Kyle Manzardo
1B Cleveland Guardians| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | AAACLE | 364 | .267/.404/.548 | 20 | 3 | 107 | — | .218/.320/.413 |
| 2024 | 24 | MLBCLE | 156 | .234/.284/.421 | 5 | 0 | 94 | -0.7 | |
| 2025 | 25 | MLBCLE | 531 | .234/.316/.455 | 27 | 2 | 113 | 0.7 | |
| 2026 | 26 | AAACLE | 165 | .283/.358/.469 | 5 | 1 | 80 | — | .240/.296/.387 |
| 2026 | 26 | MLBCLE | 356 | .215/.308/.378 | 13 | 0 | 95 | -0.4 | |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBCLE | 391 | .213/.295/.388 | 15 | 2 | 92 | -0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ65% MLB | 28 | MLBCLE | 289 | .211/.293/.383 | 11 | 0 | 90 | -0.2 |
Tools · Splits · ContractCON 40 / POW 55
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 21 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 50 | 43 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 349 | 440 | 605 | 1.045 | 256 | 371 | 12 | 8 | 456 | 110 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | AA | Montgomery Biscuits | — | 122 | 99 | 32 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 323 | 422 | 576 | 998 | 253 | 333 | 16 | 11 | 415 | 145 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 275 | 225 | 74 | 16 | 1 | 17 | 45 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 329 | 443 | 636 | 1.078 | 307 | 343 | 17 | 16 | 458 | 132 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AAA | Columbus Clippers | — | 405 | 343 | 83 | 27 | 1 | 17 | 54 | 79 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 242 | 348 | 475 | 824 | 233 | 261 | 20 | 13 | 359 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | INTL | Peoria Javelinas | — | 103 | 92 | 25 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 272 | 343 | 565 | 908 | 293 | 292 | 21 | 9 | 389 | 149 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MLB | Cleveland Guardians | — | 156 | 145 | 34 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 41 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 234 | 284 | 421 | 705 | 186 | 290 | 26 | 6 | 309 | 94 | -1 | +0 | -0 | -9 | +3 | -0.7 |
| 2024 | 24 | AAA | Columbus Clippers | — | 364 | 292 | 78 | 20 | 1 | 20 | 61 | 67 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 267 | 404 | 548 | 952 | 281 | 276 | 18 | 17 | 410 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MLB | Cleveland Guardians | — | 531 | 470 | 110 | 19 | 2 | 27 | 48 | 135 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 234 | 316 | 455 | 771 | 221 | 265 | 25 | 9 | 338 | 113 | +8 | +0 | -4 | -9 | +12 | 0.7 |
| 2026 | 26 | MLB | Cleveland Guardians | — | 356 | 312 | 67 | 10 | 1 | 13 | 36 | 114 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 215 | 308 | 378 | 686 | 163 | 289 | 32 | 10 | 309 | 95 | -2 | +0 | +0 | -9 | +8 | -0.4 |
| 2026 | 26 | AAA | Columbus Clippers | — | 165 | 145 | 41 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 17 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 283 | 358 | 469 | 827 | 186 | 350 | 24 | 10 | 360 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | — | 1043 | 927 | 211 | 41 | 3 | 45 | 93 | 290 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 228 | 308 | 424 | 732 | 196 | 277 | 28 | 9 | 324 | 105 | +6 | +0 | -4 | -28 | +23 | -0.3 | ||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 50 | 45 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 267 | 340 | 489 | 829 | 222 | 284 | 18 | 4 | 331 | 110 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | AA MLE | Montgomery Biscuits | — | 122 | 104 | 31 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 298 | 371 | 529 | 900 | 231 | 292 | 18 | 7 | 382 | 145 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 275 | 244 | 65 | 12 | 1 | 16 | 26 | 60 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 266 | 339 | 520 | 860 | 254 | 279 | 22 | 9 | 363 | 132 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 405 | 358 | 72 | 22 | 1 | 12 | 39 | 94 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 201 | 283 | 369 | 652 | 168 | 231 | 23 | 10 | 290 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MLB MLE | Cleveland Guardians | — | 156 | 145 | 34 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 41 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 234 | 284 | 421 | 705 | 186 | 290 | 26 | 6 | 307 | 94 | -1 | +0 | -0 | -9 | +3 | -0.7 |
