Mike Antico

OF Hartford Yard Goats
Age 29 L/R 5'9" / 205 lbs AA HR +30%H +12% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2035
Overview
AAPROSPECTMiLBFA 2036
MLB%2%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202426AAA/AA/INTL2 orgs523.262/.328/.416163358—.217/.270/.326
202527AAA/INTL2 orgs411.275/.366/.40872479—.234/.307/.346
202628AAA/AACOL239.162/.298/.27451932—.138/.252/.226
2027PROJMLE29MLBCOL3.207/.284/.3200064-0.0
2028PROJ23% MLB30MLBCOL39.207/.282/.3171263-0.1
Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2035Service0.0First FA2036
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029Ext$0.0M2030Ext$0.8M2031Ext$0.9M2032Ext$0.9M2033Ext$3M2034Ext$5M+1
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2026 AAA
Z-Con%56
BB%44
K%43
Whiff%33
Chase%29
Speed17
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 100%
CompsRay-Patrick Didder (age 29) · Pedro Florimón (age 29) · Mark Contreras (age 29)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONstats below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+†64
AVG/OBP/SLG.207 / .284 / .320
PA3
HR0
K%33
BB%7
BABIP294
ISO94
MLB%2%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -6.6 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-7BATRUN: +1.1 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)+1RUNFLD: +0.0 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)+0FLDPOS: -0.9 runs (Positional adjustment)-1POSREP: +3.3 runs (Replacement-level credit)+3REPTotal WAR: -0.20-0.2WAR
trajectory · projected WAR by year
-0.2-0.12728
Tools · ContractCON 50 / POW 45
Toolsscout grade
CONTACT50
scouting grade only
POWER45
scouting grade only
EYE50
scouting grade only
SPEED60
scouting grade only
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2030
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2035
First FA Year   2036
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2030
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2030
2029Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2030Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2031Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2032Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2033Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2034Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2035Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $0.0M $0.0M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202123 APalm Beach Cardinals — 159143 38836 13333 81 266340490829 224308 218 364 70 — — — — — —
202224 AASpringfield Cardinals — 275240 561208 30674 304 233328383712 150289 2411 322 56 — — — — — —
202224 A+Peoria Chiefs — 321274 701926 41764 373 255361405766 150330 2413 344 64 — — — — — —
202224 INTLSalt River Rafters — 4940 8103 7172 82 200347450797 250250 3514 357 128 — — — — — —
202325 AASpringfield Cardinals — 545476 12623518 5412610 528 265352447799 183322 2310 353 72 — — — — — —
202426 AAAMemphis Redbirds — 224203 531027 17492 152 261324433758 172311 228 334 63 — — — — — —
202426 AASpringfield Cardinals — 276244 66529 22544 183 270339418758 148310 208 333 57 — — — — — —
202426 INTLToros del Este — 2322 4100 170 01 182217227445 45267 304 204 24 — — — — — —
202527 AAAMemphis Redbirds — 381326 912127 42946 214 279372420792 141364 2511 351 80 — — — — — —
202527 INTLNavegantes del Magallanes — 3027 6100 281 31 222300259559 37316 277 265 65 — — — — — —
202628 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes — 7457 10201 7186 60 175329263592 88220 249 274 54 — — — — — —
202628 AAHartford Yard Goats — 165140 22504 146211 131 157285279563 121243 388 269 22 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202123 A MLEPalm Beach Cardinals — 159148 30625 8433 81 203258372629 169250 275 271 70 — — — — — —
