Tom Poole
OF Charleston RiverDogs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22 | ATB | 86 | .200/.333/.357 | 3 | 0 | 37 | — | .151/.262/.260 |
| 2026 | 23 | A+/ATB | 406 | .237/.361/.424 | 14 | 6 | 60 | — | .177/.269/.305 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 24 | MLBTB | 380 | .184/.267/.312 | 10 | 6 | 64 | -0.4 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 25 | MLBTB | 71 | .188/.271/.316 | 2 | 1 | 67 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 20 / POW 45
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 86 | 70 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 200 | 333 | 357 | 690 | 157 | 297 | 37 | 12 | 312 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 118 | 102 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 44 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 225 | 325 | 471 | 795 | 245 | 314 | 37 | 12 | 348 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 288 | 235 | 57 | 15 | 1 | 7 | 45 | 83 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 243 | 375 | 404 | 780 | 162 | 338 | 29 | 16 | 352 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 86 | 73 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 43 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 151 | 262 | 260 | 522 | 110 | 262 | 50 | 8 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 118 | 108 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 58 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 167 | 231 | 333 | 564 | 167 | 271 | 49 | 7 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 288 | 249 | 45 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 31 | 113 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 181 | 284 | 293 | 577 | 112 | 293 | 39 | 11 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 86 | 73 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 43 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 151 | 262 | 260 | 522 | 110 | 300 | 50 | 8 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 86 | 70 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 200 | 333 | 357 | 690 | 157 | 297 | 37 | 12 | 312 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 406 | 357 | 63 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 39 | 170 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 176 | 269 | 305 | 574 | 129 | 294 | 42 | 10 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 406 | 337 | 80 | 19 | 1 | 14 | 59 | 127 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 237 | 361 | 424 | 785 | 187 | 332 | 31 | 15 | 351 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 86 | 75 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 43 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 147 | 262 | 253 | 515 | 107 | 262 | 50 | 8 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 406 | 358 | 63 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 39 | 170 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 176 | 269 | 304 | 573 | 128 | 287 | 42 | 10 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 86 | 75 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 43 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 147 | 262 | 253 | 515 | 107 | 262 | 50 | 8 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 406 | 358 | 63 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 39 | 170 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 176 | 269 | 304 | 573 | 128 | 287 | 42 | 10 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB MLE | TB | 0% | 380 | 338 | 62 | 12 | 1 | 10 | 34 | 134 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 184 | 267 | 312 | 579 | 128 | 266 | 35 | 9 | 263 | 64 | -16 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +8 | -0.4 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | TB | 30% | 237 | 211 | 40 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 82 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 187 | 270 | 318 | 588 | 131 | 267 | 35 | 9 | 267 | 67 | -9 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +5 | -0.5 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | TB | 30% | 71 | 64 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 25 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 188 | 271 | 316 | 588 | 128 | 270 | 35 | 8 | 267 | 67 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +2 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 71 | 64 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 25 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 188 | 268 | 312 | 580 | 125 | 270 | 35 | 8 | 267 | 61 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +2 | -0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 586 | 109 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 55 | 229 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 186 | 266 | 309 | 575 | 123 | 268 | 35 | 8 | 267 | 61 | -26 | +2 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -1.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 935 | 825 | 147 | 30 | 3 | 23 | 85 | 368 | 15 | 13 | 6 | 178 | 267 | 305 | 572 | 127 | 281 | 39 | 9 | 258 | 61 | -18 | +1 | +0 | -3 | +10 | -1.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 574 | 102 | 21 | 2 | 16 | 59 | 256 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 178 | 266 | 305 | 571 | 127 | 280 | 39 | 9 | 258 | 61 | -27 | +1 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -1.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ACharleston RiverDogs · 288 PAwOBA .347 → .261 (−86)K% 28.8% → 39.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.82% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 39.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.62% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 10.57% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.74% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 1.33% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.37% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.001 | ×0.980 | 20.20% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.87% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.001 | ×0.980 | 8.04% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.66% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×1.001 | ×0.980 | 0.59% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.61% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 3.61% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.001.
Result: wOBA .347 → .261; ISO .162 → .120; BABIP .338 → .293. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 118 PAwOBA .339 → .246 (−92)K% 37.3% → 48.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 37.29% | ÷1.000 | ×1.310 | — | — | 48.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.86% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | — | ×0.988 | 7.03% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.85% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.988 | 0.64% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.870 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 18.67% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.90% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 5.58% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 12.07% | ÷1.000 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.988 | 10.49% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .339 → .246; ISO .245 → .186; BABIP .314 → .271. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ACharleston RiverDogs · 86 PAwOBA .312 → .223 (−89)K% 37.2% → 50.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 37.21% | ÷1.006 | ×1.360 | — | — | 50.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.63% | ÷0.985 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 8.07% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.65% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 3.59% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.68% | ÷1.013 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.990 | 21.30% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.26% | ÷0.850 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.990 | 5.09% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.121 | ×0.910 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 7.89% | ÷1.159 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 5.40% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 132, 1B 103, 2B 70, 3B 124, K 101, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .312 → .223; ISO .157 → .099; BABIP .297 → .262. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).