| 2024 | 24 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 364 | 312 | 68 | 17 | 1 | 14 | 41 | 86 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 218 | 320 | 413 | 734 | 196 | 246 | 24 | 11 | 326 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MLB MLE | Cleveland Guardians | — | 531 | 472 | 110 | 19 | 2 | 27 | 46 | 135 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 233 | 312 | 453 | 765 | 220 | 265 | 25 | 9 | 335 | 113 | +8 | +0 | -4 | -9 | +12 | 0.7 |
| 2026 | 26 | MLB MLE | Cleveland Guardians | — | 356 | 312 | 67 | 10 | 1 | 13 | 36 | 114 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 215 | 308 | 378 | 686 | 163 | 289 | 32 | 10 | 309 | 95 | -2 | +0 | +0 | -9 | +8 | -0.4 |
| 2026 | 26 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 165 | 150 | 36 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 48 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 240 | 296 | 387 | 683 | 147 | 299 | 29 | 7 | 286 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 50 | 45 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 267 | 340 | 489 | 829 | 222 | 294 | 18 | 4 | 331 | 110 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | — | 50 | 43 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 349 | 440 | 605 | 1.045 | 256 | 371 | 12 | 8 | 456 | 110 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 397 | 347 | 95 | 21 | 1 | 20 | 36 | 83 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 274 | 349 | 513 | 862 | 239 | 295 | 21 | 9 | 369 | 136 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 397 | 324 | 106 | 26 | 1 | 22 | 59 | 65 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 327 | 437 | 617 | 1.054 | 290 | 340 | 16 | 15 | 445 | 136 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 508 | 449 | 91 | 28 | 1 | 15 | 49 | 118 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 203 | 285 | 370 | 655 | 167 | 235 | 23 | 10 | 290 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AAA RAW | 2 teams | — | 508 | 435 | 108 | 34 | 2 | 23 | 63 | 101 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 248 | 347 | 494 | 842 | 246 | 267 | 20 | 12 | 365 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 520 | 457 | 102 | 29 | 1 | 19 | 50 | 127 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 223 | 309 | 416 | 725 | 193 | 262 | 24 | 10 | 320 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AAA RAW | 2 teams | — | 520 | 437 | 112 | 32 | 1 | 25 | 70 | 108 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 256 | 368 | 506 | 873 | 249 | 281 | 21 | 13 | 380 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MLB MLE | Cleveland Guardians | — | 531 | 472 | 110 | 19 | 2 | 27 | 46 | 135 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 233 | 312 | 453 | 765 | 220 | 263 | 25 | 9 | 335 | 113 | +8 | +0 | -4 | -9 | +12 | 0.7 |
| 2025 | 25 | MLB RAW | Cleveland Guardians | — | 531 | 470 | 110 | 19 | 2 | 27 | 48 | 135 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 234 | 316 | 455 | 771 | 221 | 265 | 25 | 9 | 338 | 113 | +8 | +0 | -4 | -9 | +12 | 0.7 |
| 2026 | 26 | MLB MLE | 2 teams | — | 521 | 462 | 101 | 19 | 1 | 17 | 48 | 162 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 219 | 300 | 374 | 675 | 156 | 292 | 31 | 9 | 302 | 90 | -6 | +0 | +0 | -9 | +11 | -0.4 |
| 2026 | 26 | MLB RAW | 2 teams | — | 521 | 457 | 108 | 22 | 1 | 18 | 53 | 154 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 236 | 324 | 407 | 731 | 171 | 310 | 30 | 10 | 325 | 90 | -6 | +0 | +0 | -9 | +11 | -0.4 |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 50 | 45 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 267 | 340 | 489 | 829 | 222 | 284 | 18 | 4 | 331 | 110 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 397 | 354 | 95 | 21 | 1 | 20 | 36 | 83 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 268 | 349 | 503 | 852 | 234 | 283 | 21 | 9 | 369 | 136 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 508 | 451 | 91 | 28 | 1 | 15 | 49 | 118 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 202 | 285 | 368 | 654 | 166 | 231 | 23 | 10 | 290 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 520 | 458 | 102 | 29 | 1 | 19 | 50 | 127 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 223 | 309 | 415 | 724 | 192 | 259 | 24 | 10 | 320 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MLB MLE | Cleveland Guardians | — | 531 | 472 | 110 | 19 | 2 | 27 | 46 | 135 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 233 | 312 | 453 | 765 | 220 | 265 | 25 | 9 | 335 | 113 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MLB MLE | 2 teams | — | 521 | 462 | 101 | 19 | 1 | 17 | 48 | 162 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 219 | 300 | 374 | 675 | 156 | 292 | 31 | 9 | 302 