Jervis Alfaro
P Lake County Captains| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20 | MIX2 levels | 17 | 12 | 66 | 3.39 | 2.21 | 24.3% | 6.1% | — | K 16.9% · BB 7.4% · FIP 3.21 |
| 2025 | 21 | ALynchburg Hil… | 20 | 16 | 89 | 3.63 | 2.73 | 18.7% | 6.2% | — | K 13.8% · BB 7.3% · FIP 3.33 |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 21 | 8 | 69 | 5.77 | 3.87 | 20.4% | 9.6% | — | K 15.3% · BB 11.1% · FIP 4.78 |
| 2027PROJ | 23 | MLBCLE | — | — | 0 | 5.27 | 5.27 | 12.3% | 10.3% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 24 | MLBCLE | 4 | 4 | 26 | 5.07 | 5.01 | 14.7% | 9.8% | 0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ66% MLB | 25 | MLBCLE | 6 | 6 | 37 | 4.92 | 4.85 | 16.1% | 9.5% | 0.2 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Guardians Red | 9 | 9 | 41 | 165 | 32 | 12 | 0 | 100% | 4.6 | 13.2% | 9.1% | 4.1% | 0.0% | 1.74 | 3.14 | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Guardians Red | 9 | 9 | 41 | 165 | 32 | 12 | 0 | 100% | 4.6 | 19.4% | 7.3% | 12.1% | 0.0% | 1.74 | 2.42 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 17 | 12 | 66 | 280 | 68 | 17 | 2 | 71% | 3.9 | 16.9% | 7.4% | 9.6% | 1.1% | 3.39 | 3.21 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 17 | 12 | 66 | 280 | 68 | 17 | 2 | 71% | 3.9 | 16.9% | 7.4% | 9.6% | 1.1% | 3.39 | 3.21 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 17 | 12 | 66 | 280 | 68 | 17 | 2 | 71% | 3.9 | 24.3% | 6.1% | 18.2% | 0.7% | 3.39 | 2.21 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | 20 | 16 | 89 | 386 | 72 | 24 | 3 | 80% | 4.5 | 13.8% | 7.3% | 6.5% | 0.9% | 3.63 | 3.33 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | 20 | 16 | 89 | 386 | 72 | 24 | 3 | 80% | 4.5 | 13.8% | 7.3% | 6.5% | 0.9% | 3.63 | 3.33 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A RAW | Lynchburg Hillcats | 20 | 16 | 89 | 386 | 72 | 24 | 3 | 80% | 4.5 | 18.7% | 6.2% | 12.4% | 0.8% | 3.63 | 2.73 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 8 | 69 | 313 | 64 | 30 | 7 | 38% | 3.3 | 15.3% | 11.1% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 5.77 | 4.78 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 8 | 69 | 313 | 64 | 30 | 7 | 38% | 3.3 | 15.3% | 11.1% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 5.77 | 4.78 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 8 | 69 | 313 | 64 | 30 | 7 | 38% | 3.3 | 20.4% | 9.6% | 10.9% | 2.2% | 5.77 | 3.87 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB | CLE | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.3% | 10.3% | 2.0% | 2.8% | 5.27 | 5.27 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | CLE | 10 | 10 | 62 | 261 | 38 | 26 | 7 | 100% | 6.2 | 14.7% | 9.8% | 4.9% | 2.8% | 5.07 | 5.01 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | CLE | 9 | 9 | 56 | 235 | 38 | 22 | 7 | 100% | 6.2 | 16.1% | 9.5% | 6.6% | 2.8% | 4.92 | 4.85 | +0.3 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | CLE | 9 | 9 | 54 | 230 | 39 | 22 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 16.9% | 9.4% | 7.5% | 2.8% | 4.82 | 4.78 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | CLE | 8 | 8 | 53 | 222 | 38 | 21 | 6 | 100% | 6.6 | 17.0% | 9.4% | 7.6% | 2.8% | 4.80 | 4.80 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | CLE | 9 | 9 | 54 | 228 | 43 | 20 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 18.9% | 8.8% | 10.1% | 2.9% | 4.69 | 4.61 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | CLE | 8 | 8 | 50 | 212 | 39 | 19 | 7 | 100% | 6.3 | 18.6% | 9.0% | 9.6% | 3.1% | 4.72 | 4.75 | +0.4 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB MLE | CLE | 7 | 7 | 45 | 191 | 35 | 18 | 6 | 100% | 6.5 | 18.3% | 9.3% | 9.0% | 3.3% | 4.84 | 4.92 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | CLE | 4 | 4 | 26 | 110 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 100% | 6.5 | 14.7% | 9.8% | 4.9% | 2.8% | 5.07 | 5.01 | +0.1 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | CLE | 6 | 6 | 37 | 156 | 25 | 15 | 4 | 100% | 6.2 | 16.1% | 9.5% | 6.6% | 2.8% | 4.92 | 4.85 | +0.2 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | CLE | 7 | 7 | 43 | 182 | 31 | 17 | 5 | 100% | 6.1 | 16.9% | 9.4% | 7.5% | 2.8% | 4.82 | 4.78 | +0.3 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | CLE | 7 | 7 | 45 | 190 | 32 | 18 | 5 | 100% | 6.4 | 17.0% | 9.4% | 7.6% | 2.8% | 4.80 | 4.80 | +0.3 