Wilmer Flores
P Lakeland Flying Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 21 | 21 | 89 | 4.65 | 2.92 | 24.0% | 8.8% | — | K 19.7% · BB 10.4% · FIP 3.69 | |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX3 levels | 20 | 2 | 31 | 7.84 | 5.33 | 19.0% | 16.3% | — | K 15.5% · BB 16.9% · FIP 5.72 | |
| 2025 | 24 | ADET | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2.25 | 6.10 | 29.4% | 17.6% | — | K 29.4% · BB 17.6% · FIP 6.08 | |
| 2026 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBDET | — | — | 0 | 4.87 | 4.87 | 20.4% | 11.6% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ36% MLB | 27 | MLBDET | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4.84 | 4.86 | 20.7% | 11.4% | 0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 14 | 13 | 66 | 281 | 90 | 24 | 1 | 93% | 4.7 | 23.3% | 10.1% | 13.2% | 0.5% | 3.68 | 2.68 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 14 | 13 | 66 | 281 | 90 | 24 | 1 | 93% | 4.7 | 32.0% | 8.5% | 23.5% | 0.4% | 3.68 | 1.66 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 24 | 103 | 422 | 130 | 23 | 10 | 96% | 4.1 | 24.6% | 6.0% | 18.6% | 3.2% | 2.79 | 3.52 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 24 | 103 | 422 | 130 | 23 | 10 | 96% | 4.1 | 30.8% | 5.5% | 25.4% | 2.4% | 2.79 | 2.51 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 89 | 375 | 90 | 33 | 5 | 100% | 4.2 | 19.7% | 10.4% | 9.3% | 1.7% | 4.65 | 3.69 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 89 | 375 | 90 | 33 | 5 | 100% | 4.2 | 24.0% | 8.8% | 15.2% | 1.3% | 4.65 | 2.92 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 20 | 2 | 31 | 153 | 29 | 25 | 4 | 10% | 1.6 | 15.5% | 16.9% | -1.4% | 3.3% | 7.84 | 5.72 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 20 | 2 | 31 | 153 | 29 | 25 | 4 | 10% | 1.6 | 15.5% | 16.9% | -1.4% | 3.3% | 7.84 | 5.72 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 20 | 2 | 31 | 153 | 29 | 25 | 4 | 10% | 1.6 | 19.0% | 16.3% | 2.6% | 2.6% | 7.84 | 5.33 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 5 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 40% | 0.8 | 29.4% | 17.6% | 11.8% | 5.9% | 2.25 | 6.08 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 5 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 40% | 0.8 | 29.4% | 17.6% | 11.8% | 5.9% | 2.25 | 6.08 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 5 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 40% | 0.8 | 29.4% | 17.6% | 11.8% | 5.9% | 2.25 | 6.10 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | DET | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.4% | 11.6% | 8.9% | 3.0% | 4.87 | 4.87 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 3 | 3 | 20 | 84 | 17 | 10 | 3 | 100% | 6.7 | 20.7% | 11.4% | 9.3% | 3.1% | 4.84 | 4.86 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 1 | 1 | 7 | 30 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 7.0 | 20.7% | 11.4% | 9.3% | 3.1% | 4.84 | 4.86 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 7.3 | 20.7% | 11.4% | 9.3% | 3.1% | 4.84 | 4.48 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 165 | 110 | 28 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.7% | 11.4% | 9.3% | 3.1% | 4.84 | 4.48 | +2.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 85 | 62 | 293 | 1248 | 272 | 122 | 27 | 73% | 3.5 | 21.8% | 9.8% | 12.0% | 2.2% | 4.08 | 3.68 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 58 | 42 | 200 | 851 | 185 | 83 | 18 | 73% | 3.5 | 21.8% | 9.8% | 12.0% | 2.2% | 4.08 | 3.68 | +1.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 25 IPFIP 5.24 → 5.72 (+0.48)K% 18.0% → 15.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.97% | — | ×0.860 | 15.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.75% | — | ×0.900 | 16.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.34% | ÷0.792 | ×1.100 | 3.26% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 58).
Result: FIP 5.24 → 5.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAErie SeaWolves · 81 IPFIP 3.06 → 3.69 (+0.62)K% 24.3% → 19.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.33% | — | ×0.810 | 19.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.50% | — | ×1.100 | 10.45% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.48% | ÷1.055 | ×1.200 | 1.69% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 3.06 → 3.69, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 8 IPFIP 1.66 → 2.11 (+0.46)K% 21.1% → 16.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.05% | — | ×0.770 | 16.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.63% | — | ×1.150 | 3.03% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.882 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 1.66 → 2.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAErie SeaWolves · 84 IPFIP 2.82 → 3.71 (+0.89)K% 27.5% → 22.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.54% | — | ×0.810 | 22.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.09% | — | ×1.100 | 6.70% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.32% | ÷0.926 | ×1.200 | 3.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 2.82 → 3.71, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 20 IPFIP 1.02 → 2.63 (+1.61)K% 45.5% → 35.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 45.45% | — | ×0.770 | 35.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.60% | — | ×1.150 | 2.99% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.60% | ÷0.847 | ×1.250 | 3.83% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 1.02 → 2.63, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 53 IPFIP 1.87 → 2.90 (+1.02)K% 32.1% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.14% | — | ×0.740 | 23.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.82% | — | ×1.180 | 11.59% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.45% | ÷0.937 | ×1.300 | 0.62% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 1.87 → 2.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Tigers West · 13 IPFIP 0.88 → 1.84 (+0.96)K% 31.6% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.58% | — | ×0.680 | 21.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.51% | — | ×1.250 | 4.39% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.906 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 81).
Result: FIP 0.88 → 1.84, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).