Anibal Salas
OF Lakeland Flying Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18 | ROKDET | 160 | .195/.331/.323 | 4 | 3 | 26 | — | .141/.238/.232 |
| 2025 | 19 | ROKDET | 182 | .232/.356/.397 | 4 | 8 | 47 | — | .162/.256/.275 |
| 2026 | 20 | ADET | 359 | .247/.348/.406 | 8 | 5 | 66 | — | .206/.284/.330 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 21 | MLBDET | 469 | .188/.267/.300 | 8 | 6 | 61 | -0.5 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 22 | MLBDET | 105 | .190/.270/.307 | 2 | 1 | 67 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 30 / POW 35
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 17 | ROK | DSL Tigers 2 | — | 153 | 114 | 32 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 33 | 36 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 281 | 457 | 465 | 922 | 184 | 360 | 24 | 22 | 412 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 160 | 133 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 48 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 195 | 331 | 323 | 655 | 128 | 272 | 30 | 14 | 307 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 182 | 151 | 35 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 23 | 49 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 232 | 356 | 397 | 753 | 166 | 310 | 27 | 13 | 339 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 359 | 308 | 76 | 17 | 4 | 8 | 43 | 94 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 247 | 348 | 406 | 754 | 159 | 325 | 26 | 12 | 337 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers 2 | — | 153 | 124 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 45 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 169 | 318 | 250 | 568 | 81 | 226 | 29 | 15 | 269 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 160 | 142 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 70 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 141 | 237 | 232 | 470 | 92 | 230 | 44 | 9 | 206 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 182 | 160 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 70 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 163 | 256 | 275 | 531 | 113 | 250 | 38 | 8 | 238 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 359 | 321 | 66 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 30 | 128 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 206 | 284 | 330 | 614 | 125 | 302 | 36 | 8 | 266 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers 2 | — | 153 | 124 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 45 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 169 | 318 | 250 | 568 | 81 | 241 | 29 | 15 | 269 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Tigers 2 | — | 153 | 114 | 32 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 33 | 36 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 281 | 457 | 465 | 922 | 184 | 360 | 24 | 22 | 412 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 160 | 142 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 70 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 141 | 237 | 232 | 470 | 92 | 246 | 44 | 9 | 206 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers | — | 160 | 133 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 48 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 195 | 331 | 323 | 655 | 128 | 272 | 30 | 14 | 307 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 182 | 160 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 70 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 163 | 256 | 275 | 531 | 113 | 258 | 38 | 8 | 238 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers | — | 182 | 151 | 35 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 23 | 49 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 232 | 356 | 397 | 753 | 166 | 310 | 27 | 13 | 339 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 359 | 321 | 66 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 30 | 128 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 206 | 284 | 330 | 614 | 125 | 316 | 36 | 8 | 266 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 359 | 308 | 76 | 17 | 4 | 8 | 43 | 94 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 247 | 348 | 406 | 754 | 159 | 325 | 26 | 12 | 337 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers 2 | — | 153 | 125 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 45 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 168 | 318 | 248 | 566 | 80 | 226 | 29 | 15 | 269 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 160 | 141 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 70 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 142 | 237 | 234 | 472 | 92 | 230 | 44 | 9 | 206 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 182 | 160 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 70 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 163 | 256 | 275 | 531 | 113 | 250 | 38 | 8 | 238 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 359 | 321 | 66 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 30 | 128 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 206 | 284 | 330 | 614 | 125 | 302 | 36 | 8 | 266 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 160 | 141 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 70 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 142 | 237 | 234 | 472 | 92 | 230 | 44 | 9 | 206 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 182 | 160 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 70 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 163 | 256 | 275 | 531 | 113 | 250 | 38 | 8 | 238 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 359 | 321 | 66 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 30 | 128 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 206 | 284 | 330 | 614 | 125 | 302 | 36 | 8 | 266 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB MLE | DET | 0% | 469 | 420 | 79 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 39 | 151 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 