Eli Lovich

OF Myrtle Beach Pelicans
Age 21 L/L 6'4" / 185 lbs A HR -8% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2035
Overview
APROSPECTMiLBFA 2036
MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202519A/ROKCHC300.232/.307/.32541828—.175/.230/.240
202620ACHC431.196/.316/.32591430—.139/.232/.223
2027PROJMLE21MLBCHC541.168/.244/.25581042-1.1
2028PROJ34% MLB22MLBCHC130.177/.254/.2812251-0.6
Next 2 projected WAR -1.7Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2035Service0.0First FA2036
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029Ext$0.0M2030Ext$0.8M2031Ext$0.9M2032Ext$0.9M2033Ext$3M2034Ext$5M+1
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2026 A
Speed68
BB%63
ISO49
Chase%49
wRC+35
wOBA27
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 99%
CompsAaron Bracho (age 21) · Yerlin Confidan (age 21) · David Medina (age 21)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONpark-neutral Marcel · 210 proj PA
wRC+†42
AVG/OBP/SLG.166 / .242 / .253
PA210
HR3
K%40
BB%8
ISO87
MLB%0%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -14.4 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-14BATRUN: +0.4 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)+0RUNFLD: -1.6 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)-2FLDPOS: -1.3 runs (Positional adjustment)-1POSREP: +4.5 runs (Replacement-level credit)+5REPTotal WAR: -1.10-1.1WAR
trajectory · projected WAR by year
-1.1-0.62728
Contract
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2030
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2035
First FA Year   2036
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2030
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2030
2029Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2030Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2031Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2032Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2033Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2034Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2035Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $0.0M $0.0M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202519 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans — 200182 39222 18680 81 214285280565 66330 349 262 16 — — — — — —
202519 ROKACL Cubs — 10089 24512 9202 103 270350416766 146328 209 344 52 — — — — — —
202620 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans — 431363 711439 591445 142 196316325641 129292 3314 295 30 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202519 A MLEMyrtle Beach Pelicans — 200188 30111 12970 81 160210191401 32327 486 192 16 — — — — — —
202519 ROK MLEACL Cubs — 10092 19412 6302 103 207270337607 130269 306 245 52 — — — — — —
202620 A MLEMyrtle Beach Pelicans — 431381 531026 411965 142 139232223455 84255 4510 212 30 — — — — — —
202519 A MLE2 teams — 300281 49523 171262 184 174227238465 64303 426 210 28 — — — — — —
202519 A RAW2 teams — 300271 63734 27882 184 232307325631 92330 299 289 28 — — — — — —
202620 A MLEMyrtle Beach Pelicans — 431381 531026 411965 142 139232223455 84260 4510 212 30 — — — — — —
202620 A RAWMyrtle Beach Pelicans — 431363 711439 591445 142 196316325641 129292 3314 295 30 — — — — — —
202519 A MLE2 teams — 300278 49523 171262 184 176227241468 65308 426 210 28 — — — — — —
202620 A MLEMyrtle Beach Pelicans — 431382 531026 411965 142 139232223454 84255 4510 212 30 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202519 A MLE2 teams — 300278 49523 171262 184 176227241468 65308 426 210 28 — — — — — —
202620 A MLEMyrtle Beach Pelicans — 431382 531026 411965 142 139232223454 84255 4510 212 30 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202721 MLB MLECHC 0% 541487 821438 452154 102 168244255499 87276 408 231 42 -37 +1 -4 -3 +12 -1.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202822 MLB MLECHC 34% 377339 601027 321463 71 176252279531 103279 398 243 51 -22 +1 -2 -2 +8 -1.8
202822 MLB CTXCHC 34% 130117 21412 11501 20 177254281535 104282 388 245 51 -8 +0 -1 -1 +3 -0.6
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 130117 21412 11501 20 179256282538 103288 388 245 37 -8 +0 -1 -1 +3 -0.6
/ 162G— A+C — 650585 10520510 552505 100 179256282538 103288 388 245 37 -38 +2 -4 -4 +14 -3.0
Career— MLE — 13181190 19330719 10755112 438 162238247485 85278 428 223 37 -36 +1 -4 -4 +13 -3.0
/ 162G— MLE — 650587 951539 532726 214 162238244482 82279 428 223 37 -40 +2 -4 -4 +14 -3.4

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans · 431 PAwOBA .289 → .212 (−77)K% 33.4% → 45.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA33.41%÷1.000×1.360——45.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA13.69%÷1.000×0.690—×1.0159.59%
HBP% /PA1.16%—×0.780—×1.0150.92%
Singles /BIP20.55%÷1.000×0.920×0.964×1.01518.49%
Doubles /BIP6.39%÷1.000×0.830×0.964×1.0155.19%
Triples /BIP1.37%÷1.000×0.910×0.964×1.0151.22%
Home runs /BIP4.11%÷1.000×0.800—×1.0153.34%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.964.

Result: wOBA .289 → .212; ISO .129 → .092; BABIP .292 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans · 200 PAwOBA .255 → .192 (−64)K% 34.0% → 48.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA34.00%÷0.956×1.360——48.37%
BB% (unintentional) /PA9.00%÷1.106×0.690—×1.0305.78%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.780—×1.0300.00%
Singles /BIP28.95%÷0.990×0.920×1.048×1.03029.06%
Doubles /BIP1.75%÷0.968×0.830×1.048×1.0301.62%
Triples /BIP1.75%÷1.150×0.910×1.048×1.0301.50%
Home runs /BIP1.75%÷0.925×0.800—×1.0301.56%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 98, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 91, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.048.

Result: wOBA .255 → .192; ISO .066 → .047; BABIP .330 → .327. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 ROKACL Cubs · 100 PAwOBA .335 → .245 (−90)K% 20.0% → 29.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA20.00%÷0.969×1.440——29.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA9.00%÷0.983×0.620—×0.9955.65%
HBP% /PA2.00%—×0.720—×0.9951.43%
Singles /BIP23.19%÷1.004×0.820×1.044×0.99519.67%
Doubles /BIP7.25%÷0.973×0.720×1.044×0.9955.57%
Triples /BIP1.45%÷1.089×0.720×1.044×0.9951.00%
Home runs /BIP2.90%÷0.868×0.780—×0.9952.59%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 74, 1B 101, 2B 95, 3B 118, K 94, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.044.

Result: wOBA .335 → .245; ISO .146 → .109; BABIP .328 → .269. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).