Brayan Narvaez
P ACL Giants| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20 | ROKDSL Giants Bl… | 11 | 11 | 47 | 2.49 | 2.44 | 21.5% | 6.5% | — | K 14.6% · BB 8.1% · FIP 3.29 |
| 2026 | 21 | ROKSF | 19 | 1 | 39 | 4.89 | 3.72 | 23.0% | 6.8% | — | K 15.6% · BB 8.5% · FIP 5.25 |
| 2027PROJ | 22 | MLBSF | — | — | 0 | 4.66 | 4.66 | 18.7% | 8.9% | — | |
| 2028PROJ49% MLB | 23 | MLBSF | 21 | 0 | 22 | 4.41 | 4.34 | 20.4% | 8.6% | 0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ70% MLB | 24 | MLBSF | 30 | 0 | 31 | 4.29 | 4.21 | 21.5% | 8.4% | 0.1 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Giants Orange | 6 | 6 | 24 | 98 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 100% | 4.1 | 13.2% | 5.1% | 8.1% | 3.0% | 3.70 | 4.29 | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Giants Orange | 6 | 6 | 24 | 98 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 100% | 4.1 | 19.4% | 4.1% | 15.3% | 2.0% | 3.70 | 3.10 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Giants Black | 12 | 11 | 44 | 179 | 45 | 10 | 2 | 92% | 3.6 | 17.1% | 7.0% | 10.1% | 1.4% | 3.92 | 3.33 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Giants Black | 12 | 11 | 44 | 179 | 45 | 10 | 2 | 92% | 3.6 | 17.1% | 7.0% | 10.1% | 1.4% | 3.92 | 3.33 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Giants Black | 12 | 11 | 44 | 179 | 45 | 10 | 2 | 92% | 3.6 | 25.1% | 5.6% | 19.6% | 1.1% | 3.92 | 2.32 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Giants Black | 11 | 11 | 47 | 186 | 40 | 12 | 1 | 100% | 4.3 | 14.6% | 8.1% | 6.6% | 0.7% | 2.49 | 3.29 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Giants Black | 11 | 11 | 47 | 186 | 40 | 12 | 1 | 100% | 4.3 | 14.6% | 8.1% | 6.6% | 0.7% | 2.49 | 3.29 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL Giants Black | 11 | 11 | 47 | 186 | 40 | 12 | 1 | 100% | 4.3 | 21.5% | 6.5% | 15.1% | 0.5% | 2.49 | 2.44 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Giants | 19 | 1 | 39 | 161 | 37 | 11 | 5 | 5% | 2.0 | 15.6% | 8.5% | 7.1% | 4.3% | 4.89 | 5.25 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Giants | 19 | 1 | 39 | 161 | 37 | 11 | 5 | 5% | 2.0 | 15.6% | 8.5% | 7.1% | 4.3% | 4.89 | 5.25 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK RAW | ACL Giants | 19 | 1 | 39 | 161 | 37 | 11 | 5 | 5% | 2.0 | 23.0% | 6.8% | 16.1% | 3.1% | 4.89 | 3.72 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB | SF | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.7% | 8.9% | 9.8% | 3.0% | 4.66 | 4.66 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | SF | 42 | 0 | 45 | 188 | 38 | 16 | 6 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.4% | 8.6% | 11.9% | 2.9% | 4.53 | 4.46 | +0.0 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB MLE | SF | 42 | 0 | 45 | 188 | 40 | 16 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.5% | 8.4% | 13.1% | 2.9% | 4.41 | 4.33 | +0.1 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB MLE | SF | 38 | 0 | 40 | 171 | 38 | 14 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.0% | 8.3% | 13.7% | 2.9% | 4.33 | 4.27 | +0.1 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB MLE | SF | 39 | 0 | 41 | 171 | 38 | 14 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.3% | 8.3% | 14.0% | 2.9% | 4.28 | 4.25 | +0.1 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB MLE | SF | 38 | 0 | 40 | 167 | 37 | 14 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.2% | 8.4% | 13.9% | 3.0% | 4.28 | 4.29 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | SF | 21 | 0 | 22 | 93 | 19 | 8 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.4% | 8.6% | 11.9% | 2.7% | 4.41 | 4.34 | +0.0 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB CTX | SF | 30 | 0 | 31 | 131 | 28 | 11 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.5% | 8.4% | 13.1% | 2.7% | 4.29 | 4.21 | +0.1 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB CTX | SF | 31 | 0 | 33 | 139 | 31 | 12 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.0% | 8.3% | 13.7% | 2.7% | 4.21 | 4.15 | +0.1 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB CTX | SF | 33 | 0 | 35 | 148 | 33 | 12 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.3% | 8.3% | 14.0% | 2.7% | 4.16 | 4.13 | +0.1 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB CTX | SF | 34 | 0 | 36 | 152 | 34 | 13 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.2% | 8.4% | 13.9% | 2.7% | 4.16 | 4.17 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 150 | 0 | 157 | 663 | 145 | 56 | 18 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.8% | 8.4% | 13.4% | 2.7% | 4.23 | 3.81 | +1.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 185 | 71 | 23 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.8% | 8.4% | 13.4% | 2.7% | 4.23 | 3.81 | +1.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 48 | 29 | 154 | 624 | 96 | 46 | 14 | 60% | 3.2 | 15.4% | 7.4% | 8.0% | 2.2% | 3.69 | 3.96 | +2.7 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 62 | 38 | 200 | 812 | 125 | 60 | 18 | 60% | 3.2 | 15.4% | 7.4% | 8.0% | 2.2% | 3.69 | 3.96 | +2.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKACL Giants · 39 IPFIP 3.73 → 5.25 (+1.52)K% 23.0% → 15.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.98% | — | ×0.680 | 15.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.83% | — | ×1.250 | 8.54% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.11% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 4.35% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.73 → 5.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKDSL Giants Black · 47 IPFIP 2.40 → 3.29 (+0.89)K% 21.5% → 14.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.51% | — | ×0.680 | 14.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.45% | — | ×1.250 | 8.06% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.54% | ÷1.022 | ×1.400 | 0.74% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).
Result: FIP 2.40 → 3.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKDSL Giants Black · 44 IPFIP 2.30 → 3.33 (+1.03)K% 25.1% → 17.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.14% | — | ×0.680 | 17.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.59% | — | ×1.250 | 6.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.12% | ÷1.092 | ×1.400 | 1.43% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).
Result: FIP 2.30 → 3.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Giants Orange · 24 IPFIP 3.10 → 4.29 (+1.19)K% 19.4% → 13.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.39% | — | ×0.680 | 13.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.08% | — | ×1.250 | 5.10% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.04% | ÷0.949 | ×1.400 | 3.01% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 3.10 → 4.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.3 | 42 | 21.1% | 8.5% | 1.14 | 4.42 |
| Ian Krol ('21) | 1.0 | 42 | 21.2% | 8.8% | 1.25 | 4.49 |
| Tyler Walker ('10) | 1.5 | 50 | 18.9% | 8.5% | 1.11 | 4.23 |
| Jacob Barnes ('25) | 1.7 | 48 | 22.0% | 9.2% | 1.15 | 4.79 |
| Dave Baldwin ('66-'73, 2 WAR*) | 1.1 | 56 | 22.2%* | 9.2%* | 0.96* | 3.97* |
| Bill Pleis ('61-'66, -0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 56 | 19.7%* | 9.8%* | 1.15* | 4.53* |
| Kevin Hickey ('81-'91, 0 WAR*) | 1.2 | 47 | 17.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.10* | 4.27* |