Ethan O'Donnell
CF Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | A+CIN | 415 | .269/.359/.416 | 10 | 31 | 70 | — | .220/.296/.320 |
| 2025 | 23 | AACIN | 503 | .236/.332/.325 | 7 | 20 | 63 | — | .230/.295/.306 |
| 2026 | 24 | AAA/AAMIA | 415 | .229/.351/.342 | 9 | 31 | 68 | — | .205/.300/.293 |
| 2027PROJ10% MLB | 25 | MLBMIA | 21 | .200/.280/.282 | 0 | 1 | 66 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ28% MLB | 26 | MLBMIA | 70 | .203/.282/.292 | 1 | 3 | 70 | 0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ36% MLB | 27 | MLBMIA | 101 | .204/.283/.295 | 2 | 4 | 71 | -0.0 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 21 | A | Daytona Tortugas | — | 94 | 80 | 28 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 350 | 447 | 600 | 1.047 | 250 | 414 | 19 | 11 | 456 | 119 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | ROK | ACL Reds | — | 17 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 200 | 294 | 200 | 494 | 300 | 29 | 12 | 242 | -7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ | Dayton Dragons | — | 415 | 361 | 97 | 11 | 6 | 10 | 40 | 108 | 11 | 31 | 5 | 269 | 359 | 416 | 775 | 147 | 357 | 26 | 10 | 347 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 503 | 424 | 100 | 13 | 2 | 7 | 54 | 129 | 7 | 20 | 3 | 236 | 332 | 325 | 657 | 90 | 314 | 26 | 11 | 294 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AAA | Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp | — | 238 | 195 | 44 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 36 | 65 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 226 | 357 | 303 | 660 | 77 | 318 | 27 | 15 | 310 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA | Pensacola Blue Wahoos | — | 177 | 150 | 35 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 21 | 42 | 4 | 15 | 2 | 233 | 343 | 393 | 736 | 160 | 282 | 24 | 12 | 331 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Daytona Tortugas | — | 94 | 83 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 277 | 362 | 470 | 832 | 193 | 345 | 26 | 7 | 344 | 119 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Reds | — | 17 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 125 | 176 | 125 | 301 | 241 | 41 | 6 | 158 | -7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Dayton Dragons | — | 415 | 372 | 82 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 29 | 137 | 11 | 31 | 5 | 220 | 296 | 320 | 616 | 99 | 323 | 33 | 7 | 271 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 503 | 444 | 102 | 12 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 156 | 7 | 20 | 3 | 230 | 295 | 306 | 601 | 77 | 310 | 31 | 7 | 262 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AAA MLE | Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp | — | 238 | 205 | 41 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 78 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 200 | 302 | 254 | 556 | 54 | 302 | 33 | 11 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA MLE | Pensacola Blue Wahoos | — | 177 | 156 | 33 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 51 | 4 | 15 | 2 | 212 | 297 | 346 | 643 | 135 | 267 | 29 | 8 | 277 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 111 | 99 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 31 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 253 | 333 | 414 | 747 | 162 | 338 | 28 | 7 | 316 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 111 | 95 | 31 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 326 | 423 | 537 | 960 | 211 | 397 | 21 | 11 | 423 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Dayton Dragons | — | 415 | 372 | 82 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 29 | 137 | 11 | 31 | 5 | 220 | 296 | 320 | 616 | 99 | 330 | 33 | 7 | 271 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ RAW | Dayton Dragons | — | 415 | 361 | 97 | 11 | 6 | 10 | 40 | 108 | 11 | 31 | 5 | 269 | 359 | 416 | 775 | 147 | 357 | 26 | 10 | 347 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 503 | 444 | 102 | 12 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 156 | 7 | 20 | 3 | 230 | 295 | 306 | 601 | 77 | 331 | 31 | 7 | 262 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA RAW | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 503 | 424 | 100 | 13 | 2 | 7 | 54 | 129 | 7 | 20 | 3 | 236 | 332 | 325 | 657 | 90 | 314 | 26 | 11 | 294 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 415 | 362 | 74 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 40 | 129 | 8 | 31 | 4 | 204 | 298 | 293 | 590 | 88 | 293 | 31 | 10 | 268 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AAA RAW | 2 teams | — | 415 | 345 | 79 | 12 | 0 | 9 | 57 | 107 | 8 | 31 | 4 | 229 | 351 | 342 | 693 | 113 | 302 | 26 | 14 | 319 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 111 | 98 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 31 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 255 | 333 | 418 | 752 | 163 | 329 | 28 | 7 | 316 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Dayton Dragons | — | 415 | 372 | 82 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 29 | 137 | 11 | 31 | 5 | 220 | 296 | 320 | 616 | 99 | 323 | 33 | 7 | 271 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 503 | 457 | 102 | 12 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 156 | 7 | 20 | 3 | 223 | 295 | 298 | 592 | 74 | 310 | 31 | 7 | 262 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 415 | 364 | 74 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 40 | 129 | 8 | 31 | 4 | 203 | 298 | 291 | 589 | 88 | 287 | 31 | 10 | 268 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Dayton Dragons | — | 