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 24 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 520 | 458 | 102 | 29 | 1 | 19 | 50 | 127 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 223 | 309 | 415 | 724 | 192 | 259 | 24 | 10 | 320 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MLB MLE | Cleveland Guardians | — | 531 | 472 | 110 | 19 | 2 | 27 | 46 | 135 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 233 | 312 | 453 | 765 | 220 | 265 | 25 | 9 | 335 | 113 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MLB MLE | 2 teams | — | 521 | 462 | 101 | 19 | 1 | 17 | 48 | 162 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 219 | 300 | 374 | 675 | 156 | 292 | 31 | 9 | 302 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB MLE | CLE | 100% | 527 | 467 | 100 | 19 | 2 | 20 | 48 | 147 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 212 | 295 | 388 | 683 | 176 | 260 | 28 | 9 | 304 | 92 | -5 | +0 | +1 | -9 | +11 | 0.1 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB CTX | CLE | 100% | 391 | 347 | 74 | 14 | 1 | 15 | 36 | 109 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 213 | 295 | 388 | 683 | 175 | 261 | 28 | 9 | 304 | 92 | -4 | +0 | +1 | -7 | +8 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | CLE | 65% | 444 | 395 | 82 | 16 | 1 | 16 | 40 | 125 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 210 | 293 | 383 | 676 | 173 | 259 | 28 | 9 | 301 | 90 | -5 | -0 | +0 | -8 | +10 | -0.4 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | CLE | 65% | 289 | 257 | 55 | 11 | 1 | 11 | 26 | 81 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 211 | 293 | 383 | 676 | 172 | 259 | 28 | 9 | 301 | 90 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -5 | +6 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 1332 | 1184 | 266 | 52 | 4 | 56 | 119 | 371 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 225 | 306 | 417 | 723 | 193 | 274 | 28 | 9 | 319 | 100 | +3 | +0 | -4 | -33 | +29 | -0.5 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 578 | 129 | 25 | 2 | 27 | 58 | 181 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 223 | 303 | 413 | 717 | 190 | 273 | 28 | 9 | 319 | 100 | +1 | +0 | -2 | -16 | +14 | -0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3362 | 2974 | 667 | 150 | 8 | 131 | 307 | 868 | 42 | 11 | 5 | 224 | 306 | 412 | 718 | 188 | 266 | 26 | 9 | 317 | 100 | -3 | +0 | -3 | -43 | +41 | -0.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 575 | 129 | 29 | 2 | 25 | 59 | 168 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 224 | 305 | 412 | 717 | 188 | 267 | 26 | 9 | 317 | 100 | -1 | +0 | -1 | -15 | +14 | -0.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAColumbus Clippers · 165 PAwOBA .357 → .286 (−71)K% 24.2% → 29.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.24% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | — | — | 29.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.30% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.018 | 7.24% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.018 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.86% | ÷1.000 | ×0.930 | ×0.950 | ×1.018 | 20.56% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.43% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×1.018 | 9.17% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | ×0.950 | ×1.018 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.018 | 3.39% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .357 → .286; ISO .186 → .140; BABIP .350 → .299. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAColumbus Clippers · 364 PAwOBA .404 → .326 (−78)K% 18.4% → 23.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.41% | ÷0.939 | ×1.200 | — | — | 23.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 16.21% | ÷1.036 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.048 | 11.31% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.65% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.048 | 1.62% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.44% | ÷0.977 | ×0.930 | ×0.956 | ×1.048 | 15.68% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.89% | ÷0.985 | ×0.830 | ×0.956 | ×1.048 | 7.50% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.44% | ÷0.900 | ×0.970 | ×0.956 | ×1.048 | 0.48% |
| Home runs /BIP | 8.89% | ÷1.060 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.048 | 6.15% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 95, 2B 97, 3B 80, K 88, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.956.