188 | 267 | 300 | 567 | 113 | 267 | 32 | 8 | 259 | 61 | -22 | +0 | +0 | -3 | +10 | -0.5 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | DET | 34% | 306 | 273 | 52 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 26 | 96 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 194 | 273 | 314 | 587 | 121 | 269 | 31 | 8 | 267 | 67 | -12 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +7 | -0.7 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | DET | 34% | 105 | 94 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 190 | 270 | 307 | 577 | 117 | 265 | 31 | 9 | 263 | 67 | -4 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +2 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 105 | 94 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 191 | 269 | 309 | 578 | 117 | 267 | 31 | 9 | 263 | 58 | -4 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +2 | -0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 582 | 111 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 56 | 204 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 191 | 269 | 306 | 574 | 115 | 266 | 31 | 9 | 263 | 58 | -26 | +1 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -1.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1370 | 1208 | 221 | 40 | 12 | 24 | 124 | 477 | 26 | 31 | 10 | 183 | 273 | 296 | 569 | 113 | 275 | 35 | 9 | 255 | 58 | -22 | +1 | +0 | -3 | +11 | -1.3 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 573 | 105 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 59 | 226 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 183 | 273 | 295 | 568 | 112 | 276 | 35 | 9 | 255 | 58 | -28 | +1 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -1.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 359 PAwOBA .332 → .266 (−66)K% 26.2% → 35.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.18% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 35.61% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.98% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 8.39% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.39% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 1.10% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.96% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.028 | ×1.015 | 21.09% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.94% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.028 | ×1.015 | 6.88% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.87% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×1.028 | ×1.015 | 1.78% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.74% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 3.04% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.028.
Result: wOBA .332 → .266; ISO .159 → .125; BABIP .325 → .302. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Tigers · 182 PAwOBA .334 → .238 (−96)K% 26.9% → 38.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.92% | ÷1.001 | ×1.440 | — | — | 38.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.64% | ÷0.996 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 7.83% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.30% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 2.36% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.59% | ÷0.974 | ×0.820 | ×1.006 | ×0.995 | 17.36% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.86% | ÷0.992 | ×0.720 | ×1.006 | ×0.995 | 4.99% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.94% | ÷0.900 | ×0.720 | ×1.006 | ×0.995 | 2.36% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.92% | ÷0.880 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 3.46% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 95, 2B 98, 3B 80, K 100, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.006.
Result: wOBA .334 → .238; ISO .166 → .124; BABIP .310 → .250. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Tigers · 160 PAwOBA .299 → .206 (−94)K% 30.0% → 43.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.00% | ÷0.991 | ×1.440 | — | — | 43.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.37% | ÷1.040 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 8.63% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.50% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 1.81% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.18% | ÷0.993 | ×0.820 | ×1.046 | ×1.008 | 18.44% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.53% | ÷0.981 | ×0.720 | ×1.046 | ×1.008 | 2.73% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.18% | ÷0.947 | ×0.720 | ×1.046 | ×1.008 | 0.94% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.71% | ÷0.952 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 3.89% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 99, 2B 96, 3B 89, K 98, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.046.
Result: wOBA .299 → .206; ISO .128 → .090; BABIP .272 → .230. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 DSLDSL Tigers 2 · 153 PAwOBA .408 → .269 (−139)K% 23.5% → 29.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.53% | ÷0.983 | ×1.220 | — | — | 29.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 21.57% | ÷0.997 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 15.25% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.61% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 1.84% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.21% | ÷1.012 | ×0.680 | ×0.990 | ×1.008 | 18.91% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.13% | ÷1.101 | ×0.600 | ×0.990 | ×1.008 | 2.79% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.28% | ÷1.009 | ×0.600 | ×0.990 | ×1.008 | 0.76% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.41% | ÷1.009 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 3.01% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 102, 2B 120, 3B 102, K 97, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.
Result: wOBA .408 → .269; ISO .184 → .096; BABIP .360 → .226. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).