Thomas Harrington
P Indianapolis Indians| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | MIX3 levels | 22 | 21 | 117 | 2.61 | 2.62 | 25.1% | 4.1% | — | K 20.6% · BB 4.1% · FIP 3.31 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 24 | 21 | 105 | 6.19 | 5.25 | 20.9% | 8.6% | 0.2 | K 18.2% · BB 7.9% · FIP 5.79 |
| 2026 | 25 | AAAPIT | 33 | 14 | 102 | 6.02 | 4.05 | 21.3% | 9.1% | — | K 18.3% · BB 8.1% · FIP 4.27 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBPIT | 4 | 4 | 22 | 5.06 | 4.83 | 17.7% | 7.0% | 0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ55% MLB | 27 | MLBPIT | 8 | 8 | 45 | 4.74 | 4.66 | 18.1% | 7.1% | 0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ70% MLB | 28 | MLBPIT | 9 | 9 | 54 | 4.70 | 4.71 | 18.3% | 7.3% | 0.3 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 26 | 127 | 526 | 146 | 41 | 14 | 100% | 4.9 | 21.1% | 9.0% | 12.1% | 2.9% | 3.53 | 4.07 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 26 | 127 | 526 | 146 | 41 | 14 | 100% | 4.9 | 27.8% | 7.8% | 20.0% | 2.7% | 3.53 | 3.20 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 22 | 21 | 117 | 458 | 115 | 19 | 9 | 95% | 5.3 | 20.6% | 4.1% | 16.6% | 2.6% | 2.61 | 3.31 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 22 | 21 | 117 | 458 | 115 | 19 | 9 | 95% | 5.3 | 20.6% | 4.1% | 16.6% | 2.6% | 2.61 | 3.31 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 22 | 21 | 117 | 458 | 115 | 19 | 9 | 95% | 5.3 | 25.1% | 4.1% | 21.0% | 2.0% | 2.61 | 2.62 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 21 | 105 | 465 | 97 | 40 | 23 | 88% | 4.4 | 18.2% | 7.9% | 10.3% | 5.9% | 6.19 | 5.79 | -0.5 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 21 | 105 | 465 | 97 | 40 | 23 | 88% | 4.4 | 18.2% | 7.9% | 10.3% | 5.9% | 6.19 | 5.79 | -0.5 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 24 | 21 | 105 | 465 | 97 | 40 | 23 | 88% | 4.4 | 20.9% | 8.6% | 12.3% | 4.9% | 6.19 | 5.25 | +0.2 |
| 2026 | 25 | AAA MLE | Indianapolis Indians | 33 | 14 | 102 | 464 | 99 | 42 | 13 | 42% | 3.1 | 18.3% | 8.1% | 10.2% | 3.1% | 6.02 | 4.27 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AAA MLE | Indianapolis Indians | 33 | 14 | 102 | 464 | 99 | 42 | 13 | 42% | 3.1 | 18.3% | 8.1% | 10.2% | 3.1% | 6.02 | 4.27 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AAA RAW | Indianapolis Indians | 33 | 14 | 102 | 464 | 99 | 42 | 13 | 42% | 3.1 | 21.3% | 9.1% | 12.3% | 2.8% | 6.02 | 4.05 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 3 | 1 | 9 | 50 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 33% | 2.9 | 14.0% | 14.0% | 0.0% | 6.0% | 15.58 | 8.41 | -0.4 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | PIT | 4 | 4 | 22 | 93 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 100% | 5.5 | 17.7% | 7.0% | 10.7% | 3.6% | 5.06 | 4.83 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | PIT | 14 | 14 | 82 | 346 | 63 | 25 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 18.1% | 7.1% | 11.0% | 3.6% | 4.89 | 4.81 | +0.6 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | PIT | 13 | 13 | 76 | 323 | 59 | 24 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 18.3% | 7.3% | 11.0% | 3.6% | 4.85 | 4.86 | +0.5 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB MLE | PIT | 12 | 12 | 70 | 296 | 54 | 22 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 18.2% | 7.6% | 10.7% | 3.7% | 4.90 | 4.96 | +0.3 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB MLE | PIT | 11 | 11 | 63 | 266 | 48 | 21 | 10 | 100% | 5.7 | 18.0% | 7.9% | 10.1% | 3.9% | 5.02 | 5.11 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | PIT | 8 | 8 | 45 | 190 | 34 | 14 | 6 | 100% | 5.6 | 18.1% | 7.1% | 11.0% | 3.3% | 4.74 | 4.66 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | PIT | 9 | 9 | 54 | 228 | 42 | 17 | 8 | 100% | 6.0 | 18.3% | 7.3% | 11.0% | 3.4% | 4.70 | 4.71 | +0.3 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB CTX | PIT | 9 | 9 | 55 | 232 | 42 | 18 | 8 | 100% | 6.1 | 18.2% | 7.6% | 10.7% | 3.5% | 4.75 | 4.81 | +0.3 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB CTX | PIT | 9 | 9 | 53 | 224 | 40 | 18 | 8 | 100% | 5.9 | 18.0% | 7.9% | 10.1% | 3.6% | 4.86 | 4.95 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 37 | 35 | 215 | 919 | 165 | 72 | 33 | 95% | 5.8 | 17.9% | 7.8% | 10.1% | 3.6% | 5.20 | 4.55 | +2.