Royber Salinas
P Rome Emperors| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 20 | 18 | 72 | 5.40 | 3.43 | 30.2% | 10.1% | — | K 25.0% · BB 11.8% · FIP 4.64 | |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 10 | 10 | 43 | 4.60 | 4.96 | 25.3% | 17.2% | — | K 20.6% · BB 17.3% · FIP 5.68 | |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 7 | 2 | 8 | 4.70 | 3.62 | 22.6% | 19.4% | — | K 22.6% · BB 19.4% · FIP 3.64 | |
| 2026 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBATL | — | — | 0 | 4.79 | 4.79 | 22.5% | 12.2% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 27 | MLBATL | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4.76 | 4.78 | 22.6% | 12.0% | 0.1 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Braves | 17 | 0 | 33 | 148 | 37 | 22 | 0 | 0% | 1.9 | 17.0% | 18.6% | -1.6% | 0.0% | 3.82 | 4.02 | — |
| 2019 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Braves | 17 | 0 | 33 | 148 | 37 | 22 | 0 | 0% | 1.9 | 25.0% | 14.9% | 10.1% | 0.0% | 3.82 | 2.86 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 13 | 9 | 39 | 170 | 67 | 24 | 4 | 69% | 3.0 | 27.4% | 17.3% | 10.1% | 3.1% | 2.29 | 4.69 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 13 | 9 | 39 | 170 | 67 | 24 | 4 | 69% | 3.0 | 39.4% | 14.1% | 25.3% | 2.4% | 2.29 | 2.85 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 109 | 465 | 175 | 63 | 7 | 100% | 4.4 | 28.6% | 15.7% | 13.0% | 2.0% | 3.55 | 3.75 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 109 | 465 | 175 | 63 | 7 | 100% | 4.4 | 37.6% | 13.5% | 24.1% | 1.5% | 3.55 | 2.46 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 18 | 72 | 308 | 93 | 31 | 9 | 90% | 3.6 | 25.0% | 11.8% | 13.2% | 3.9% | 5.40 | 4.64 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 20 | 18 | 72 | 308 | 93 | 31 | 9 | 90% | 3.6 | 30.2% | 10.1% | 20.1% | 2.9% | 5.40 | 3.43 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 10 | 10 | 43 | 198 | 50 | 34 | 6 | 100% | 4.3 | 20.6% | 17.3% | 3.3% | 3.9% | 4.60 | 5.68 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 10 | 10 | 43 | 198 | 50 | 34 | 6 | 100% | 4.3 | 20.6% | 17.3% | 3.3% | 3.9% | 4.60 | 5.68 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 10 | 10 | 43 | 198 | 50 | 34 | 6 | 100% | 4.3 | 25.3% | 17.2% | 8.1% | 3.0% | 4.60 | 4.96 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 7 | 2 | 8 | 31 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 29% | 1.1 | 22.6% | 19.4% | 3.2% | 0.0% | 4.70 | 3.64 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 7 | 2 | 8 | 31 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 29% | 1.1 | 22.6% | 19.4% | 3.2% | 0.0% | 4.70 | 3.64 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 7 | 2 | 8 | 31 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 29% | 1.1 | 22.6% | 19.4% | 3.2% | 0.0% | 4.70 | 3.62 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | ATL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.5% | 12.2% | 10.3% | 3.0% | 4.79 | 4.79 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | ATL | 4 | 4 | 22 | 91 | 20 | 11 | 3 | 100% | 5.4 | 22.6% | 12.0% | 10.6% | 3.1% | 4.76 | 4.78 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | ATL | 1 | 1 | 8 | 34 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 8.0 | 22.6% | 12.0% | 10.6% | 3.1% | 4.76 | 4.78 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 8 | 33 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 7.9 | 22.6% | 12.0% | 10.6% | 3.1% | 4.76 | 4.40 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 203 | 102 | 25 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.6% | 12.0% | 10.6% | 3.1% | 4.76 | 4.40 | +2.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 92 | 64 | 304 | 1320 | 330 | 207 | 34 | 70% | 3.3 | 25.0% | 15.6% | 9.3% | 2.6% | 4.03 | 4.40 | +0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 61 | 42 | 200 | 869 | 217 | 136 | 23 | 70% | 3.3 | 25.0% | 15.6% | 9.3% | 2.6% | 4.03 | 4.40 | +1.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 A+Rome Emperors · 5 IPFIP 3.68 → 4.64 (+0.96)K% 27.3% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.27% | — | ×0.770 | 21.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 22.73% | — | ×1.150 | 26.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.819 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 64).
Result: FIP 3.68 → 4.64, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAMidland RockHounds · 37 IPFIP 4.61 → 5.68 (+1.07)K% 25.5% → 20.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.45% | — | ×0.810 | 20.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.76% | — | ×1.100 | 17.33% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.03% | ÷0.940 | ×1.200 | 3.87% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 4.61 → 5.68, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 6 IPFIP 5.79 → 5.93 (+0.14)K% 24.2% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.24% | — | ×0.860 | 20.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 24.24% | — | ×0.900 | 21.82% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.03% | ÷1.001 | ×1.100 | 3.33% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.79 → 5.93, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAMidland RockHounds · 67 IPFIP 3.57 → 4.64 (+1.07)K% 30.9% → 25.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.90% | — | ×0.810 | 25.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.76% | — | ×1.100 | 11.84% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.12% | ÷0.957 | ×1.200 | 3.92% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 3.57 → 4.64, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKACL Athletics · 4 IPFIP 1.41 → 1.95 (+0.54)K% 20.0% → 13.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.680 | 13.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.989 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 1.41 → 1.95, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Rome Braves · 85 IPFIP 2.93 → 4.14 (+1.21)K% 33.1% → 25.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.06% | — | ×0.770 | 25.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.71% | — | ×1.150 | 15.77% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.61% | ÷0.928 | ×1.250 | 2.17% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 86).
Result: FIP 2.93 → 4.14, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAugusta GreenJackets · 24 IPFIP 0.60 → 2.22 (+1.61)K% 55.9% → 41.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 55.91% | — | ×0.740 | 41.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.90% | — | ×1.180 | 15.23% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.08% | ÷1.127 | ×1.300 | 1.24% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 125).
Result: FIP 0.60 → 2.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Braves · 25 IPFIP 3.17 → 5.39 (+2.22)K% 42.6% → 29.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 42.61% | — | ×0.680 | 28.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.91% | — | ×1.250 | 17.39% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.48% | ÷1.053 | ×1.400 | 4.62% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 3.17 → 5.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).