415 | 372 | 82 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 29 | 137 | 11 | 31 | 5 | 220 | 296 | 320 | 616 | 99 | 323 | 33 | 7 | 271 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 503 | 457 | 102 | 12 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 156 | 7 | 20 | 3 | 223 | 295 | 298 | 592 | 74 | 310 | 31 | 7 | 262 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 415 | 364 | 74 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 40 | 129 | 8 | 31 | 4 | 203 | 298 | 291 | 589 | 88 | 287 | 31 | 10 | 268 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB MLE | MIA | 10% | 380 | 339 | 70 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 32 | 118 | 6 | 16 | 2 | 206 | 285 | 293 | 578 | 87 | 293 | 31 | 8 | 266 | 66 | -15 | +2 | +1 | +1 | +8 | 0.0 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB CTX | MIA | 10% | 21 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 200 | 280 | 282 | 562 | 82 | 285 | 29 | 10 | 259 | 66 | -1 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | MIA | 28% | 253 | 226 | 47 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 77 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 209 | 288 | 304 | 592 | 95 | 293 | 30 | 8 | 271 | 70 | -9 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +5 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | MIA | 36% | 281 | 251 | 53 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 24 | 85 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 210 | 289 | 307 | 596 | 97 | 293 | 30 | 9 | 273 | 71 | -10 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +6 | -0.0 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | MIA | 41% | 296 | 265 | 56 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 25 | 89 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 210 | 288 | 308 | 596 | 97 | 292 | 30 | 8 | 273 | 71 | -10 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +6 | -0.1 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIA | 43% | 296 | 265 | 56 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 25 | 89 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 210 | 287 | 307 | 594 | 97 | 291 | 30 | 8 | 272 | 70 | -11 | +1 | -0 | +1 | +6 | -0.2 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB MLE | MIA | 44% | 294 | 264 | 56 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 24 | 88 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 209 | 285 | 305 | 590 | 96 | 289 | 30 | 8 | 270 | 69 | -11 | +1 | -1 | +1 | +6 | -0.4 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | MIA | 28% | 70 | 63 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 203 | 282 | 292 | 575 | 89 | 285 | 30 | 9 | 264 | 70 | -3 | +1 | +0 | +0 | +2 | 0.0 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | MIA | 36% | 101 | 91 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 31 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 204 | 283 | 295 | 578 | 91 | 284 | 31 | 8 | 265 | 71 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +2 | -0.0 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | MIA | 41% | 121 | 108 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 36 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 204 | 283 | 295 | 578 | 91 | 283 | 30 | 8 | 265 | 71 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +3 | -0.1 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIA | 43% | 127 | 113 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 38 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 204 | 282 | 294 | 576 | 91 | 282 | 30 | 9 | 265 | 70 | -5 | +0 | -0 | +0 | +3 | -0.1 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB CTX | MIA | 44% | 129 | 115 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 39 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 203 | 280 | 292 | 572 | 90 | 281 | 30 | 9 | 263 | 69 | -5 | +0 | -1 | +0 | +3 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 548 | 490 | 99 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 46 | 165 | 8 | 18 | 4 | 202 | 281 | 286 | 567 | 84 | 281 | 30 | 8 | 264 | 69 | -20 | +2 | -0 | +2 | +12 | -0.4 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 581 | 118 | 17 | 0 | 11 | 55 | 196 | 9 | 21 | 5 | 203 | 282 | 289 | 571 | 86 | 282 | 30 | 8 | 264 | 69 | -23 | +2 | -0 | +2 | +14 | -0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3074 | 2736 | 590 | 83 | 15 | 49 | 247 | 946 | 53 | 143 | 21 | 216 | 293 | 311 | 604 | 95 | 308 | 31 | 8 | 271 | 69 | -59 | +8 | +1 | +6 | +35 | -0.9 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 579 | 125 | 18 | 3 | 10 | 52 | 200 | 11 | 30 | 4 | 216 | 293 | 309 | 602 | 93 | 308 | 31 | 8 | 271 | 69 | -24 | +3 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -0.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 238 PAwOBA .305 → .261 (−44)K% 27.3% → 32.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.31% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | — | — | 32.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.13% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.048 | 10.94% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.68% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.048 | 1.66% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.92% | ÷1.000 | ×0.930 | ×0.997 | ×1.048 | 26.15% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.62% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.997 | ×1.048 | 4.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | ×0.997 | ×1.048 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.31% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.048 | 1.69% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.
