Tom Poole

OF Charleston RiverDogs
Age 24 L/R 6'2" / 211 lbs A HR -6%H +4% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2037
Overview
APROSPECTMiLBFA 2038
MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202522ATB86.200/.333/.3573037—.151/.262/.260
202623A+/ATB406.237/.361/.42414660—.177/.269/.305
2027PROJMLE24MLBTB380.184/.267/.31210664-0.4
2028PROJ30% MLB25MLBTB71.188/.271/.3162167-0.2
Next 2 projected WAR -0.6Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2037Service0.0First FA2038
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029Ext$0.0M2030Ext$0.0M2031Ext$0.0M2032Ext$0.9M2033Ext$0.9M2034Ext$1.0M+3
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2026 A+
ISO87
wRC+54
BB%53
wOBA51
Chase%48
Speed23
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 99%
CompsChris Epps (age 24) · Dillon Paulson (age 24) · Nick Yarnall (age 24)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONpark-neutral Marcel · 206 proj PA
wRC+†64
AVG/OBP/SLG.182 / .265 / .309
PA206
HR5
K%35
BB%9
ISO128
MLB%0%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -8.7 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-9BATRUN: +0.2 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)+0RUNFLD: +0.0 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)+0FLDPOS: -1.2 runs (Positional adjustment)-1POSREP: +4.5 runs (Replacement-level credit)+4REPTotal WAR: -0.40-0.4WAR
trajectory · projected WAR by year
-0.4-0.22728
Tools · ContractCON 20 / POW 45
Toolsscout grade
CONTACT20
scouting grade only
POWER45
scouting grade only
EYE54
scouting grade only
SPEED45
scouting grade only
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2032
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2037
First FA Year   2038
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2029Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2030Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2031Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2032Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2033Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2034Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2035Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2036Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2037Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $0.0M $0.0M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202522 ACharleston RiverDogs — 8670 14203 10324 01 200333357690 157297 3712 312 37 — — — — — —
202623 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods — 118102 23407 14441 10 225325471795 245314 3712 348 53 — — — — — —
202623 ACharleston RiverDogs — 288235 571517 45835 53 243375404780 162338 2916 352 63 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202522 A MLECharleston RiverDogs — 8673 11202 7434 01 151262260522 110262 508 223 37 — — — — — —
202623 A+ MLEBowling Green Hot Rods — 118108 18305 8581 10 167231333564 167271 497 246 53 — — — — — —
202623 A MLECharleston RiverDogs — 288249 451115 311135 53 181284293577 112293 3911 261 63 — — — — — —
202522 A MLECharleston RiverDogs — 8673 11202 7434 01 151262260522 110300 508 223 37 — — — — — —
202522 A RAWCharleston RiverDogs — 8670 14203 10324 01 200333357690 157297 3712 312 37 — — — — — —
202623 A MLE2 teams — 406357 6314110 391706 63 176269305574 129294 4210 257 60 — — — — — —
202623 A RAW2 teams — 406337 8019114 591276 63 237361424785 187332 3115 351 60 — — — — — —
202522 A MLECharleston RiverDogs — 8675 11202 7434 01 147262253515 107262 508 223 37 — — — — — —
202623 A MLE2 teams — 406358 6314110 391706 63 176269304573 128287 4210 257 60 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202522 A MLECharleston RiverDogs — 8675 11202 7434 01 147262253515 107262 508 223 37 — — — — — —
202623 A MLE2 teams — 406358 6314110 391706 63 176269304573 128287 4210 257 60 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202724 MLB MLETB 0% 380338 6212110 341345 62 184267312579 128266 359 263 64 -16 +0 +0 -2 +8 -0.4
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202825 MLB MLETB 30% 237211 40816 21823 41 187270318588 131267 359 267 67 -9 +0 +0 -1 +5 -0.5
202825 MLB CTXTB 30% 7164 12202 6251 10 188271316588 128270 358 267 67 -3 +0 +0 -0 +2 -0.2
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 7164 12202 6251 10 188268312580 125270 358 267 61 -3 +0 +0 -0 +2 -0.2
/ 162G— A+C — 650586 10918018 552299 90 186266309575 123268 358 267 61 -26 +2 +0 -4 +14 -1.4
Career— MLE — 935825 14730323 8536815 136 178267305572 127281 399 258 61 -18 +1 +0 -3 +10 -1.1
/ 162G— MLE — 650574 10221216 5925610 94 178266305571 127280 399 258 61 -27 +1 +0 -4 +14 -1.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 ACharleston RiverDogs · 288 PAwOBA .347 → .261 (−86)K% 28.8% → 39.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA28.82%÷1.000×1.360——39.19%
BB% (unintentional) /PA15.62%÷1.000×0.690—×0.98010.57%
HBP% /PA1.74%—×0.780—×0.9801.33%
Singles /BIP22.37%÷1.000×0.920×1.001×0.98020.20%
Doubles /BIP9.87%÷1.000×0.830×1.001×0.9808.04%
Triples /BIP0.66%÷1.000×0.910×1.001×0.9800.59%
Home runs /BIP4.61%÷1.000×0.800—×0.9803.61%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.001.

Result: wOBA .347 → .261; ISO .162 → .120; BABIP .338 → .293. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 118 PAwOBA .339 → .246 (−92)K% 37.3% → 48.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA37.29%÷1.000×1.310——48.85%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.86%÷1.000×0.600—×0.9887.03%
HBP% /PA0.85%—×0.770—×0.9880.64%
Singles /BIP20.69%÷1.000×0.870×1.050×0.98818.67%
Doubles /BIP6.90%÷1.000×0.780×1.050×0.9885.58%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.850×1.050×0.9880.00%
Home runs /BIP12.07%÷1.000×0.880—×0.98810.49%

Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .339 → .246; ISO .245 → .186; BABIP .314 → .271. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 ACharleston RiverDogs · 86 PAwOBA .312 → .223 (−89)K% 37.2% → 50.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA37.21%÷1.006×1.360——50.33%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.63%÷0.985×0.690—×0.9908.07%
HBP% /PA4.65%—×0.780—×0.9903.59%
Singles /BIP23.68%÷1.013×0.920—×0.99021.30%
Doubles /BIP5.26%÷0.850×0.830—×0.9905.09%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.121×0.910—×0.9900.00%
Home runs /BIP7.89%÷1.159×0.800—×0.9905.40%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 132, 1B 103, 2B 70, 3B 124, K 101, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .312 → .223; ISO .157 → .099; BABIP .297 → .262. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).