Biembenido Brito

P ACL Rockies
Age 24 RHP 6'3" / 180 lbs ROK
Overview
ROKPROSPECT
ETA2028MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202421ROKTEX181317.764.8232.0%16.0%—K 21.8% · BB 20.0% · FIP 6.75
202522ROKCOL97332.972.4427.3%12.9%—K 18.6% · BB 16.2% · FIP 3.58
2027PROJ24MLBCOL——05.065.0622.3%14.5%—
2028PROJ43% MLB25MLBCOL100104.884.8022.8%12.9%-0.0
Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
CompsTrent Fennell (age 23) · Ray Gaither (age 24) · Jeff Niemann (age 25)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 129121vR 113
ERA5.06
FIP5.06
K%22.3%
BB%14.5%
K-BB%7.8%
Proj IP20
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 20 IP
K: +0.0 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)+0KBB: -1.4 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-1BBCONTACT: -0.6 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-1CONTACTSTAM: +0.8 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+1STAMTotal WAR: -0.12 (20 IP)-0.1WAR
-0.10.02728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
202219ROK MLEACL Rangers1110391766426391%3.624.7%18.5%6.3%2.3%4.814.64—
202219ROK RAWACL Rangers1110391766426391%3.636.4%14.8%21.6%1.7%4.812.82—
202320ROK MLEACL Rangers12126136302728%2.215.0%24.8%-9.8%1.8%9.235.98—
202320ROK RAWACL Rangers12126136302728%2.222.1%19.9%2.2%1.5%9.234.88—
202421ROK MLEACL Rangers18131150482466%1.721.8%20.0%1.8%5.4%7.766.75—
202421ROK MLEACL Rangers18131150482466%1.721.8%20.0%1.8%5.4%7.766.75—
202421ROK RAWACL Rangers18131150482466%1.732.0%16.0%16.0%4.0%7.764.82—
202522ROK MLEACL Rockies97331393818078%3.718.6%16.2%2.4%0.0%2.973.58—
202522ROK MLEACL Rockies97331393818078%3.718.6%16.2%2.4%0.0%2.973.58—
202522ROK RAWACL Rockies97331393818078%3.727.3%12.9%14.4%0.0%2.972.44—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202724MLBCOL——0——————22.3%14.5%7.8%3.0%5.065.06—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202825MLB MLECOL2202399231330%1.122.8%12.9%9.9%2.9%4.884.80-0.1
202825MLB CTXCOL100104210510%1.022.8%12.9%9.9%2.9%4.884.80-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW100104210510%1.022.8%12.9%9.9%2.9%4.884.42+0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW1900200844200100200%1.122.8%12.9%9.9%2.9%4.884.42+0.3
Career— MLE50191306011221191538%2.620.4%19.8%0.6%2.4%5.945.23-0.1
/ 200 IP— MLE77292009221881822338%2.620.4%19.8%0.6%2.4%5.945.23-0.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2025 ROKACL Rockies · 33 IPFIP 2.43 → 3.58 (+1.15)K% 27.3% → 18.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF27.34%—×0.68018.59%
BB% (unintentional) /BF12.95%—×1.25016.19%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷0.970×1.4000.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).

Result: FIP 2.43 → 3.58, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 ROKACL Rangers · 31 IPFIP 4.62 → 6.75 (+2.13)K% 32.0% → 21.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF32.00%—×0.68021.76%
BB% (unintentional) /BF16.00%—×1.25020.00%
HR / BF /BF4.00%÷1.040×1.4005.39%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).

Result: FIP 4.62 → 6.75, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 ROKACL Rangers · 26 IPFIP 4.56 → 5.98 (+1.42)K% 22.1% → 15.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF22.06%—×0.68015.00%
BB% (unintentional) /BF19.85%—×1.25024.82%
HR / BF /BF1.47%÷1.124×1.4001.83%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 125).

Result: FIP 4.56 → 5.98, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 ROKACL Rangers · 39 IPFIP 2.84 → 4.64 (+1.80)K% 36.4% → 24.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF36.36%—×0.68024.73%
BB% (unintentional) /BF14.77%—×1.25018.47%
HR / BF /BF1.70%÷1.018×1.4002.34%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).

Result: FIP 2.84 → 4.64, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).