Nate Nankil

OF Lansing Lugnuts
Age 24 R/R 6'2" / 210 lbs A+ HR -5% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2036
Overview
A+PROSPECTMiLBFA 2037
ETA2030MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202421A+/AOAK475.303/.407/.45811391—.248/.335/.364
202522AA/A+OAK535.278/.362/.36531057—.219/.285/.283
202623AA/A+/AOAK405.241/.339/.3477560—.210/.287/.289
2027PROJMLE24MLBOAK1.229/.296/.3140070-0.0
2028PROJ22% MLB25MLBOAK55.232/.300/.3301175-0.1
2029PROJ35% MLB26MLBOAK103.234/.303/.3402178-0.1
Next 3 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2036Service0.0First FA2037
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029MiLB2030MiLB2031Ext$0.9M2032Ext$0.9M2033Ext$0.9M2034Ext$3M+2
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2026 AA
K%88
Chase%66
Whiff%57
wOBA55
wRC+48
ISO40
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 99%
CompsDante Bichette Jr. (age 24) · Danny Mendick (age 24) · Tim Kennelly (age 24)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONstats below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+†70
AVG/OBP/SLG.229 / .296 / .314
PA1
HR0
K%21
BB%7
BABIP286
ISO79
MLB%0%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -7.5 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-8BATRUN: -0.0 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)-0RUNFLD: +0.1 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)+0FLDPOS: -1.3 runs (Positional adjustment)-1POSREP: +4.5 runs (Replacement-level credit)+5REPTotal WAR: -0.30-0.3WAR
trajectory · projected WAR by year
-0.3-0.1-0.1-0.1272830
Contract
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2031
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2036
First FA Year   2037
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2031
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2031
2029MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2031
2030MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2031
2031Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2032Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2033Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2034Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2035Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2036Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $0.0M $0.0M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202320 ROKACL Athletics — 5853 10300 590 10 189259245504 57227 169 236 -2 — — — — — —
202421 A+Lansing Lugnuts — 116104 37701 8253 01 356417452869 96456 227 389 91 — — — — — —
202421 AStockton Ports — 359298 8520110 446415 32 285403460863 174332 1812 386 91 — — — — — —
202522 AAMidland RockHounds — 166152 37710 11323 32 243307303610 59308 197 281 37 — — — — — —
202522 A+Lansing Lugnuts — 369316 931923 385310 71 294387396783 101340 1410 353 66 — — — — — —
202623 AAMidland RockHounds — 10291 25303 8172 10 275347407753 132306 178 337 85 — — — — — —
202623 A+Lansing Lugnuts — 198167 35513 26373 21 210327305632 96252 1913 294 45 — — — — — —
202623 AStockton Ports — 10591 24601 10173 20 264356363718 99311 1610 327 65 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202320 ROK MLEACL Athletics — 5855 8200 3130 10 145190182371 36183 225 165 -2 — — — — — —
202421 A+ MLELansing Lugnuts — 116106 30501 6333 01 283339358698 75383 285 303 91 — — — — — —
202421 A MLEStockton Ports — 359312 741717 308615 32 237333365699 128293 248 302 91 — — — — — —
202522 AA MLEMidland RockHounds — 166156 32510 7403 32 205253250503 45269 244 223 37 — — — — — —
202522 A+ MLELansing Lugnuts — 369329 741313 256910 71 225299298597 73265 197 266 66 — — — — — —
202623 AA MLEMidland RockHounds — 10293 24302 6212 10 258317355672 97293 216 294 85 — — — — — —
202623 A+ MLELansing Lugnuts — 198175 31412 18473 21 177265246511 69226 249 235 45 — — — — — —
202623 A MLEStockton Ports — 10594 21501 7233 20 223298309607 85278 227 265 65 — — — — — —
202320 ROK MLEACL Athletics — 5855 8200 3130 10 145190182371 36190 225 165 -2 — — — — — —
202320 ROK RAWACL Athletics — 5853 10300 590 10 189259245504 57227 169 236 -2 — — — — — —
202421 A MLE2 teams — 475418 1032218 3611818 33 246333361694 115322 258 302 91 — — — — — —
202421 A RAW2 teams — 475402 12227111 528918 33 303407458864 154364 1911 387 91 — — — — — —
202522 A+ MLE2 teams — 535485 1061823 3210913 103 219285282567 64272 206 253 57 — — — — — —
202522 A+ RAW2 teams — 535468 1302633 498513 103 278362365728 88330 169 331 57 — — — — — —
202623 A+ MLE3 teams — 405362 771216 31918 51 213289301590 88266 228 258 61 — — — — — —
202623 A+ RAW3 teams — 405349 841417 44718 51 241339347686 106282 1811 313 61 — — — — — —
202320 ROK MLEACL Athletics — 5855 8200 3130 10 145190182371 36183 225 165 -2 — — — — — —
202421 A MLE2 teams — 475418 1032218 3611818 33 246333361694 115315 258 302 91 — — — — — —
202522 A+ MLE2 teams — 535485 1061823 3210913 103 219285282567 64266 206 253 57 — — — — — —
202623 A+ MLE3 teams — 405363 771216 31918 51 212289300590 88256 228 258 61 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202421 A MLE2 teams — 475418 1032218 3611818 33 246333361694 115315 258 302 91 — — — — — —
202522 A+ MLE2 teams — 535485 1061823 3210913 103 219285282567 64266 206 253 57 — — — — — —
202623 A+ MLE3 teams — 405363 771216 31918 51 212289300590 88256 228 258 61 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202724 MLB MLEOAK 0% 380344 761314 26827 41 222290304594 81277 227 272 70 -14 +0 +0 -2 +8 -0.3
▸ 2027 — real world (MLB)
202724 MLB CTXOAK 0% 11 0000 000 00 229296314610 86286 00 278 70 -0 +0 +0 -0 +0 -0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202825 MLB MLEOAK 22% 250226 52914 18544 31 226295320614 94278 227 279 75 -7 +0 +0 -2 +5 -0.3
202926 MLB MLEOAK 35% 297269 621115 21645 41 228297330627 102279 227 284 78 -8 +0 +0 -2 +6 -0.2
203027 MLB MLEOAK 40% 316285 641115 23685 41 228297331628 103279 227 285 79 -8 +0 +0 -2 +7 -0.3
202825 MLB CTXOAK 22% 5550 11201 4121 10 232300330630 98287 227 286 75 -2 +0 +0 -0 +1 -0.1
202926 MLB CTXOAK 35% 10393 22402 7222 10 234303340642 105287 217 291 78 -3 +0 +0 -1 +2 -0.1
203027 MLB CTXOAK 40% 127115 26502 9282 10 234303341644 107288 227 291 79 -3 +0 +0 -1 +3 -0.1
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 285258 591105 20625 30 229297329626 101280 227 290 71 -7 +1 +0 -2 +6 -0.2
/ 162G— A+C — 650588 13425011 4614111 70 228296327623 99279 227 290 71 -17 +1 +0 -4 +14 -0.5
Career— MLE — 25462290 51492833 17856257 3211 224297315611 90281 227 273 71 -30 +1 +0 -6 +23 -1.2
/ 162G— MLE — 650585 1302328 4514315 83 222295309604 87279 227 273 71 -18 +1 +0 -4 +14 -0.8

