Joey Cantillo
P Cleveland Guardians| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | MIX3 levels | 20 | 18 | 78 | 4.60 | 3.89 | 28.3% | 12.2% | 1.4 | K 26.3% · BB 11.2% · FIP 3.97 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 40 | 19 | 117 | 3.55 | 3.52 | 27.6% | 10.2% | 1.4 | K 26.8% · BB 10.0% · FIP 3.57 |
| 2026 | 26 | MLBCLE | 33 | 30 | 159 | 3.62 | 3.87 | 24.9% | 11.8% | 2.9 | |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBCLE | 20 | 20 | 121 | 4.04 | 4.32 | 24.6% | 11.3% | 1.5 | |
| 2028PROJ95% MLB | 28 | MLBCLE | 16 | 16 | 94 | 4.26 | 4.40 | 24.5% | 11.5% | 1.1 | |
| 2029PROJ95% MLB | 29 | MLBCLE | 13 | 13 | 77 | 4.44 | 4.56 | 23.9% | 11.7% | 0.8 |
Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 17 | ROK MLE | AZL Padres 2 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 37 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 37.8% | 16.2% | 21.6% | 0.0% | 4.50 | 1.96 | — |
| 2017 | 17 | ROK RAW | AZL Padres 2 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 37 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 37.8% | 16.2% | 21.6% | 0.0% | 4.50 | 1.85 | — |
| 2018 | 18 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 10 | 49 | 201 | 63 | 15 | 0 | 83% | 4.1 | 21.6% | 8.2% | 13.4% | 0.0% | 2.76 | 2.32 | — |
| 2018 | 18 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 12 | 10 | 49 | 201 | 63 | 15 | 0 | 83% | 4.1 | 31.3% | 7.5% | 23.9% | 0.0% | 2.76 | 1.45 | — |
| 2019 | 19 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 22 | 112 | 432 | 144 | 34 | 5 | 100% | 5.1 | 24.8% | 9.2% | 15.5% | 1.4% | 2.26 | 2.96 | — |
| 2019 | 19 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 22 | 22 | 112 | 432 | 144 | 34 | 5 | 100% | 5.1 | 33.3% | 7.9% | 25.5% | 1.2% | 2.26 | 2.02 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 7 | 2 | 13 | 58 | 19 | 11 | 0 | 29% | 1.9 | 32.8% | 19.0% | 13.8% | 0.0% | 2.77 | 2.74 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 7 | 2 | 13 | 58 | 19 | 11 | 0 | 29% | 1.9 | 32.8% | 19.0% | 13.8% | 0.0% | 2.77 | 2.72 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | 14 | 13 | 61 | 245 | 87 | 28 | 2 | 93% | 4.3 | 28.8% | 12.6% | 16.2% | 1.0% | 1.93 | 2.79 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | AA RAW | Akron RubberDucks | 14 | 13 | 61 | 245 | 87 | 28 | 2 | 93% | 4.3 | 35.5% | 11.4% | 24.1% | 0.8% | 1.93 | 2.05 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 24 | 119 | 522 | 146 | 69 | 18 | 92% | 4.6 | 23.7% | 12.4% | 11.3% | 3.8% | 4.07 | 4.73 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 24 | 119 | 522 | 146 | 69 | 18 | 92% | 4.6 | 28.0% | 13.2% | 14.8% | 3.4% | 4.07 | 4.35 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 20 | 18 | 78 | 343 | 97 | 42 | 10 | 90% | 3.9 | 26.3% | 11.2% | 15.1% | 3.0% | 4.60 | 3.97 | +1.3 |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 20 | 18 | 78 | 343 | 97 | 42 | 10 | 90% | 3.9 | 26.3% | 11.2% | 15.1% | 3.0% | 4.60 | 3.97 | +1.3 |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 20 | 18 | 78 | 343 | 97 | 42 | 10 | 90% | 3.9 | 28.3% | 12.2% | 16.0% | 2.9% | 4.60 | 3.89 | +1.4 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 40 | 19 | 117 | 490 | 135 | 50 | 13 | 48% | 2.9 | 26.8% | 10.0% | 16.7% | 2.7% | 3.55 | 3.57 | +1.4 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 40 | 19 | 117 | 490 | 135 | 50 | 13 | 48% | 2.9 | 26.8% | 10.0% | 16.7% | 2.7% | 3.55 | 3.57 | +1.4 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 40 | 19 | 117 | 490 | 135 | 50 | 13 | 48% | 2.9 | 27.6% | 10.2% | 17.3% | 2.7% | 3.55 | 3.52 | +1.4 |
| 2026 | 26 | MLB MLE | Cleveland Guardians | 33 | 30 | 159 | 687 | 171 | 81 | 17 | 91% | 4.8 | 24.9% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 2.5% | 3.62 | 3.85 | +2.9 |
| 2026 | 26 | MLB MLE | Cleveland Guardians | 33 | 30 | 159 | 687 | 171 | 81 | 17 | 91% | 4.8 | 24.9% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 2.5% | 3.62 | 3.85 | +2.9 |
| 2026 | 26 | MLB RAW | Cleveland Guardians | 33 | 30 | 159 | 687 | 171 | 81 | 17 | 91% | 4.8 | 24.9% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 2.5% | 3.62 | 3.87 | +2.9 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 76 | 51 | 293 | 1251 | 323 | 138 | 33 | 67% | 3.9 | 25.8% | 11.0% | 14.8% | 2.6% | 3.66 | 3.77 | +5.7 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | CLE | 20 | 20 | 121 | 511 | 126 | 58 | 14 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.6% | 11.3% | 13.3% | 2.7% | 4.04 | 4.32 | +1.5 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | CLE | 16 | 16 | 99 | 417 | 102 | 48 | 12 | 100% | 6.2 | 24.5% | 11.5% | 13.0% | 2.8% | 4.26 | 4.40 | +1.2 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB MLE | CLE | 13 | 13 | 81 | 341 | 81 | 40 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 23.9% | 11.7% | 12.2% | 2.9% | 4.44 | 4.56 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB MLE | CLE | 11 | 11 | 66 | 277 | 64 | 33 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.2% | 12.0% | 11.2% | 3.1% | 4.64 | 4.77 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 31 | MLB MLE | CLE | 9 | 9 | 51 | 216 | 48 | 27 | 7 | 100% | 5.7 | 22.4% | 12.3% | 10.1% | 3.4% | 4.86 | 5.00 | +0.2 |
| 2032 | 32 | MLB MLE | CLE | 6 | 6 | 37 | 157 | 34 | 20 | 6 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.6% | 12.7% | 8.9% | 3.6% | 5.10 | 5.26 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | CLE | 16 | 16 | 94 | 397 | 97 | 46 | 11 | 100% | 5.9 | 24.5% | 11.5% | 13.0% | 2.8% | 4.26 | 4.40 | +1.1 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB CTX | CLE | 13 | 13 | 77 | 325 | 78 | 38 | 10 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.9% | 11.7% | 12.2% | 2.9% | 4.44 | 4.56 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB CTX | CLE | 10 | 10 | 62 | 262 | 61 | 31 | 8 | 100% | 6.2 | 23.2% | 12.0% | 11.2% | 3.1% | 4.64 | 4.77 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 31 | MLB CTX | CLE | 8 | 8 | 49 | 207 | 46 | 26 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.4% | 12.3% | 10.1% | 3.4% | 4.86 | 5.00 | +0.2 |
| 2032 | 32 | MLB CTX | CLE | 6 | 6 | 35 | 148 | 32 | 19 | 5 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.6% | 12.7% | 8.9% | 3.6% | 5.10 | 5.26 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 129 | 104 | 610 | 2588 | 636 | 297 | 74 | 81% | 4.7 | 24.6% | 11.5% | 13.1% | 2.9% | 4.12 | 4.05 | +9.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 42 | 34 | 200 | 849 | 209 | 97 | 24 | 81% | 4.7 | 24.6% | 11.5% | 13.1% | 2.9% | 4.12 | 4.05 | +3.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 181 | 138 | 716 | 3015 | 770 | 338 | 69 | 76% | 4.0 | 25.5% | 11.2% | 14.3% | 2.3% | 3.37 | 3.61 | +8.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 51 | 39 | 200 | 843 | 215 | 94 | 19 | 76% | 4.0 | 25.5% | 11.2% | 14.3% | 2.3% | 3.37 | 3.61 | +2.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAAColumbus Clippers · 21 IPFIP 3.53 → 3.78 (+0.26)K% 30.3% → 26.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.34% | — | ×0.860 | 26.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.99% | — | ×0.900 | 8.09% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.37% | ÷1.093 | ×1.100 | 3.39% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).