202224 AA MLESpringfield Cardinals — 275250 471006 20804 304 188259300559 112249 297 251 56 — — — — — —
202224 A+ MLEPeoria Chiefs — 321286 581524 29914 373 203285311596 108271 289 263 64 — — — — — —
202325 AA MLESpringfield Cardinals — 545492 10417513 3815610 528 211281346627 134274 297 274 72 — — — — — —
202426 AAA MLEMemphis Redbirds — 224208 45825 12622 152 216266346612 130277 285 262 63 — — — — — —
202426 AA MLESpringfield Cardinals — 276252 55425 15704 183 218273310583 91266 255 253 57 — — — — — —
202527 AAA MLEMemphis Redbirds — 381338 791626 301186 214 234307346654 112322 318 287 80 — — — — — —
202628 AAA MLEAlbuquerque Isotopes — 7459 10201 5226 60 169300254554 85207 307 248 54 — — — — — —
202628 AA MLEHartford Yard Goats — 165145 18403 97611 131 124230214444 90217 465 200 22 — — — — — —
202123 A MLEPalm Beach Cardinals — 159148 30625 8433 81 203258372629 169250 275 271 70 — — — — — —
202123 A RAWPalm Beach Cardinals — 159143 38836 13333 81 266340490829 224308 218 364 70 — — — — — —
202224 A+ MLE3 teams — 645579 11327211 5318510 759 195274306580 111264 298 257 60 — — — — — —
202224 A+ RAW3 teams — 645554 13432217 7816010 759 242346399745 157308 2512 336 60 — — — — — —
202325 AA MLESpringfield Cardinals — 545492 10417513 3815610 528 211281346627 134279 297 274 72 — — — — — —
202325 AA RAWSpringfield Cardinals — 545476 12623518 5412610 528 265352447799 183322 2310 353 72 — — — — — —
202426 AA MLE3 teams — 523481 10313310 291376 336 214267316583 102275 266 257 60 — — — — — —
202426 AA RAW3 teams — 523469 12316416 401106 336 262328416743 154308 218 328 60 — — — — — —
202527 AAA MLE2 teams — 411364 841726 331287 245 231307338645 107331 318 287 80 — — — — — —
202527 AAA RAW2 teams — 411353 972227 441027 245 275366408774 133360 2511 345 80 — — — — — —
202628 AA MLE2 teams — 239204 27603 149717 191 132247206453 74224 416 215 32 — — — — — —
202628 AA RAW2 teams — 239197 32705 218017 191 162298274572 112235 339 270 32 — — — — — —
202123 A MLEPalm Beach Cardinals — 159147 30625 8433 81 204258374632 170250 275 271 70 — — — — — —
202224 A+ MLE3 teams — 645577 11327211 5318510 759 196274307581 111261 298 257 60 — — — — — —
202325 AA MLESpringfield Cardinals — 545492 10417513 3815610 528 211281346627 134274 297 274 72 — — — — — —
202426 AA MLE3 teams — 523483 10313310 291376 336 213267315582 101271 266 257 60 — — — — — —
202527 AAA MLE2 teams — 411368 841726 331287 245 228307334641 106322 318 287 80 — — — — — —
202628 AA MLE2 teams — 239206 27603 149717 191 131247204451 73214 416 215 32 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202426 AA MLE3 teams — 523483 10313310 291376 336 213267315582 101271 266 257 60 — — — — — —
202527 AAA MLE2 teams — 411368 841726 331287 245 228307334641 106322 318 287 80 — — — — — —
202628 AA MLE2 teams — 239206 27603 149717 191 131247204451 73214 416 215 32 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202729 MLB MLECOL 2% 289260 521015 19928 142 197275298572 100281 327 262 64 -12 +2 +0 -2 +6 -0.2
▸ 2027 — real world (MLB)
202729 MLB CTXCOL 2% 33 0000 010 00 207284320604 112294 330 275 64 -0 +0 +0 -0 +0 -0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202830 MLB MLECOL 23% 170152 31613 11545 71 197273295569 99280 326 261 63 -8 +1 -2 -1 +4 -0.6
202830 MLB CTXCOL 23% 3935 7101 3121 20 207282317599 110292 318 273 63 -2 +0 -0 -0 +1 -0.1
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 3935 7101 3121 20 200282314596 114273 318 273 64 -2 +0 -0 -0 +1 -0.1
/ 162G— A+C — 650583 11717017 5020017 330 201283317600 117273 318 273 64 -29 +7 -8 -4 +14 -2.0
Career— MLE — 28452558 519971653 19684862 22532 203276315591 113278 307 262 64 -14 +2 -2 -2 +7 -0.9
/ 162G— MLE — 650584 11922412 4519414 517 204277317594 113279 307 262 64 -28 +4 -4 -4 +14 -1.9

