Diego Dugarte
P ACL Cubs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 20 | ROKDSL Cubs Blue | 12 | 11 | 48 | 3.21 | 2.47 | 21.7% | 5.1% | — | K 14.8% · BB 6.3% · FIP 3.43 |
| 2024 | 21 | ROKCHC | 12 | 7 | 30 | 5.46 | 5.49 | 16.7% | 15.9% | — | K 11.3% · BB 19.9% · FIP 7.15 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBCHC | — | — | 0 | 4.83 | 4.83 | 22.4% | 12.6% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 25 | MLBCHC | 2 | 2 | 9 | 4.70 | 4.64 | 22.9% | 11.4% | 0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs Blue | 12 | 5 | 37 | 162 | 20 | 24 | 2 | 42% | 3.1 | 8.4% | 18.5% | -10.1% | 1.8% | 2.92 | 5.75 | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Cubs Blue | 12 | 5 | 37 | 162 | 20 | 24 | 2 | 42% | 3.1 | 12.3% | 14.8% | -2.5% | 1.2% | 2.92 | 4.67 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs Blue | 12 | 11 | 48 | 198 | 43 | 10 | 2 | 92% | 4.0 | 14.8% | 6.3% | 8.5% | 1.4% | 3.21 | 3.43 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL Cubs Blue | 12 | 11 | 48 | 198 | 43 | 10 | 2 | 92% | 4.0 | 21.7% | 5.1% | 16.7% | 1.0% | 3.21 | 2.47 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Cubs | 12 | 7 | 30 | 132 | 22 | 21 | 4 | 58% | 2.5 | 11.3% | 19.9% | -8.6% | 4.5% | 5.46 | 7.15 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Cubs | 12 | 7 | 30 | 132 | 22 | 21 | 4 | 58% | 2.5 | 11.3% | 19.9% | -8.6% | 4.5% | 5.46 | 7.15 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK RAW | ACL Cubs | 12 | 7 | 30 | 132 | 22 | 21 | 4 | 58% | 2.5 | 16.7% | 15.9% | 0.8% | 3.0% | 5.46 | 5.49 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | CHC | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.4% | 12.6% | 9.8% | 3.0% | 4.83 | 4.83 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | CHC | 3 | 3 | 20 | 84 | 19 | 10 | 3 | 100% | 6.7 | 22.9% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 3.0% | 4.70 | 4.64 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | CHC | 2 | 2 | 9 | 38 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 4.5 | 22.9% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 3.0% | 4.70 | 4.64 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 9 | 36 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 8.6 | 22.9% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 3.0% | 4.70 | 4.26 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 187 | 94 | 23 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.9% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 3.0% | 4.70 | 4.26 | +2.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 36 | 23 | 114 | 492 | 58 | 69 | 12 | 64% | 3.2 | 11.7% | 14.0% | -2.2% | 2.4% | 3.70 | 5.19 | +0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 63 | 40 | 200 | 861 | 101 | 120 | 21 | 64% | 3.2 | 11.7% | 14.0% | -2.2% | 2.4% | 3.70 | 5.19 | +1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 ROKACL Cubs · 30 IPFIP 5.37 → 7.15 (+1.78)K% 16.7% → 11.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.67% | — | ×0.680 | 11.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.91% | — | ×1.250 | 19.89% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.03% | ÷0.935 | ×1.400 | 4.54% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 5.37 → 7.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Cubs Blue · 48 IPFIP 2.46 → 3.43 (+0.97)K% 21.7% → 14.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.72% | — | ×0.680 | 14.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.05% | — | ×1.250 | 6.31% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.01% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 1.41% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.46 → 3.43, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL Cubs Blue · 37 IPFIP 4.61 → 5.75 (+1.14)K% 12.3% → 8.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.35% | — | ×0.680 | 8.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.81% | — | ×1.250 | 18.52% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.23% | ÷0.935 | ×1.400 | 1.85% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 4.61 → 5.75, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).