Result: wOBA .404 → .326; ISO .281 → .213; BABIP .276 → .246. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAAColumbus Clippers · 405 PAwOBA .354 → .290 (−64)K% 19.5% → 23.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.51% | ÷1.008 | ×1.200 | — | — | 23.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.33% | ÷0.994 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.050 | 9.71% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.49% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.050 | 0.49% |
| Singles /BIP | 14.39% | ÷0.963 | ×0.930 | ×0.950 | ×1.050 | 13.87% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.23% | ÷1.018 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×1.050 | 8.32% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.38% | ÷0.900 | ×0.970 | ×0.950 | ×1.050 | 0.41% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.44% | ÷1.037 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.050 | 4.56% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 93, 2B 104, 3B 80, K 102, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .354 → .290; ISO .233 → .179; BABIP .261 → .231. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 275 PAwOBA .452 → .363 (−89)K% 16.7% → 21.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.73% | ÷1.002 | ×1.310 | — | — | 21.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 16.36% | ÷1.038 | ×0.600 | — | ×1.012 | 9.57% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.36% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.012 | 0.28% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.35% | ÷1.011 | ×0.870 | ×0.989 | ×1.012 | 19.24% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.94% | ÷1.079 | ×0.780 | ×0.989 | ×1.012 | 6.46% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.56% | ÷0.900 | ×0.850 | ×0.989 | ×1.012 | 0.53% |
| Home runs /BIP | 9.50% | ÷1.020 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.012 | 8.29% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 102, 2B 116, 3B 80, K 100, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.989.
Result: wOBA .452 → .363; ISO .307 → .270; BABIP .343 → .279. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 122 PAwOBA .422 → .382 (−40)K% 15.6% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.57% | ÷1.032 | ×1.220 | — | — | 18.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.66% | ÷0.984 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.042 | 7.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.46% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×1.042 | 2.15% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.25% | ÷1.001 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.042 | 19.33% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.50% | ÷1.090 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×1.042 | 10.33% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.955 | ×0.880 | ×0.950 | ×1.042 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.25% | ÷0.970 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.042 | 5.37% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 100, 2B 118, 3B 91, K 106, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 24.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .422 → .382; ISO .253 → .234; BABIP .333 → .292. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Rays · 50 PAwOBA .444 → .331 (−113)K% 12.0% → 17.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.00% | ÷1.005 | ×1.440 | — | — | 17.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.00% | ÷0.999 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 4.89% |
| HBP% /PA | 6.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 4.26% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.62% | ÷0.990 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.985 | 17.63% |
| Doubles /BIP | 13.51% | ÷1.006 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 9.52% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.065 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.41% | ÷0.948 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 4.38% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 98, 2B 101, 3B 113, K 101, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .444 → .331; ISO .256 → .194; BABIP .371 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .