | 497 | 93 | 257 | 34 | 5 | 225 | 38 | -20 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +6 | -1.0 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | CLE | 35% | 84 | 79 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 174 | 222 | 265 | 487 | 90 | 256 | 35 | 5 | 220 | 35 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +2 | -0.3 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | CLE | 44% | 120 | 112 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 41 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 177 | 226 | 269 | 496 | 92 | 258 | 34 | 5 | 224 | 38 | -9 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +3 | -0.5 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 204 | 191 | 33 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 70 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 173 | 222 | 257 | 478 | 84 | 252 | 34 | 5 | 223 | 34 | -15 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +4 | -0.8 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 609 | 105 | 22 | 0 | 10 | 32 | 223 | 6 | 16 | 3 | 172 | 221 | 258 | 479 | 85 | 251 | 34 | 5 | 223 | 34 | -49 | +2 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -2.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2790 | 2585 | 481 | 81 | 14 | 25 | 146 | 977 | 21 | 107 | 25 | 186 | 235 | 257 | 493 | 71 | 285 | 35 | 5 | 218 | 34 | -56 | +2 | +0 | +8 | +16 | -3.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 602 | 112 | 19 | 3 | 6 | 34 | 228 | 5 | 25 | 6 | 186 | 236 | 257 | 493 | 71 | 285 | 35 | 5 | 218 | 34 | -50 | +2 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -2.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAAColumbus Clippers · 337 PAwOBA .228 → .182 (−47)K% 32.0% → 40.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.05% | ÷0.956 | ×1.200 | — | — | 40.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.86% | ÷1.014 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.048 | 2.75% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.89% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.048 | 0.88% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.91% | ÷0.997 | ×0.930 | ×0.996 | ×1.048 | 16.47% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.21% | ÷1.064 | ×0.830 | ×0.996 | ×1.048 | 6.69% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.97% | ÷1.042 | ×0.970 | ×0.996 | ×1.048 | 0.94% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.42% | ÷1.093 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.048 | 1.62% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 99, 2B 113, 3B 108, K 91, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.996.
Result: wOBA .228 → .182; ISO .114 → .081; BABIP .263 → .241. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAkron RubberDucks · 411 PAwOBA .291 → .258 (−33)K% 29.9% → 37.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.93% | ÷0.980 | ×1.220 | — | — | 37.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.71% | ÷0.987 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.027 | 7.80% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.49% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.027 | 0.42% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.58% | ÷0.993 | ×0.970 | ×1.047 | ×1.027 | 27.93% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.80% | ÷0.944 | ×0.860 | ×1.047 | ×1.027 | 3.72% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.27% | ÷1.023 | ×0.950 | ×1.047 | ×1.027 | 1.26% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.38% | ÷0.966 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.027 | 2.80% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 99, 2B 89, 3B 105, K 96, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.047.
Result: wOBA .291 → .258; ISO .108 → .091; BABIP .326 → .337. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Lake County Captains · 317 PAwOBA .273 → .232 (−41)K% 25.9% → 32.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.87% | ÷1.028 | ×1.270 | — | — | 31.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.99% | ÷0.971 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 4.43% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.26% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 1.01% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.81% | ÷1.011 | ×0.920 | ×1.025 | ×1.012 | 22.47% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.14% | ÷0.900 | ×0.810 | ×1.025 | ×1.012 | 6.67% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.48% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×1.025 | ×1.012 | 0.37% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.43% | ÷1.060 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 1.09% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 102, 2B 80, 3B 130, K 106, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.025.
Result: wOBA .273 → .232; ISO .089 → .073; BABIP .317 → .297. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ALynchburg Hillcats · 432 PAwOBA .279 → .240 (−39)K% 20.6% → 28.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.60% | ÷0.981 | ×1.360 | — | — | 28.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.56% | ÷0.973 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 6.17% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.69% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.55% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.84% | ÷0.988 | ×0.920 | ×1.046 | ×1.015 | 25.55% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.03% | ÷0.955 | ×0.830 | ×1.046 | ×1.015 | 3.72% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.67% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.046 | ×1.015 | 0.56% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.01% | ÷1.015 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.81% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 98, 2B 91, 3B 130, K 96, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.046.
Result: wOBA .279 → .240; ISO .065 → .052; BABIP .305 → .298. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Lake County Captains · 40 PAwOBA .248 → .219 (−29)K% 25.0% → 31.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.00% | ÷1.015 | ×1.270 | — | — | 31.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.00% | ÷0.975 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.027 | 3.74% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.63% | ÷0.983 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.027 | 28.48% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.70% | ÷1.005 | ×0.810 | — | ×1.027 | 3.07% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.970 | ×0.850 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.134 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 127, 1B 97, 2B 101, 3B 94, K 103, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .248 → .219; ISO .027 → .022; BABIP .321 → .304. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ALynchburg Hillcats · 349 PAwOBA .240 → .199 (−41)K% 26.4% → 35.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.36% | ÷1.008 | ×1.360 | — | — | 35.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.88% | ÷1.024 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 4.77% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.86% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.69% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.64% | ÷1.014 | ×0.920 | ×1.011 | ×1.030 | 22.33% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.45% | ÷0.988 | ×0.830 | ×1.011 | ×1.030 | 4.77% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.91% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.011 | ×1.030 | 0.75% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.950 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 103, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 102, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.011.
Result: wOBA .240 → .199; ISO .051 → .041; BABIP .293 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKAZL Indians Red · 181 PAwOBA .226 → .150 (−76)K% 29.3% → 42.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.28% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 42.17% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.84% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.022 | 5.60% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.022 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.10% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×1.022 | 16.81% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.75% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.022 | 1.92% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.92% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.022 | 0.64% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.022 | 1.46% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .226 → .150; ISO .068 → .044; BABIP .250 → .195. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).