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 AAHartford Yard Goats · 165 PAwOBA .262 → .200 (−63)K% 37.6% → 45.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA37.58%÷1.000×1.220——45.84%
BB% (unintentional) /PA8.48%÷1.000×0.700—×0.9685.75%
HBP% /PA6.67%—×0.850—×0.9685.49%
Singles /BIP16.67%÷1.000×0.970×0.994×0.96815.55%
Doubles /BIP6.41%÷1.000×0.860×0.994×0.9685.30%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.950×0.994×0.9680.00%
Home runs /BIP5.13%÷1.000×0.780—×0.9683.87%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.994.

Result: wOBA .262 → .200; ISO .121 → .086; BABIP .243 → .217. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 74 PAwOBA .279 → .248 (−31)K% 24.3% → 29.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA24.32%÷1.000×1.200——29.19%
BB% (unintentional) /PA9.46%÷1.000×0.690—×0.9926.47%
HBP% /PA8.11%—×0.940—×0.9927.56%
Singles /BIP17.95%÷1.000×0.930×1.050×0.99217.39%
Doubles /BIP5.13%÷1.000×0.830×1.050×0.9924.43%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.970×1.050×0.9920.00%
Home runs /BIP2.56%÷1.000×0.700—×0.9921.78%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .279 → .248; ISO .088 → .072; BABIP .220 → .207. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 381 PAwOBA .347 → .287 (−60)K% 24.7% → 31.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA24.67%÷0.953×1.200——31.07%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.02%÷0.954×0.690—×1.0038.00%
HBP% /PA1.57%—×0.940—×1.0031.48%
Singles /BIP26.29%÷0.982×0.930×0.972×1.00324.29%
Doubles /BIP9.05%÷1.033×0.830×0.972×1.0037.09%
Triples /BIP0.86%÷0.900×0.970×0.972×1.0030.91%
Home runs /BIP3.02%÷0.869×0.700—×1.0032.44%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 74, 1B 96, 2B 107, 3B 80, K 91, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.972.

Result: wOBA .347 → .287; ISO .141 → .113; BABIP .364 → .322. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AASpringfield Cardinals · 276 PAwOBA .328 → .253 (−74)K% 19.6% → 25.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA19.57%÷0.943×1.220——25.32%
BB% (unintentional) /PA7.97%÷0.992×0.700—×0.9885.56%
HBP% /PA1.45%—×0.870—×0.9881.25%
Singles /BIP26.32%÷0.998×0.920×0.969×0.98823.23%
Doubles /BIP2.63%÷0.940×0.840×0.969×0.9882.25%
Triples /BIP1.05%÷1.150×0.940×0.969×0.9880.82%
Home runs /BIP4.74%÷1.386×0.800—×0.9882.70%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 177, 1B 100, 2B 88, 3B 130, K 89, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.969.

Result: wOBA .328 → .253; ISO .148 → .092; BABIP .310 → .266. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 224 PAwOBA .326 → .262 (−64)K% 21.9% → 27.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA21.88%÷0.953×1.200——27.55%
BB% (unintentional) /PA7.59%÷1.014×0.690—×1.0185.26%
HBP% /PA0.89%—×0.940—×1.0180.85%
Singles /BIP22.08%÷0.991×0.930×0.959×1.01820.22%
Doubles /BIP6.49%÷0.920×0.830×0.959×1.0185.72%
Triples /BIP1.30%÷1.150×0.970×0.959×1.0181.07%
Home runs /BIP4.55%÷1.020×0.700—×1.0183.17%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 98, 2B 84, 3B 130, K 91, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.959.

Result: wOBA .326 → .262; ISO .172 → .127; BABIP .311 → .277. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AASpringfield Cardinals · 545 PAwOBA .346 → .274 (−72)K% 23.1% → 28.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA23.12%÷0.987×1.220——28.59%
BB% (unintentional) /PA9.91%÷1.003×0.700—×0.9986.90%
HBP% /PA1.83%—×0.870—×0.9981.59%
Singles /BIP22.86%÷0.997×0.920×0.953×0.99820.06%
Doubles /BIP6.57%÷1.031×0.840×0.953×0.9985.09%
Triples /BIP1.43%÷0.900×0.940×0.953×0.9981.42%
Home runs /BIP5.14%÷1.080×0.800—×0.9983.80%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 116, 1B 99, 2B 106, 3B 80, K 97, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.953.

Result: wOBA .346 → .274; ISO .183 → .139; BABIP .322 → .274. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 A+Peoria Chiefs · 321 PAwOBA .338 → .263 (−75)K% 23.7% → 28.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA23.68%÷1.064×1.270——28.26%
BB% (unintentional) /PA12.77%÷0.992×0.710—×0.9889.03%
HBP% /PA1.25%—×0.790—×0.9880.97%
Singles /BIP21.72%÷1.012×0.920×0.950×0.98818.53%
Doubles /BIP9.60%÷0.989×0.810×0.950×0.9887.38%
Triples /BIP1.01%÷0.929×0.850×0.950×0.9880.87%
Home runs /BIP3.03%÷1.114×0.800—×0.9882.15%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 102, 2B 98, 3B 86, K 113, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .338 → .263; ISO .150 → .113; BABIP .330 → .271. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AASpringfield Cardinals · 275 PAwOBA .315 → .251 (−64)K% 24.4% → 29.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA24.36%÷1.024×1.220——29.03%
BB% (unintentional) /PA10.91%÷1.044×0.700—×1.0127.41%
HBP% /PA1.45%—×0.870—×1.0121.28%
Singles /BIP20.81%÷1.012×0.920×0.950×1.01218.18%
Doubles /BIP6.94%÷0.935×0.840×0.950×1.0125.99%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.900×0.940×0.950×1.0120.00%
Home runs /BIP4.62%÷1.069×0.800—×1.0123.50%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 114, 1B 102, 2B 87, 3B 80, K 105, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .315 → .251; ISO .150 → .118; BABIP .289 → .249. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .