Beau Ankeney
1B Lakeland Flying Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22 | ADET | 20 | .267/.400/.400 | 0 | 0 | 75 | — | .235/.350/.353 |
| 2026 | 23 | A+/ADET | 483 | .281/.365/.526 | 24 | 4 | 81 | — | .211/.280/.387 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 24 | MLBDET | 380 | .218/.284/.385 | 13 | 5 | 87 | -0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 25 | MLBDET | 78 | .216/.283/.377 | 3 | 1 | 88 | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 26 | MLBDET | 135 | .217/.284/.378 | 4 | 2 | 89 | -0.1 |
Tools · ContractCON 21 / POW 53
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 20 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 267 | 400 | 400 | 800 | 133 | 444 | 30 | 15 | 358 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 115 | 97 | 28 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 16 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 289 | 395 | 649 | 1.044 | 361 | 311 | 24 | 14 | 442 | 123 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 368 | 323 | 90 | 17 | 3 | 15 | 31 | 105 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 279 | 356 | 489 | 845 | 211 | 364 | 29 | 8 | 369 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 20 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 235 | 350 | 353 | 703 | 118 | 380 | 40 | 10 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 115 | 102 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 36 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 235 | 316 | 510 | 826 | 275 | 279 | 31 | 10 | 350 | 123 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 368 | 335 | 68 | 12 | 2 | 11 | 21 | 143 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 203 | 268 | 349 | 618 | 146 | 303 | 39 | 6 | 268 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 20 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 235 | 350 | 353 | 703 | 118 | 444 | 40 | 10 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 20 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 267 | 400 | 400 | 800 | 133 | 444 | 30 | 15 | 358 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 483 | 437 | 92 | 17 | 3 | 18 | 32 | 178 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 211 | 280 | 387 | 666 | 176 | 302 | 37 | 7 | 288 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 483 | 420 | 118 | 23 | 4 | 24 | 47 | 133 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 281 | 365 | 526 | 892 | 245 | 352 | 28 | 10 | 387 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 20 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 235 | 350 | 353 | 703 | 118 | 380 | 40 | 10 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 483 | 438 | 92 | 17 | 3 | 18 | 32 | 178 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 210 | 280 | 386 | 666 | 176 | 297 | 37 | 7 | 288 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 20 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 235 | 350 | 353 | 703 | 118 | 380 | 40 | 10 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 483 | 438 | 92 | 17 | 3 | 18 | 32 | 178 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 210 | 280 | 386 | 666 | 176 | 297 | 37 | 7 | 288 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB MLE | DET | 0% | 380 | 345 | 75 | 14 | 2 | 13 | 27 | 111 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 218 | 284 | 385 | 669 | 167 | 278 | 29 | 7 | 297 | 87 | -6 | +1 | +0 | -7 | +8 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | DET | 30% | 260 | 237 | 51 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 18 | 75 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 220 | 287 | 388 | 674 | 168 | 279 | 29 | 7 | 299 | 88 | -4 | +0 | +0 | -5 | +6 | -0.2 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 44% | 305 | 276 | 62 | 11 | 2 | 11 | 22 | 87 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 221 | 288 | 388 | 676 | 167 | 279 | 29 | 7 | 300 | 89 | -4 | +0 | +0 | -5 | +7 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | DET | 30% | 78 | 71 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 23 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 216 | 283 | 377 | 660 | 162 | 274 | 29 | 8 | 293 | 88 | -1 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +2 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 44% | 135 | 122 | 26 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 217 | 284 | 378 | 662 | 161 | 274 | 29 | 7 | 294 | 89 | -2 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +3 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 213 | 193 | 41 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 16 | 62 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 212 | 283 | 373 | 656 | 161 | 272 | 29 | 8 | 294 | 85 | -3 | +1 | +0 | -4 | +5 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 589 | 124 | 24 | 3 | 21 | 49 | 189 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 211 | 281 | 368 | 650 | 158 | 270 | 29 | 8 | 294 | 85 | -9 | +2 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -0.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1278 | 1157 | 251 | 45 | 8 | 45 | 89 | 410 | 21 | 14 | 4 | 217 | 285 | 386 | 671 | 169 | 290 | 32 | 7 | 294 | 85 | -11 | +1 | +0 | -14 | +17 | -0.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 588 | 128 | 23 | 4 | 23 | 45 | 209 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 218 | 286 | 388 | 673 | 170 | 292 | 32 | 7 | 294 | 85 | -9 | +1 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -0.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 368 PAwOBA .361 → .268 (−94)K% 28.5% → 38.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.53% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 38.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.15% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 5.57% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.45% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 1.89% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.23% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.951 | ×0.990 | 21.84% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.80% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.951 | ×0.990 | 6.09% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.38% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.951 | ×0.990 | 1.18% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 5.45% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.951.
Result: wOBA .361 → .268; ISO .211 → .152; BABIP .364 → .303. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 115 PAwOBA .433 → .350 (−83)K% 24.3% → 30.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.35% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 30.92% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.91% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 9.86% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.87% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 0.69% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.39% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.998 | 16.77% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.70% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.050 | ×0.998 | 7.38% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.45% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.050 | ×0.998 | 1.29% |
| Home runs /BIP | 13.04% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 10.41% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .433 → .350; ISO .361 → .286; BABIP .311 → .279. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 20 PAwOBA .350 → .279 (−72)K% 30.0% → 40.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.00% | ÷0.998 | ×1.360 | — | — | 40.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.00% | ÷0.945 | ×0.690 | — | — | 10.95% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 3.90% |
| Singles /BIP | 33.33% | ÷1.051 | ×0.920 | — | — | 29.17% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.971 | ×0.830 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 11.11% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | — | — | 8.79% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.864 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 110, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 100, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .350 → .279; ISO .133 → .104; BABIP .444 → .380. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).