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | CLE | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 38 | 18 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 18.9% | 8.8% | 10.1% | 2.9% | 4.69 | 4.61 | +0.4 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | CLE | 7 | 7 | 46 | 194 | 36 | 18 | 6 | 100% | 6.6 | 18.6% | 9.0% | 9.6% | 3.1% | 4.72 | 4.75 | +0.3 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB CTX | CLE | 7 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 32 | 17 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 18.3% | 9.3% | 9.0% | 3.3% | 4.84 | 4.92 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 46 | 46 | 287 | 1210 | 211 | 112 | 36 | 100% | 6.2 | 17.4% | 9.3% | 8.1% | 2.9% | 4.81 | 4.42 | +3.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 32 | 32 | 200 | 844 | 147 | 78 | 25 | 100% | 6.2 | 17.4% | 9.3% | 8.1% | 2.9% | 4.81 | 4.42 | +2.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 67 | 45 | 266 | 1144 | 170 | 99 | 15 | 67% | 4.0 | 14.9% | 8.6% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 3.83 | 3.67 | +2.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 50 | 34 | 200 | 861 | 128 | 74 | 11 | 67% | 4.0 | 14.9% | 8.6% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 3.83 | 3.67 | +1.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Lake County Captains · 34 IPFIP 4.81 → 5.61 (+0.80)K% 12.7% → 9.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.73% | — | ×0.770 | 9.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.52% | — | ×1.150 | 13.24% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.42% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 3.03% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.81 → 5.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AHill City Howlers · 35 IPFIP 2.70 → 3.84 (+1.14)K% 29.1% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.05% | — | ×0.740 | 21.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.43% | — | ×1.180 | 8.77% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.03% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 2.64% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.70 → 3.84, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ALynchburg Hillcats · 89 IPFIP 2.74 → 3.33 (+0.59)K% 18.7% → 13.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.65% | — | ×0.740 | 13.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.22% | — | ×1.180 | 7.34% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.78% | ÷1.184 | ×1.300 | 0.85% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 137).
Result: FIP 2.74 → 3.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKACL Guardians · 43 IPFIP 1.37 → 2.25 (+0.88)K% 27.3% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.27% | — | ×0.680 | 18.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.55% | — | ×1.250 | 5.68% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.984 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 1.37 → 2.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ALynchburg Hillcats · 24 IPFIP 3.63 → 4.82 (+1.19)K% 19.2% → 14.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.23% | — | ×0.740 | 14.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.65% | — | ×1.180 | 10.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.92% | ÷0.844 | ×1.300 | 2.96% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 3.63 → 4.82, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Guardians Red · 41 IPFIP 2.38 → 3.14 (+0.75)K% 19.4% → 13.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.39% | — | ×0.680 | 13.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.27% | — | ×1.250 | 9.09% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷2.400 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 380).
Result: FIP 2.38 → 3.14, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.2 | 54 | 16.5% | 9.5% | 1.12 | 4.90 |
| Vic Darensbourg ('05) | 1.5 | 50 | 17.0% | 9.3% | 1.01 | 4.96 |
| Tom Martin ('07) | 1.6 | 53 | 15.8% | 10.1% | 1.02 | 4.92 |
| Vinnie Chulk ('12) | 1.4 | 57 | 16.0% | 9.0% | 0.98 | 4.51 |
| Kevin Hickey ('81-'91, 0 WAR*) | 1.2 | 47 | 17.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.10* | 4.27* |
| Dave Leiper ('84-'96, 0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 46 | 15.6%* | 9.1%* | 0.94* | 4.28* |
| Mike Munoz ('89-'00, 1 WAR*) | 1.8 | 46 | 17.6%* | 10.2%* | 0.93* | 4.46* |