Walker Martin

3B Eugene Emeralds
Age 23 L/R 6'3" / 215 lbs A+ HR -15%H -3% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2036
Overview
A+PROSPECTMiLBFA 2037
MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202420A/ROKSF312.218/.391/.3628631—.120/.250/.188
202521A/INTL2 orgs543.233/.349/.374121347—.166/.256/.249
202622A+SF449.232/.323/.405182051—.179/.251/.302
2027PROJMLE23MLBSF1.165/.247/.2660049-0.0
2028PROJ30% MLB24MLBSF129.171/.252/.2773354-0.4
Next 2 projected WAR -0.4Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2036Service0.0First FA2037
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029Ext$0.0M2030Ext$0.0M2031Ext$0.9M2032Ext$0.9M2033Ext$0.9M2034Ext$3M+2
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2026 A+
ISO61
Speed52
wRC+42
BB%42
Chase%42
wOBA36
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.8, comp-based) · star 1% · didn't stick 94%
CompsMichel Triana (age 23) · Nick Decker (age 23) · Hudson Head (age 23)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONstats below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+†49
AVG/OBP/SLG.165 / .247 / .266
PA1
HR0
K%41
BB%9
BABIP270
ISO101
MLB%0%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -12.7 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-13BATRUN: +0.4 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)+0RUNFLD: +0.0 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)+0FLDPOS: +0.7 runs (Positional adjustment)+1POSREP: +4.5 runs (Replacement-level credit)+5REPTotal WAR: -0.40-0.4WAR
trajectory · projected WAR by year
-0.4-0.42728
Tools · ContractCON 30 / POW 40
Toolsscout grade
CONTACT30
scouting grade only
POWER40
scouting grade only
EYE55
scouting grade only
SPEED45
scouting grade only
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2031
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2036
First FA Year   2037
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2031
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2031
2029Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2030Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2031Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2032Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2033Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2034Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2035Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2036Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $0.0M $0.0M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202420 ASan Jose Giants — 12399 20322 21573 20 202358333691 131450 4617 324 20 — — — — — —
202420 ROKACL Giants — 189144 33406 40715 41 229413382795 153403 3821 370 38 — — — — — —
202521 ASan Jose Giants — 482406 9519312 691376 134 234353384738 150322 2814 336 43 — — — — — —
202521 INTLScottsdale Scorpions — 6154 12210 6261 00 222311296608 74429 4310 283 78 — — — — — —
202622 A+Eugene Emeralds — 449393 9114018 481525 203 232323405727 173324 3411 325 51 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202420 A MLESan Jose Giants — 123105 10111 15813 20 95228152380 57428 6612 198 20 — — — — — —
202420 ROK MLEACL Giants — 189161 22303 231035 41 137265211476 75327 5412 224 38 — — — — — —
202521 A MLESan Jose Giants — 482429 711236 461946 134 166256249505 84281 4010 232 43 — — — — — —
202622 A+ MLEEugene Emeralds — 449407 7311013 342055 203 179251302553 123304 468 243 51 — — — — — —
202420 ROK MLE2 teams — 312266 32414 381848 61 120250188438 68359 5912 214 31 — — — — — —
202420 ROK RAW2 teams — 312243 53728 611288 61 218391362753 144421 4120 352 31 — — — — — —
202521 A MLE2 teams — 543483 801437 522187 134 166256251507 85282 4010 232 43 — — — — — —
202521 A RAW2 teams — 543460 10721412 751637 134 233349374723 141332 3014 330 43 — — — — — —
202622 A+ MLEEugene Emeralds — 449407 7311013 342055 203 179251302553 123314 468 243 51 — — — — — —
202622 A+ RAWEugene Emeralds — 449393 9114018 481525 203 232323405727 173324 3411 325 51 — — — — — —
202420 ROK MLE2 teams — 312263 32414 381848 61 122250190440 68367 5912 214 31 — — — — — —
202521 A MLE2 teams — 543479 801437 522187 134 167256253509 86281 4010 232 43 — — — — — —
202622 A+ MLEEugene Emeralds — 449407 7311013 342055 203 179251302553 123304 468 243 51 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202420 ROK MLE2 teams — 312263 32414 381848 61 122250190440 68367 5912 214 31 — — — — — —
202521 A MLE2 teams — 543479 801437 522187 134 167256253509 86281 4010 232 43 — — — — — —
202622 A+ MLEEugene Emeralds — 449407 7311013 342055 203 179251302553 123304 468 243 51 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202723 MLB MLESF 0% 559500 8514212 482286 112 169250275524 106274 419 241 49 -34 +1 +0 +2 +12 -0.4
▸ 2027 — real world (MLB)
202723 MLB CTXSF 0% 11 0000 000 00 165247266512 100270 00 236 49 -0 +0 +0 +0 +0 -0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202824 MLB MLESF 30% 426382 6611110 371694 82 174255286542 112276 409 248 54 -23 +1 +0 +2 +9 -1.2
202824 MLB CTXSF 30% 129116 19303 11511 31 171252277529 106272 409 243 54 -7 +0 +0 +0 +3 -0.4
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 129116 19303 11511 31 164242267509 103254 409 243 46 -7 +0 +0 +0 +3 -0.4
/ 162G— A+C — 650584 9615015 552575 155 164242267509 103256 408 243 46 -35 +1 +0 +2 +14 -1.8
Career— MLE — 19401726 28245638 17986226 5111 163252262515 99293 449 236 46 -36 +1 +0 +2 +14 -1.9
/ 162G— MLE — 650578 9515213 602899 174 164253265518 100295 449 236 46 -37 +1 +0 +2 +14 -1.9

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 A+Eugene Emeralds · 449 PAwOBA .317 → .243 (−75)K% 33.9% → 45.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA33.85%÷1.000×1.350——45.70%
BB% (unintentional) /PA10.47%÷1.000×0.710—×1.0127.52%
HBP% /PA1.11%—×0.810—×1.0120.91%
Singles /BIP24.48%÷1.000×0.910×1.050×1.01223.67%
Doubles /BIP5.81%÷1.000×0.830×1.050×1.0125.12%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.820×1.050×1.0120.00%
Home runs /BIP7.47%÷1.000×0.830—×1.0126.27%

Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .317 → .243; ISO .173 → .125; BABIP .324 → .304. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 ASan Jose Giants · 482 PAwOBA .329 → .232 (−97)K% 28.4% → 40.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA28.42%÷0.962×1.360——40.20%
BB% (unintentional) /PA14.32%÷1.055×0.690—×1.0159.51%
HBP% /PA1.24%—×0.780—×1.0150.99%
Singles /BIP22.68%÷1.007×0.920×1.001×1.01521.05%
Doubles /BIP7.06%÷1.138×0.830×1.001×1.0155.23%
Triples /BIP1.12%÷0.902×0.910×1.001×1.0151.14%
Home runs /BIP4.46%÷1.358×0.800—×1.0152.67%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 172, 1B 101, 2B 128, 3B 80, K 92, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.001.

Result: wOBA .329 → .232; ISO .150 → .091; BABIP .322 → .281. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 ROKACL Giants · 189 PAwOBA .360 → .224 (−137)K% 37.6% → 54.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA37.57%÷0.997×1.440——54.27%
BB% (unintentional) /PA20.63%÷1.062×0.620—×0.99511.99%
HBP% /PA2.65%—×0.720—×0.9951.90%
Singles /BIP31.51%÷1.003×0.820×1.034×0.99526.50%
Doubles /BIP5.48%÷0.927×0.720×1.034×0.9954.38%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.900×0.720×1.034×0.9950.00%
Home runs /BIP8.22%÷1.178×0.780—×0.9955.42%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 136, 1B 101, 2B 85, 3B 80, K 99, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.034.

Result: wOBA .360 → .224; ISO .153 → .086; BABIP .403 → .327. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 ASan Jose Giants · 123 PAwOBA .317 → .198 (−119)K% 46.3% → 65.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA46.34%÷0.957×1.360——65.88%
BB% (unintentional) /PA17.07%÷0.966×0.690—×1.03012.56%
HBP% /PA2.44%—×0.780—×1.0301.96%
Singles /BIP30.95%÷0.961×0.920—×1.03030.51%
Doubles /BIP7.14%÷1.012×0.830—×1.0306.03%
Triples /BIP4.76%÷1.000×0.910—×1.0304.46%
Home runs /BIP4.76%÷0.959×0.800—×1.0304.09%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 92, 1B 92, 2B 102, 3B 100, K 91, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .317 → .198; ISO .131 → .066; BABIP .450 → .428. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .