Deyvi Almonte

P DSL Arizona Black

Age 19 LHP ROK

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2026	18	ROKDSL Arizona B…	13	13	12.08	7.84	14.7%	30.7%	—	K 10.0% · BB 38.3% · FIP 8.14
2027PROJ	19	MLBARI	8	8	5.93	5.93	20.3%	20.0%	-0.1
2028PROJ49% MLB	20	MLBARI	10	10	5.57	5.44	21.1%	16.8%	-0.1

Next 2 projected WAR -0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 0 / P90 0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 100%

CompsCD Pelham (age 20) · Yensy Bello (age 19) · Edison Suriel (age 19)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 130138vR 146

ERA5.93

FIP5.93

K%20.3%

BB%20.0%

K-BB%0.3%

Proj IP8

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 8 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5050

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2026	18	ROK MLE	DSL Arizona Black	13	0	13	75	11	23	1	0%	1.0	10.0%	38.3%	-28.4%	1.9%	12.08	8.14	—
2026	18	ROK MLE	DSL Arizona Black	13	0	13	75	11	23	1	0%	1.0	10.0%	38.3%	-28.4%	1.9%	12.08	8.14	—
2026	18	ROK RAW	DSL Arizona Black	13	0	13	75	11	23	1	0%	1.0	14.7%	30.7%	-16.0%	1.3%	12.08	7.84	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	19	MLB	ARI	8	0	8	34	7	7	1	0%	1.0	20.3%	20.0%	0.3%	3.0%	5.93	5.93	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	20	MLB MLE	ARI	19	0	20	84	18	14	2	0%	1.1	21.1%	16.8%	4.2%	2.9%	5.57	5.44	-0.2
2028	20	MLB CTX	ARI	10	0	10	42	9	7	1	0%	1.0	21.1%	16.8%	4.2%	2.9%	5.57	5.44	-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		9	0	10	42	9	7	1	0%	1.1	21.1%	16.8%	4.2%	2.9%	5.57	5.06	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	183	142	20	0%	1.1	21.1%	16.8%	4.2%	2.9%	5.57	5.06	-1.2
Career	—	MLE		13	0	13	75	7	29	1	0%	1.0	10.0%	38.3%	-28.4%	1.9%	12.08	8.14	-0.2
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		205	0	200	1184	118	454	22	0%	1.0	10.0%	38.3%	-28.4%	1.9%	12.08	8.14	-2.1

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Deyvi Almonte (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.93	20.3%	20.0%	3.0%	—	5.44	21.1%	4.2%	20	-0.49	—	—	—
CD Pelham L 2015 · 4.77 FIP	20	SU	4.77	18.8%	18.7%	1.6%	.286	4.00	20.4%	7.8%	109	-0.77	3.39	288	88
Yensy Bello L 2022 · 6.82 FIP	19	SU	6.82	19.9%	32.3%	2.4%	.240	3.76	17.4%	4.1%	91	-3.06	2.65	103	88
Edison Suriel L 2018 · 6.39 FIP	19	SU	6.39	16.8%	20.5%	3.8%	.341	2.16	21.4%	14.6%	17	-4.23	2.16	159	77
Jayvien Sandridge L 2018 · 5.17 FIP	19	SU	5.17	15.5%	19.0%	1.8%	.188	6.78	19.0%	-4.9%	13	+1.61	3.25	223	76
Daniel Gonzalez L 2021 · 5.55 FIP	19	SU	5.55	13.6%	19.1%	2.1%	.318	4.98	20.1%	2.0%	100	-0.57	4.34	136	75
Develson Aria L 2019 · 5.19 FIP	18	SU	5.19	15.5%	19.7%	1.6%	.311	4.33	21.7%	3.1%	54	-0.86	4.32	137	74
Anfernny Reyes L 2023 · 4.98 FIP	19	SU	4.98	21.6%	13.6%	3.6%	.282	4.34	21.0%	1.8%	99	-0.64	2.89	175	72
Roberto Medina L 2024 · 5.29 FIP	19	SW	5.29	18.5%	19.6%	2.3%	.254	5.91	15.1%	-2.7%	45	+0.62	3.87	109	72
Alex Robinson L 2015 · 5.75 FIP	20	SU	5.75	16.2%	31.7%	0.0%	.312	4.45	23.4%	5.2%	123	-1.30	3.69	135	72
Zhiorman Imbriano L 2022 · 5.72 FIP	19	SU	5.72	12.3%	21.1%	1.8%	.283	4.79	13.2%	-5.0%	65	-0.93	3.82	100	71
Ignacio Briceno L 2021 · 5.16 FIP	20	SU	5.16	12.7%	12.9%	2.7%	.230	3.33	17.0%	7.2%	82	-1.83	2.39	156	70
Max Green L 2018 · 4.87 FIP	22	SU	4.87	15.7%	13.3%	2.6%	.352	4.41	13.9%	6.6%	86	-0.46	4.19	169	70
Izaak Martinez L 2024 · 6.26 FIP	22	SU	6.26	21.5%	15.0%	5.6%	.300	4.03	20.0%	10.6%	125	-2.23	3.77	138	69
Carlos Sarmiento L 2023 · 6.86 FIP	19	SU	6.86	15.4%	25.3%	3.4%	.450	—	—	—	—	—	4.76	100	69
Gabriel Cotto L 2019 · 5.98 FIP	19	SW	5.98	11.3%	18.4%	2.8%	.309	5.15	18.5%	2.4%	113	-0.83	5.02	236	69
Denny Bentley L 2018 · 4.85 FIP	20	SU	4.85	19.6%	10.3%	3.8%	.318	2.88	25.4%	10.3%	58	-1.97	2.88	175	69
Gabriel Rodriguez L 2018 · 6.80 FIP	19	SU	6.80	24.9%	45.8%	0.0%	.188	6.53	26.8%	-6.5%	32	-0.27	6.05	128	69
Felix Viloria L 2016 · 5.01 FIP	19	SU	5.01	18.2%	13.1%	3.3%	.212	4.49	12.9%	5.6%	45	-0.52	2.69	128	68
Gregori Louis L 2022 · 5.03 FIP	19	SU	5.03	25.4%	13.1%	4.4%	.364	4.96	19.1%	2.9%	89	-0.07	3.58	149	68
Enrique Perez L 2017 · 5.13 FIP	19	SU	5.13	16.0%	26.7%	0.0%	.333	4.81	16.2%	1.9%	27	-0.32	3.76	133	68