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 198 PAwOBA .287 → .235 (−51)K% 18.7% → 23.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA18.69%÷1.000×1.270——23.73%
BB% (unintentional) /PA13.13%÷1.000×0.710—×0.9889.21%
HBP% /PA1.52%—×0.790—×0.9881.18%
Singles /BIP20.00%÷1.000×0.920×1.015×0.98818.44%
Doubles /BIP3.85%÷1.000×0.810×1.015×0.9883.12%
Triples /BIP0.77%÷1.000×0.850×1.015×0.9880.66%
Home runs /BIP2.31%÷1.000×0.800—×0.9881.82%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.015.

Result: wOBA .287 → .235; ISO .096 → .077; BABIP .252 → .226. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 AStockton Ports · 105 PAwOBA .322 → .265 (−57)K% 16.2% → 22.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA16.19%÷1.000×1.360——22.02%
BB% (unintentional) /PA9.52%÷1.000×0.690—×0.9806.44%
HBP% /PA2.86%—×0.780—×0.9802.18%
Singles /BIP22.97%÷1.000×0.920×1.023×0.98021.18%
Doubles /BIP8.11%÷1.000×0.830×1.023×0.9806.74%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.910×1.023×0.9800.00%
Home runs /BIP1.35%÷1.000×0.800—×0.9801.06%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.023.

