Aneudy Almonte

P ACL Dodgers

Age 19 LHP 6'1" / 160 lbs ROK

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2025	17	ROKDSL LAD Mega	13	8	38	5.21	3.34	26.1%	14.2%	—	K 17.8% · BB 17.8% · FIP 4.71
2026	18	ROKLAD	14	0	14	18.84	9.45	11.1%	29.3%	—	K 7.6% · BB 36.6% · FIP 8.65
2027PROJ	19	MLBLAD	12	0	13	6.06	6.06	18.7%	20.0%	-0.2
2028PROJ49% MLB	20	MLBLAD	17	0	18	5.67	5.53	19.9%	16.8%	-0.2

Next 2 projected WAR -0.4Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 0 / P90 0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 98%

CompsRoberto Medina (age 19) · Develson Aria (age 18) · Daniel Gonzalez (age 19)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 132140vR 148

ERA6.06

FIP6.06

K%18.7%

BB%20.0%

K-BB%-1.3%

Proj IP13

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 13 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†4545

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2025	17	ROK MLE	DSL LAD Mega	13	8	38	176	46	25	2	62%	2.9	17.8%	17.8%	0.0%	1.6%	5.21	4.71	—
2025	17	ROK MLE	DSL LAD Mega	13	8	38	176	46	25	2	62%	2.9	17.8%	17.8%	0.0%	1.6%	5.21	4.71	—
2025	17	ROK RAW	DSL LAD Mega	13	8	38	176	46	25	2	62%	2.9	26.1%	14.2%	11.9%	1.1%	5.21	3.34	—
2026	18	ROK MLE	ACL Dodgers	14	0	14	99	11	29	2	0%	1.0	7.6%	36.6%	-29.1%	2.8%	18.84	8.65	—
2026	18	ROK MLE	ACL Dodgers	14	0	14	99	11	29	2	0%	1.0	7.6%	36.6%	-29.1%	2.8%	18.84	8.65	—
2026	18	ROK RAW	ACL Dodgers	14	0	14	99	11	29	2	0%	1.0	11.1%	29.3%	-18.2%	2.0%	18.84	9.45	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	19	MLB	LAD	12	0	13	55	10	11	2	0%	1.1	18.7%	20.0%	-1.3%	3.0%	6.06	6.06	-0.2
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	20	MLB MLE	LAD	34	0	36	152	30	26	4	0%	1.1	19.9%	16.8%	3.0%	2.9%	5.67	5.53	-0.4
2028	20	MLB CTX	LAD	17	0	18	76	15	13	2	0%	1.1	19.9%	16.8%	3.0%	2.9%	5.67	5.53	-0.2
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		17	0	18	75	15	13	2	0%	1.0	19.9%	16.8%	3.0%	2.9%	5.67	5.15	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	170	147	23	0%	1.1	19.9%	16.8%	3.0%	2.9%	5.67	5.15	-1.4
Career	—	MLE		27	8	52	275	39	68	6	30%	1.9	14.1%	24.5%	-10.5%	2.0%	8.94	6.13	-0.4
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		103	31	200	1051	148	258	21	30%	1.9	14.1%	24.5%	-10.5%	2.0%	8.94	6.13	-2.3

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Aneudy Almonte (OGILVIE)	—	—	6.06	18.7%	20.0%	3.0%	—	5.53	19.9%	3.0%	36	-0.53	—	—	—
Roberto Medina L 2024 · 5.29 FIP	19	SW	5.29	18.5%	19.6%	2.3%	.254	5.91	15.1%	-2.7%	45	+0.62	3.87	109	85
Develson Aria L 2019 · 5.19 FIP	18	SU	5.19	15.5%	19.7%	1.6%	.311	4.33	21.7%	3.1%	54	-0.86	4.32	137	81
Daniel Gonzalez L 2021 · 5.55 FIP	19	SU	5.55	13.6%	19.1%	2.1%	.318	4.98	20.1%	2.0%	100	-0.57	4.34	136	80
Gabriel Cotto L 2019 · 5.98 FIP	19	SW	5.98	11.3%	18.4%	2.8%	.309	5.15	18.5%	2.4%	113	-0.83	5.02	236	79
Zhiorman Imbriano L 2022 · 5.72 FIP	19	SU	5.72	12.3%	21.1%	1.8%	.283	4.79	13.2%	-5.0%	65	-0.93	3.82	100	79
Yensy Bello L 2022 · 6.82 FIP	19	SU	6.82	19.9%	32.3%	2.4%	.240	3.76	17.4%	4.1%	91	-3.06	2.65	103	78
Felix Cabrera L 2021 · 6.37 FIP	19	SW	6.37	11.0%	22.5%	2.5%	.324	4.96	15.3%	-2.3%	92	-1.41	3.96	132	77
Alvaro Gamez L 2024 · 5.50 FIP	19	SW	5.50	13.2%	21.0%	1.6%	.278	7.06	15.0%	-9.3%	21	+1.56	4.57	115	77
Yordan Nodal L 2021 · 5.02 FIP	19	SW	5.02	15.7%	20.7%	1.2%	.292	5.13	14.7%	-0.2%	128	+0.11	4.94	193	76
Riger Fernandez L 2017 · 5.21 FIP	19	SW	5.21	17.5%	24.7%	0.8%	.278	4.61	17.2%	-2.3%	35	-0.60	4.61	164	75
Luis Gutierrez L 2022 · 6.38 FIP	19	SW	6.38	11.7%	20.5%	3.0%	.244	4.27	15.5%	5.5%	231	-2.11	3.26	296	74
Edgardo Ibarra L 2022 · 5.37 FIP	19	SW	5.37	16.2%	16.6%	2.8%	.250	5.26	14.4%	-5.7%	63	-0.11	5.26	142	73
Jhonny Diaz L 2015 · 5.35 FIP	19	SU	5.35	10.4%	14.0%	2.5%	.270	4.19	8.6%	-0.6%	76	-1.16	3.74	116	72
Colby Langford L 2024 · 5.34 FIP	22	SW	5.34	21.6%	22.5%	2.2%	.273	6.01	22.2%	-1.1%	110	+0.67	4.92	168	72
Jayvien Sandridge L 2018 · 5.17 FIP	19	SU	5.17	15.5%	19.0%	1.8%	.188	6.78	19.0%	-4.9%	13	+1.61	3.25	223	72
Edison Suriel L 2018 · 6.39 FIP	19	SU	6.39	16.8%	20.5%	3.8%	.341	2.16	21.4%	14.6%	17	-4.23	2.16	159	72
Andre Davis L 2015 · 6.34 FIP	21	SU	6.34	13.6%	16.7%	4.2%	.384	4.43	17.5%	9.9%	127	-1.91	4.14	154	72
Javier Navas L 2017 · 6.10 FIP	19	SW	6.10	11.1%	19.7%	2.6%	.276	—	—	—	—	—	3.63	103	72
Roberth Fernandez L 2015 · 5.66 FIP	20	SW	5.66	11.4%	16.2%	2.7%	.356	4.92	14.7%	6.3%	60	-0.74	4.92	103	71
Max Green L 2018 · 4.87 FIP	22	SU	4.87	15.7%	13.3%	2.6%	.352	4.41	13.9%	6.6%	86	-0.46	4.19	169	71