Enyer Dominguez

P DSL Blue Jays Blue

Age 20 RHP 6'5" / 173 lbs ROK

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2025	18	ROKDSL Blue Jays…	15	18	5.00	4.21	15.1%	17.2%	—	K 10.2% · BB 21.5% · FIP 4.96
2026	19	ROKDSL Blue Jays…	5	4	19.64	9.10	4.5%	36.4%	—	K 4.5% · BB 36.4% · FIP 7.32
2027PROJ	20	MLBTOR	10	11	5.24	5.24	21.3%	15.3%	-0.1
2028PROJ49% MLB	21	MLBTOR	10	10	5.01	4.91	21.9%	13.4%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 0 / P90 0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 100%

CompsSamuel Carpio (age 21) · Michael Perez (age 21) · Michael Brewer (age 20)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 133125vR 116

ERA5.24

FIP5.24

K%21.3%

BB%15.3%

K-BB%6.1%

Proj IP11

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 11 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5050

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2025	18	ROK MLE	DSL Blue Jays Blue	15	0	18	93	14	16	0	0%	1.2	10.2%	21.5%	-11.3%	0.0%	5.00	4.96	—
2025	18	ROK MLE	DSL Blue Jays Blue	15	0	18	93	14	16	0	0%	1.2	10.2%	21.5%	-11.3%	0.0%	5.00	4.96	—
2025	18	ROK RAW	DSL Blue Jays Blue	15	0	18	93	14	16	0	0%	1.2	15.1%	17.2%	-2.2%	0.0%	5.00	4.21	—
2026	19	ROK MLE	DSL Blue Jays Blue	5	0	4	22	1	8	0	0%	0.7	4.5%	36.4%	-31.8%	0.0%	19.64	7.32	—
2026	19	ROK MLE	DSL Blue Jays Blue	5	0	4	22	1	8	0	0%	0.7	4.5%	36.4%	-31.8%	0.0%	19.64	7.32	—
2026	19	ROK RAW	DSL Blue Jays Blue	5	0	4	22	1	8	0	0%	0.7	4.5%	36.4%	-31.8%	0.0%	19.64	9.10	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	20	MLB	TOR	10	0	11	46	10	7	1	0%	1.1	21.3%	15.3%	6.1%	3.0%	5.24	5.24	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	21	MLB MLE	TOR	19	0	20	84	19	11	2	0%	1.1	21.9%	13.4%	8.6%	2.9%	5.01	4.91	-0.1
2028	21	MLB CTX	TOR	10	0	10	42	9	6	1	0%	1.0	21.9%	13.4%	8.6%	2.9%	5.01	4.91	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		9	0	10	42	9	6	1	0%	1.1	21.9%	13.4%	8.6%	2.9%	5.01	4.53	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	183	122	20	0%	1.1	21.9%	13.4%	8.6%	2.9%	5.01	4.53	+0.0
Career	—	MLE		20	0	22	115	11	28	0	0%	1.1	9.1%	24.3%	-15.2%	0.0%	7.48	5.41	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		185	0	200	1062	97	258	0	0%	1.1	9.1%	24.3%	-15.2%	0.0%	7.48	5.41	-0.8

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Enyer Dominguez (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.24	21.3%	15.3%	3.0%	—	4.91	21.9%	8.6%	20	-0.33	—	—	—
Samuel Carpio R 2024 · 4.20 FIP	21	SU	4.20	21.2%	15.3%	1.7%	.300	5.36	21.6%	-3.4%	112	+1.16	4.20	134	89
Michael Perez R 2024 · 5.44 FIP	21	SU	5.44	18.3%	16.1%	3.4%	.296	4.65	23.4%	7.7%	132	-0.79	4.38	153	87
Michael Brewer R 2021 · 4.30 FIP	20	SU	4.30	23.7%	16.2%	2.1%	.303	4.69	19.7%	6.3%	114	+0.39	3.14	144	87
Kyle Hinton R 2018 · 4.17 FIP	21	SU	4.17	23.5%	15.0%	2.1%	.275	5.69	17.7%	-0.7%	75	+1.52	4.17	106	86
Brandon Dufault R 2021 · 5.32 FIP	22	SU	5.32	22.1%	15.9%	3.8%	.278	4.83	21.0%	4.2%	66	-0.49	4.38	152	86
Drew Pestka R 2024 · 4.26 FIP	20	SU	4.26	19.0%	15.1%	1.6%	.298	4.55	18.1%	0.7%	83	+0.29	3.42	100	86
Paul Gervase R 2022 · 4.91 FIP	22	SU	4.91	20.3%	16.2%	2.7%	.345	3.76	29.3%	16.0%	152	-1.15	3.38	211	86
Kasey Ford R 2021 · 4.89 FIP	23	SU	4.89	20.3%	14.5%	3.0%	.310	4.26	21.9%	5.8%	98	-0.63	2.53	114	85
Tim Naughton R 2017 · 4.53 FIP	21	SU	4.53	17.9%	15.6%	1.8%	.312	3.58	20.7%	6.4%	83	-0.95	2.93	305	85
Tommy DeJuneas R 2017 · 4.72 FIP	21	SU	4.72	19.1%	15.5%	2.3%	.357	4.59	20.8%	4.9%	100	-0.13	3.93	178	85
Isaac Gallegos R 2024 · 4.40 FIP	21	SU	4.40	22.9%	17.8%	1.8%	.267	3.09	19.9%	10.5%	106	-1.31	2.89	125	85
Andrew Schultz R 2019 · 5.25 FIP	22	SU	5.25	20.9%	17.8%	3.0%	.345	4.59	23.0%	4.7%	45	-0.66	3.56	176	85
Nolan Sparks R 2024 · 4.10 FIP	21	SU	4.10	21.8%	13.5%	2.1%	.229	4.72	19.3%	5.3%	140	+0.62	4.10	155	85
Luis Alvarado R 2018 · 5.24 FIP	21	SU	5.24	20.2%	12.4%	4.2%	.276	5.16	18.7%	4.4%	140	-0.08	4.89	162	85
Chase Ingram R 2015 · 4.11 FIP	20	SU	4.11	23.2%	15.8%	1.8%	.244	4.14	15.8%	3.0%	154	+0.03	4.04	174	85
Ty Tice R 2017 · 4.29 FIP	21	SU	4.29	22.2%	12.9%	2.6%	.271	3.53	19.4%	8.3%	108	-0.76	3.24	288	84
Anthony Hoopii-Tuionetoa R 2021 · 4.14 FIP	20	SU	4.14	25.1%	13.3%	2.7%	.327	3.29	23.8%	13.4%	81	-0.85	3.21	104	84
Gerson Moreno R 2016 · 4.48 FIP	20	SU	4.48	18.6%	14.8%	2.0%	.278	4.13	23.0%	9.1%	67	-0.35	3.37	349	84
Daniel Procopio R 2017 · 4.33 FIP	21	SU	4.33	23.4%	18.8%	1.5%	.283	4.43	20.5%	6.5%	81	+0.10	4.16	103	84
Erbert Gonzalez R 2016 · 5.52 FIP	20	SU	5.52	23.8%	15.2%	4.5%	.295	4.56	20.9%	4.0%	60	-0.96	3.76	106	84