Result: wOBA .322 → .265; ISO .099 → .079; BABIP .311 → .278. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 AAMidland RockHounds · 102 PAwOBA .331 → .294 (−37)K% 16.7% → 20.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA16.67%÷1.000×1.220——20.33%
BB% (unintentional) /PA7.84%÷1.000×0.700—×1.0125.56%
HBP% /PA1.96%—×0.870—×1.0121.73%
Singles /BIP25.68%÷1.000×0.920×1.050×1.01225.10%
Doubles /BIP4.05%÷1.000×0.840×1.050×1.0123.62%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.940×1.050×1.0120.00%
Home runs /BIP4.05%÷1.000×0.800—×1.0123.28%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .331 → .294; ISO .132 → .109; BABIP .306 → .293. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 369 PAwOBA .348 → .266 (−82)K% 14.4% → 18.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA14.36%÷0.969×1.270——18.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA10.03%÷1.048×0.710—×0.9986.78%
HBP% /PA2.71%—×0.790—×0.9982.14%
Singles /BIP26.24%÷1.078×0.920×0.962×0.99821.50%
Doubles /BIP7.22%÷1.199×0.810×0.962×0.9984.69%
Triples /BIP0.76%÷1.150×0.850×0.962×0.9980.54%
Home runs /BIP1.14%÷0.921×0.800—×0.9980.99%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 116, 2B 140, 3B 130, K 94, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.962.

Result: wOBA .348 → .266; ISO .101 → .074; BABIP .340 → .265. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 AAMidland RockHounds · 166 PAwOBA .274 → .223 (−52)K% 19.3% → 23.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA19.28%÷0.988×1.220——23.80%
BB% (unintentional) /PA6.63%÷1.078×0.700—×1.0274.42%
HBP% /PA1.81%—×0.870—×1.0271.61%
Singles /BIP24.17%÷1.012×0.920×0.973×1.02721.93%
Doubles /BIP5.83%÷1.131×0.840×0.973×1.0274.33%
Triples /BIP0.83%÷1.150×0.940×0.973×1.0270.68%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷1.043×0.800—×1.0270.00%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 109, 1B 102, 2B 126, 3B 130, K 98, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.973.

Result: wOBA .274 → .223; ISO .059 → .044; BABIP .308 → .269. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AStockton Ports · 359 PAwOBA .379 → .302 (−77)K% 17.8% → 23.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA17.83%÷1.015×1.360——23.88%
BB% (unintentional) /PA12.26%÷1.021×0.690——8.29%
HBP% /PA4.18%—×0.780——3.26%
Singles /BIP23.08%÷1.004×0.920×0.994—21.03%
Doubles /BIP8.55%÷0.979×0.830×0.994—7.20%
Triples /BIP0.43%÷0.900×0.910×0.994—0.43%
Home runs /BIP4.27%÷1.164×0.800——2.94%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 133, 1B 101, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 103, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.994.

Result: wOBA .379 → .302; ISO .174 → .131; BABIP .332 → .293. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 116 PAwOBA .382 → .303 (−79)K% 21.6% → 28.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA21.55%÷0.974×1.270——28.09%
BB% (unintentional) /PA6.90%÷0.974×0.710—×1.0125.09%
HBP% /PA2.59%—×0.790—×1.0122.07%
Singles /BIP36.71%÷1.036×0.920×0.953×1.01231.42%
Doubles /BIP8.86%÷0.992×0.810×0.953×1.0126.98%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.150×0.850×0.953×1.0120.00%
Home runs /BIP1.27%÷0.867×0.800—×1.0121.18%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 107, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 95, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.953.

Result: wOBA .382 → .303; ISO .096 → .076; BABIP .456 → .383. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 ROKACL Athletics · 58 PAwOBA .230 → .165 (−65)K% 15.5% → 21.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA15.52%÷1.018×1.440——21.94%
BB% (unintentional) /PA8.62%÷1.030×0.620—×0.9855.11%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.720—×0.9850.00%
Singles /BIP15.91%÷0.974×0.820×1.029×0.98513.57%
Doubles /BIP6.82%÷1.051×0.720×1.029×0.9854.74%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.149×0.720×1.029×0.9850.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷0.989×0.780—×0.9850.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 95, 2B 110, 3B 130, K 104, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.029.

Result: wOBA .230 → .165; ISO .057 → .038; BABIP .227 → .183. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).