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 35 | 33 | 200 | 857 | 154 | 67 | 31 | 95% | 5.7 | 17.9% | 7.8% | 10.1% | 3.6% | 5.20 | 4.55 | +2.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 105 | 82 | 451 | 1913 | 375 | 141 | 69 | 78% | 4.3 | 19.6% | 7.3% | 12.3% | 3.6% | 4.47 | 4.35 | +1.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 47 | 36 | 200 | 848 | 166 | 62 | 31 | 78% | 4.3 | 19.6% | 7.3% | 12.3% | 3.6% | 4.47 | 4.35 | +0.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 102 IPFIP 3.98 → 4.27 (+0.29)K% 21.3% → 18.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.34% | — | ×0.860 | 18.35% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.05% | — | ×0.900 | 8.15% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.80% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 3.08% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.98 → 4.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 96 IPFIP 4.92 → 5.61 (+0.69)K% 21.7% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.69% | — | ×0.860 | 18.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.95% | — | ×0.900 | 7.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.82% | ÷0.915 | ×1.100 | 5.79% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 4.92 → 5.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAltoona Curve · 68 IPFIP 2.07 → 2.90 (+0.83)K% 27.4% → 22.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.41% | — | ×0.810 | 22.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.70% | — | ×1.100 | 4.07% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.48% | ÷0.844 | ×1.200 | 2.11% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 2.07 → 2.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 46 IPFIP 3.41 → 3.92 (+0.52)K% 21.2% → 18.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.23% | — | ×0.860 | 18.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.47% | — | ×0.900 | 4.02% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.79% | ÷0.909 | ×1.100 | 3.38% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 3.41 → 3.92, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Greensboro Grasshoppers · 88 IPFIP 3.30 → 4.06 (+0.76)K% 28.2% → 21.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.19% | — | ×0.770 | 21.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.71% | — | ×1.150 | 8.87% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.93% | ÷1.202 | ×1.250 | 3.04% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 140).
Result: FIP 3.30 → 4.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ABradenton Marauders · 39 IPFIP 2.96 → 4.10 (+1.14)K% 26.7% → 19.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.67% | — | ×0.740 | 19.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.00% | — | ×1.180 | 9.44% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.00% | ÷0.971 | ×1.300 | 2.68% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).
Result: FIP 2.96 → 4.10, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.9 | 75 | 17.9% | 7.6% | 1.45 | 5.19 |
| Jose Cabrera ('02) | 1.4 | 68 | 16.2% | 7.9% | 1.39 | 4.95 |
| Joe Biagini ('21) | 1.7 | 83 | 19.0% | 7.9% | 1.28 | 5.03 |
| Bob Wells ('02) | 3.2 | 79 | 15.0% | 7.2% | 1.43 | 5.03 |
| Chuck Hartenstein ('66-'77, -1 WAR*) | 1.5 | 59 | 13.7%* | 7.2%* | 1.50* | 5.28* |
| Steve Kealey ('68-'73, -1 WAR*) | 1.1 | 54 | 18.5%* | 7.2%* | 1.32* | 5.26* |
| Paul Reuschel ('75-'79, 1 WAR*) | 2.0 | 79 | 16.8%* | 7.6%* | 1.29* | 4.76* |