Carson Rucker
3B Lakeland Flying Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19 | ROKDET | 16 | .385/.438/.692 | 0 | 1 | 99 | — | .286/.375/.500 |
| 2025 | 20 | ADET | 429 | .235/.307/.295 | 1 | 11 | 31 | — | .182/.244/.228 |
| 2026 | 21 | A+/ADET | 395 | .252/.379/.431 | 15 | 17 | 64 | — | .186/.284/.314 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 22 | MLBDET | 505 | .196/.273/.289 | 8 | 10 | 61 | -0.3 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 23 | MLBDET | 119 | .197/.276/.297 | 2 | 2 | 66 | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ46% MLB | 24 | MLBDET | 187 | .201/.280/.306 | 4 | 4 | 70 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 35 / POW 20
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 18 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 41 | 33 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 242 | 390 | 364 | 754 | 121 | 304 | 22 | 15 | 352 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 16 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 385 | 438 | 692 | 1.130 | 308 | 625 | 31 | 0 | 469 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 429 | 387 | 91 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 30 | 104 | 10 | 11 | 3 | 235 | 307 | 295 | 601 | 59 | 317 | 24 | 7 | 278 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 71 | 60 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 217 | 338 | 433 | 771 | 217 | 250 | 28 | 14 | 346 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 324 | 265 | 69 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 50 | 113 | 5 | 16 | 2 | 260 | 388 | 430 | 818 | 170 | 400 | 35 | 15 | 365 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 41 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 200 | 317 | 314 | 631 | 114 | 248 | 32 | 10 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 16 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 286 | 375 | 500 | 875 | 214 | 468 | 44 | 0 | 314 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 429 | 395 | 72 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 142 | 10 | 11 | 3 | 182 | 244 | 228 | 471 | 46 | 277 | 33 | 5 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 71 | 63 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 25 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 175 | 268 | 333 | 601 | 159 | 225 | 35 | 10 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 324 | 281 | 53 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 34 | 154 | 5 | 16 | 2 | 189 | 287 | 310 | 597 | 121 | 347 | 48 | 10 | 263 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 41 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 200 | 317 | 314 | 631 | 114 | 286 | 32 | 10 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers | — | 41 | 33 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 242 | 390 | 364 | 754 | 121 | 304 | 22 | 15 | 352 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 16 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 286 | 375 | 500 | 875 | 214 | 571 | 44 | 0 | 314 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers | — | 16 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 385 | 438 | 692 | 1.130 | 308 | 625 | 31 | 0 | 469 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 429 | 395 | 72 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 142 | 10 | 11 | 3 | 182 | 244 | 228 | 471 | 46 | 280 | 33 | 5 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 429 | 387 | 91 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 30 | 104 | 10 | 11 | 3 | 235 | 307 | 295 | 601 | 59 | 317 | 24 | 7 | 278 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 395 | 343 | 63 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 42 | 179 | 6 | 17 | 2 | 184 | 284 | 309 | 593 | 125 | 331 | 45 | 11 | 263 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 395 | 325 | 82 | 9 | 2 | 15 | 60 | 133 | 6 | 17 | 2 | 252 | 379 | 431 | 809 | 178 | 370 | 34 | 15 | 362 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 41 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 200 | 317 | 314 | 631 | 114 | 248 | 32 | 10 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 16 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 286 | 375 | 500 | 875 | 214 | 468 | 44 | 0 | 314 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 429 | 394 | 72 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 142 | 10 | 11 | 3 | 183 | 244 | 228 | 472 | 46 | 277 | 33 | 5 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 395 | 344 | 63 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 42 | 179 | 6 | 17 | 2 | 183 | 284 | 308 | 592 | 125 | 325 | 45 | 11 | 263 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 16 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 286 | 375 | 500 | 875 | 214 | 468 | 44 | 0 | 314 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 429 | 394 | 72 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 142 | 10 | 11 | 3 | 183 | 244 | 228 | 472 | 46 | 277 | 33 | 5 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 395 | 344 | 63 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 42 | 179 | 6 | 17 | 2 | 183 | 284 | 308 | 592 | 125 | 325 | 45 | 11 | 263 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB MLE | DET | 0% | 505 | 452 | 88 | 13 | 2 | 8 | 41 | 182 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 196 | 273 | 289 | 562 | 93 | 302 | 36 | 8 | 258 | 61 | -24 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +11 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | DET | 34% | 346 | 309 | 62 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 29 | 121 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 201 | 279 | 304 | 582 | 103 | 302 | 35 | 8 | 266 | 66 | -14 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +7 | -0.4 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB MLE | DET | 46% | 406 | 363 | 74 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 34 | 139 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 205 | 283 | 314 | 596 | 109 | 302 | 34 | 8 | 272 | 70 | -14 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +9 | -0.3 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB MLE | DET | 52% | 439 | 393 | 82 | 13 | 2 | 9 | 37 | 147 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 207 | 285 | 320 | 606 | 113 | 302 | 33 | 8 | 275 | 73 | -14 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +10 | -0.2 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 54% | 456 | 409 | 85 | 13 | 2 | 10 | 38 | 151 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 209 | 287 | 324 | 611 | 115 | 301 | 33 | 8 | 278 | 74 | -14 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +10 | -0.2 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 54% | 462 | 414 | 87 | 14 | 2 | 10 | 39 | 151 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 210 | 288 | 326 | 613 | 116 | 299 | 33 | 8 | 278 | 75 | -14 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +10 | -0.2 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB MLE | DET | 54% | 461 | 413 | 86 | 14 | 2 | 10 | 39 | 151 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 208 | 286 | 321 | 606 | 113 | 298 | 33 | 8 | 276 | 73 | -15 | +1 | -1 | +2 | +10 | -0.3 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB MLE | DET | 58% | 452 | 405 | 83 | 13 | 2 | 9 | 38 | 150 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 205 | 283 | 314 | 597 | 109 | 296 | 33 | 8 | 272 | 70 | -16 | +1 | -1 | +2 | +10 | -0.6 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | DET | 34% | 119 | 106 