Bryan Arendt
C Lansing Lugnuts| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22 | AOAK | 71 | .136/.271/.203 | 1 | 0 | 5 | — | .113/.214/.177 |
| 2026 | 23 | A+/A/ROKOAK | 300 | .206/.314/.336 | 8 | 8 | 37 | — | .163/.246/.270 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 24 | MLBOAK | 1 | .203/.271/.316 | 0 | 0 | 62 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 25 | MLBOAK | 55 | .206/.274/.322 | 1 | 1 | 65 | 0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 26 | MLBOAK | 105 | .208/.277/.326 | 2 | 2 | 67 | 0.0 |
Tools · ContractCON 27 / POW 40
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 71 | 59 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 136 | 271 | 203 | 475 | 68 | 184 | 28 | 11 | 234 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 125 | 109 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 35 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 165 | 266 | 248 | 514 | 83 | 219 | 28 | 10 | 243 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 118 | 99 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 26 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 222 | 319 | 455 | 773 | 232 | 225 | 22 | 8 | 329 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | ROK | ACL Athletics | — | 57 | 45 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 267 | 411 | 289 | 700 | 22 | 364 | 23 | 18 | 332 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 71 | 62 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 113 | 214 | 177 | 392 | 65 | 173 | 38 | 7 | 176 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 125 | 113 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 44 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 133 | 210 | 204 | 413 | 71 | 190 | 35 | 7 | 185 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 118 | 102 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 35 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 176 | 257 | 363 | 619 | 186 | 186 | 30 | 5 | 260 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | ROK MLE | ACL Athletics | — | 57 | 49 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 19 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 204 | 304 | 224 | 528 | 20 | 285 | 33 | 11 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 71 | 62 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 113 | 214 | 177 | 392 | 65 | 176 | 38 | 7 | 176 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A RAW | Stockton Ports | — | 71 | 59 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 136 | 271 | 203 | 475 | 68 | 184 | 28 | 11 | 234 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 300 | 264 | 42 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 21 | 99 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 159 | 242 | 254 | 496 | 95 | 218 | 33 | 7 | 224 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ RAW | 3 teams | — | 300 | 253 | 52 | 9 | 0 | 8 | 32 | 74 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 206 | 314 | 336 | 650 | 130 | 249 | 25 | 11 | 294 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 71 | 63 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 111 | 214 | 175 | 389 | 63 | 173 | 38 | 7 | 176 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 300 | 268 | 42 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 21 | 99 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 157 | 242 | 250 | 492 | 93 | 206 | 33 | 7 | 224 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 71 | 63 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 111 | 214 | 175 | 389 | 63 | 173 | 38 | 7 | 176 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 300 | 268 | 42 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 21 | 99 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 157 | 242 | 250 | 492 | 93 | 206 | 33 | 7 | 224 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB MLE | OAK | 0% | 350 | 317 | 64 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 25 | 100 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 198 | 266 | 306 | 573 | 109 | 263 | 29 | 7 | 260 | 62 | -16 | +0 | +0 | +6 | +8 | 0.0 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB CTX | OAK | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 203 | 271 | 316 | 587 | 112 | 272 | 0 | 0 | 266 | 62 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | OAK | 30% | 180 | 162 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 51 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 200 | 269 | 313 | 582 | 113 | 265 | 28 | 7 | 264 | 65 | -8 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +4 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | OAK | 44% | 237 | 215 | 43 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 66 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 202 | 272 | 317 | 589 | 115 | 266 | 28 | 7 | 267 | 67 | -9 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +5 | 0.0 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | OAK | 49% | 272 | 246 | 50 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 20 | 76 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 204 | 273 | 319 | 592 | 116 | 267 | 28 | 7 | 268 | 68 | -11 | +0 | +0 | +5 | +6 | 0.1 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | OAK | 52% | 292 | 265 | 54 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 81 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 204 | 273 | 319 | 592 | 115 | 267 | 28 | 7 | 268 | 68 | -11 | +0 | -1 | +5 | +6 | -0.0 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | OAK | 51% | 296 | 268 | 54 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 82 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 203 | 273 | 317 | 590 | 114 | 267 | 28 | 7 | 267 | 67 | -12 | +0 | -1 | +5 | +6 | -0.1 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | OAK | 51% | 296 | 268 | 54 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 83 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 200 | 269 | 309 | 579 | 109 | 265 | 28 | 7 | 262 | 64 | -13 | +0 | -2 | +5 | +6 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | OAK | 30% | 55 | 50 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 206 | 274 | 322 | 597 | 116 | 274 | 29 | 7 | 270 | 65 | -2 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +1 | 0.0 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | OAK | 44% | 105 | 95 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 29 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 208 | 277 | 326 | 603 | 118 | 275 | 28 | 8 | 272 | 67 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +2 | 0.0 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | OAK | 49% | 133 | 120 | 26 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 37 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 209 | 278 | 328 | 607 | 119 | 276 | 28 | 8 | 274 | 68 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +3 | 0.0 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | OAK | 52% | 150 | 136 | 29 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 209 | 279 | 328 | 607 | 119 | 276 | 28 | 7 | 274 | 68 | -6 | +0 | -0 | +3 | +3 | -0.0 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | OAK | 51% | 152 | 138 | 29 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 209 | 278 | 326 | 604 | 117 | 276 | 28 | 7 | 273 | 67 | -6 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +3 | -0.1 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | OAK | 51% | 152 | 138 | 29 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 43 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 206 | 274 | 318 | 593 | 112 | 274 | 28 | 7 | 268 | 64 | -7 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +3 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 747 | 677 | 143 | 29 | 5 | 15 | 55 | 209 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 211 | 280 | 335 | 616 | 124 | 279 | 28 | 7 | 272 | 60 | -30 | +1 | -2 | +13 | +16 | -0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 589 | 124 | 25 | 4 | 13 | 48 | 182 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 211 | 280 | 333 | 613 | 122 | 279 | 28 | 7 | 272 | 60 | -26 | +1 | -2 | +12 | +14 | -0.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2099 | 1891 | 365 | 66 | 7 | 43 | 152 | 609 | 35 | 34 | 9 | 193 | 266 | 304 | 569 | 111 | 257 | 29 | 7 | 257 | 60 | -70 | +2 | -4 | +31 | +37 | -0.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 586 | 112 | 20 | 2 | 13 | 47 | 189 | 11 | 11 | 3 | 191 | 264 | 299 | 563 | 108 | 255 | 29 | 7 | 257 | 60 | -26 | +1 | -2 | +12 | +14 | -0.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 125 PAwOBA .239 → .185 (−54)K% 28.0% → 35.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 35.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.40% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 7.37% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.60% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 1.26% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.57% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.972 | ×0.998 | 15.67% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.05% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×0.972 | ×0.998 | 3.18% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×0.972 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.70% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 2.16% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.972.
Result: wOBA .239 → .185; ISO .083 → .062; BABIP .219 → .190. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AStockton Ports · 118 PAwOBA .331 → .260 (−71)K% 22.0% → 30.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.03% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 29.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 5.21% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.24% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 3.27% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.07% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×0.990 | 13.04% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.85% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×0.990 | 5.35% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 8.22% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 6.51% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .331 → .260; ISO .232 → .182; BABIP .225 → .186. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKACL Athletics · 57 PAwOBA .331 → .233 (−98)K% 22.8% → 32.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.81% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 32.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.54% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.965 | 10.50% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.75% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 1.22% |
| Singles /BIP | 34.38% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.965 | 27.20% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.12% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 2.17% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .331 → .233; ISO .022 → .015; BABIP .364 → .285. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AStockton Ports · 71 PAwOBA .228 → .176 (−53)K% 28.2% → 37.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.17% | ÷1.011 | ×1.360 | — | — | 37.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.27% | ÷1.029 | ×0.690 | — | — | 7.55% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.23% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 3.30% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.38% | ÷1.003 | ×0.920 | ×1.048 | — | 14.78% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.56% | ÷0.990 | ×0.830 | ×1.048 | — | 2.25% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.048 | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.56% | ÷1.113 | ×0.800 | — | — | 1.84% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 101, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 102, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.048.
Result: wOBA .228 → .176; ISO .068 → .048; BABIP .184 → .173. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).