Result: wOBA .305 → .261; ISO .077 → .061; BABIP .318 → .302. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAPensacola Blue Wahoos · 177 PAwOBA .324 → .277 (−48)K% 23.7% → 28.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.73% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 28.95% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.86% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.012 | 8.16% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.26% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×1.012 | 1.92% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.30% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.034 | ×1.012 | 20.50% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.56% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×1.034 | ×1.012 | 5.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.880 | ×1.034 | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.56% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 4.50% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.034.
Result: wOBA .324 → .277; ISO .160 → .135; BABIP .282 → .267. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 503 PAwOBA .291 → .262 (−28)K% 25.6% → 31.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.65% | ÷1.010 | ×1.220 | — | — | 30.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.54% | ÷1.087 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.027 | 6.77% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.39% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×1.027 | 1.20% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.44% | ÷0.963 | ×0.920 | ×1.030 | ×1.027 | 26.70% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.41% | ÷1.092 | ×0.910 | ×1.030 | ×1.027 | 3.88% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.68% | ÷1.001 | ×0.880 | ×1.030 | ×1.027 | 0.63% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.37% | ÷1.021 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 1.91% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 93, 2B 118, 3B 100, K 102, BB 117 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.
Result: wOBA .291 → .262; ISO .090 → .079; BABIP .314 → .310. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Dayton Dragons · 415 PAwOBA .338 → .271 (−67)K% 26.0% → 32.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.02% | ÷1.006 | ×1.270 | — | — | 32.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.40% | ÷0.976 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 6.92% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.65% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 2.12% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.67% | ÷1.023 | ×0.920 | ×1.022 | ×1.012 | 25.73% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.35% | ÷0.941 | ×0.810 | ×1.022 | ×1.012 | 3.87% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.37% | ÷1.030 | ×0.850 | ×1.022 | ×1.012 | 2.02% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.95% | ÷1.285 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 2.49% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 157, 1B 105, 2B 88, 3B 106, K 101, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.
Result: wOBA .338 → .271; ISO .147 → .103; BABIP .357 → .323. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ADaytona Tortugas · 94 PAwOBA .444 → .344 (−101)K% 19.1% → 25.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.15% | ÷1.006 | ×1.360 | — | — | 25.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.64% | ÷1.006 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 7.41% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.26% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 3.37% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.03% | ÷1.032 | ×0.920 | ×0.967 | ×1.015 | 25.39% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.45% | ÷1.100 | ×0.830 | ×0.967 | ×1.015 | 4.78% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.23% | ÷1.083 | ×0.910 | ×0.967 | ×1.015 | 2.66% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.45% | ÷1.060 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 4.94% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 106, 2B 120, 3B 117, K 101, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.967.
Result: wOBA .444 → .344; ISO .250 → .185; BABIP .414 → .345. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKACL Reds · 17 PAwOBA .236 → .158 (−79)K% 29.4% → 41.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.41% | ÷1.027 | ×1.440 | — | — | 41.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.76% | ÷1.040 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 6.91% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.00% | ÷1.004 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.985 | 24.13% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.038 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.059 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 101, 2B 108, 3B 130, K 105, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .236 → .158; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .300 → .241. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).