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 197 | 276 | 297 | 572 | 99 | 297 | 35 | 8 | 262 | 66 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +3 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB CTX | DET | 46% | 187 | 166 | 34 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 64 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 201 | 280 | 306 | 586 | 105 | 297 | 34 | 9 | 268 | 70 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +4 | -0.2 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB CTX | DET | 52% | 227 | 203 | 41 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 76 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 204 | 282 | 313 | 595 | 109 | 297 | 33 | 8 | 271 | 73 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +5 | -0.1 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 54% | 247 | 221 | 45 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 82 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 205 | 284 | 317 | 600 | 111 | 296 | 33 | 9 | 273 | 74 | -8 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +5 | -0.1 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 54% | 251 | 225 | 46 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 82 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 206 | 284 | 318 | 602 | 112 | 295 | 33 | 8 | 274 | 75 | -8 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +5 | -0.1 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB CTX | DET | 54% | 250 | 224 | 45 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 82 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 204 | 282 | 313 | 595 | 109 | 293 | 33 | 8 | 271 | 73 | -8 | +0 | -0 | +1 | +5 | -0.2 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB CTX | DET | 58% | 261 | 234 | 47 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 86 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 202 | 279 | 307 | 586 | 105 | 291 | 33 | 8 | 267 | 70 | -9 | +0 | -1 | +1 | +6 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 1542 | 1379 | 279 | 42 | 7 | 31 | 130 | 514 | 20 | 27 | 6 | 202 | 281 | 310 | 591 | 108 | 295 | 33 | 8 | 270 | 66 | -52 | +3 | -1 | +6 | +33 | -1.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 581 | 118 | 18 | 3 | 13 | 55 | 217 | 8 | 11 | 3 | 203 | 281 | 312 | 593 | 108 | 297 | 33 | 8 | 270 | 66 | -22 | +1 | -1 | +2 | +14 | -0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 4113 | 3681 | 741 | 113 | 19 | 78 | 339 | 1427 | 64 | 90 | 18 | 201 | 280 | 306 | 586 | 105 | 302 | 35 | 8 | 266 | 66 | -112 | +7 | -2 | +12 | +70 | -2.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 582 | 117 | 18 | 3 | 12 | 54 | 226 | 10 | 14 | 3 | 201 | 280 | 304 | 584 | 103 | 303 | 35 | 8 | 266 | 66 | -22 | +1 | -0 | +2 | +14 | -0.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 324 PAwOBA .361 → .263 (−98)K% 34.9% → 47.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.88% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 47.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.43% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | — | 10.65% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.54% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 1.20% |
| Singles /BIP | 31.58% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.975 | — | 28.32% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.975 | — | 4.26% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.32% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.975 | — | 1.17% |
| Home runs /BIP | 7.24% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | — | 5.79% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.975.
Result: wOBA .361 → .263; ISO .170 → .119; BABIP .400 → .347. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 71 PAwOBA .337 → .264 (−73)K% 28.2% → 35.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.17% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 35.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 10.12% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.41% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 1.13% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.012 | 18.62% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.50% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | — | ×1.012 | 2.05% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 10.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 8.10% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .337 → .264; ISO .217 → .165; BABIP .250 → .225. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 429 PAwOBA .272 → .214 (−59)K% 24.2% → 33.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.24% | ÷0.998 | ×1.360 | — | — | 33.02% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.99% | ÷0.945 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 5.18% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.33% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 1.85% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.80% | ÷1.051 | ×0.920 | ×0.993 | ×1.015 | 22.74% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.95% | ÷0.971 | ×0.830 | ×0.993 | ×1.015 | 4.26% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.06% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×0.993 | ×1.015 | 0.85% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.35% | ÷0.864 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.33% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 110, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 100, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.993.
Result: wOBA .272 → .214; ISO .059 → .046; BABIP .317 → .277. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Tigers · 16 PAwOBA .457 → .314 (−143)K% 31.2% → 45.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.25% | ÷0.991 | ×1.440 | — | — | 45.39% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 0.00% | ÷1.040 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| HBP% /PA | 12.50% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 8.95% |
| Singles /BIP | 12.50% | ÷0.993 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.995 | 10.27% |
| Doubles /BIP | 50.00% | ÷0.981 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 36.52% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.947 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.952 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 99, 2B 96, 3B 89, K 98, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .457 → .314; ISO .308 → .205; BABIP .625 → .468. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Tigers · 41 PAwOBA .344 → .249 (−95)K% 22.0% → 32.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.95% | ÷0.972 | ×1.440 | — | — | 32.52% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.63% | ÷0.987 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 9.26% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.88% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 3.54% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷0.987 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.008 | 20.92% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.17% | ÷1.014 | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 2.98% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.17% | ÷0.924 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 3.54% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 97, 2B 103, 3B 130, K 94, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .344 → .249; ISO .121 → .092; BABIP .304 → .248. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).