Result: FIP 3.53 → 3.78, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAColumbus Clippers · 38 IPFIP 3.72 → 3.93 (+0.22)K% 29.8% → 25.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.82% | — | ×0.860 | 25.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.62% | — | ×0.900 | 13.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.34% | ÷1.060 | ×1.100 | 2.43% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 3.72 → 3.93, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAAColumbus Clippers · 95 IPFIP 4.60 → 4.87 (+0.27)K% 26.1% → 22.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.12% | — | ×0.860 | 22.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.94% | — | ×0.900 | 11.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.76% | ÷1.037 | ×1.100 | 3.99% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 4.60 → 4.87, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAAkron RubberDucks · 24 IPFIP 3.01 → 4.14 (+1.12)K% 36.1% → 29.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.08% | — | ×0.810 | 29.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.43% | — | ×1.100 | 15.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.06% | ÷0.909 | ×1.200 | 2.72% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 3.01 → 4.14, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAAkron RubberDucks · 61 IPFIP 2.00 → 2.79 (+0.80)K% 35.5% → 28.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.51% | — | ×0.810 | 28.76% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.43% | — | ×1.100 | 12.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.82% | ÷1.014 | ×1.200 | 0.97% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 2.00 → 2.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAAkron RubberDucks · 8 IPFIP 3.72 → 4.50 (+0.78)K% 29.3% → 23.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.27% | — | ×0.810 | 23.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 24.39% | — | ×1.100 | 26.83% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.893 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 79).
Result: FIP 3.72 → 4.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AFort Wayne TinCaps · 98 IPFIP 1.54 → 2.53 (+0.99)K% 34.7% → 25.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.69% | — | ×0.740 | 25.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.32% | — | ×1.180 | 8.63% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.81% | ÷1.151 | ×1.300 | 0.92% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 130).
Result: FIP 1.54 → 2.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Lake Elsinore Storm · 14 IPFIP 4.11 → 5.49 (+1.38)K% 25.4% → 19.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.40% | — | ×0.770 | 19.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.11% | — | ×1.150 | 12.78% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.17% | ÷0.900 | ×1.250 | 4.41% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 80).
Result: FIP 4.11 → 5.49, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.7 | 83 | 24.6% | 11.5% | 1.10 | 4.12 |
| Bobby Castillo ('77-'85, 5 WAR*) | 3.4 | 86 | 22.3%* | 11.3%* | 1.23* | 4.27* |
| Danny Frisella ('67-'76, 4 WAR*) | 3.0 | 68 | 24.8%* | 11.0%* | 1.25* | 3.99* |
| Dick Selma ('65-'74, 6 WAR*) | 4.2 | 93 | 24.5%* | 11.1%* | 1.12* | 4.28* |
| Brandon Morrow ('18) | 4.3 | 78 | 24.0% | 10.1% | 0.92 | 3.96 |
| Darren Dreifort ('04) | 4.4 | 97 | 21.2% | 10.3% | 0.93 | 4.36 |
| Junior Guerra ('21) | 2.5 | 85 | 21.2% | 10.9% | 1.17 | 4.06 |