Dante Bichette Jr.

Pos3B

B/TR/R

Born1992-09-26

Age (2027)34

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2019

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2016	23	AATrenton Thund…	427	.243/.344/.373	9	4	80	—	.234/.304/.340
2017	24	AATrenton Thund…	281	.262/.355/.352	4	0	79	—	.247/.312/.322
2019	26	AAWSH	280	.297/.350/.402	2	3	72	—	.255/.292/.331

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2011	18	ROK	GCL Yankees	—	240	196	67	17	3	3	30	41	10	3	3	342	453	505	958	163	410	17	12	421	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	19	A	Charleston RiverDogs	—	522	471	117	24	3	3	44	94	7	3	4	248	322	331	653	83	305	18	8	300	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	20	A	Charleston RiverDogs	—	486	435	93	16	1	11	43	119	6	1	0	214	293	331	624	117	267	24	9	285	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	AA	Trenton Thunder	—	74	67	15	3	0	1	6	11	1	0	0	224	297	313	611	90	255	15	8	281	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	460	402	109	27	1	9	50	90	3	1	3	271	356	410	766	139	325	20	11	342	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	INTL	Scottsdale Scorpions	—	82	73	19	1	0	0	7	18	0	1	1	260	325	274	599	14	333	22	9	274	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	AA	Trenton Thunder	—	271	254	58	11	3	2	13	48	1	0	0	228	269	319	588	91	271	18	5	262	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	171	157	35	7	1	1	12	31	2	0	1	223	287	299	586	76	272	18	7	269	31	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA	Trenton Thunder	—	427	367	89	19	1	9	53	81	4	4	1	243	344	373	718	131	286	19	12	325	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA	Trenton Thunder	—	281	244	64	8	1	4	35	49	0	0	1	262	355	352	707	90	311	17	12	323	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AA	Harrisburg Senators	—	280	256	76	13	4	2	19	38	2	3	1	297	350	402	753	105	339	14	7	334	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2011	18	ROK MLE	GCL Yankees	—	240	207	54	13	2	2	19	59	10	3	3	261	352	372	724	111	334	25	8	318	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	19	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	522	487	111	20	3	2	28	129	7	3	4	228	280	294	573	66	304	25	5	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	20	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	486	448	82	13	1	9	30	156	6	1	0	183	244	277	521	94	253	32	6	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	74	68	15	3	0	1	5	13	1	0	0	221	284	309	593	88	265	18	7	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	460	413	97	25	1	8	39	134	3	1	3	235	305	358	664	123	316	29	8	293	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	271	258	57	10	3	1	9	62	1	0	0	221	250	295	545	74	277	23	3	238	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	171	160	29	6	1	1	9	43	2	0	1	181	234	250	484	69	240	25	5	214	31	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	427	385	90	18	1	7	35	99	4	4	1	234	304	340	645	106	290	23	8	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	281	255	63	8	1	3	24	59	0	0	1	247	312	322	633	75	305	21	9	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AA MLE	Harrisburg Senators	—	280	263	67	11	3	1	12	46	2	3	1	255	292	331	623	76	299	16	4	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	18	ROK MLE	GCL Yankees	—	240	207	54	13	2	2	19	59	10	3	3	261	352	372	724	111	347	25	8	318	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	18	ROK RAW	GCL Yankees	—	240	196	67	17	3	3	30	41	10	3	3	342	453	505	958	163	410	17	12	421	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	19	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	522	487	111	20	3	2	28	129	7	3	4	228	280	294	573	66	306	25	5	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	19	A RAW	Charleston RiverDogs	—	522	471	117	24	3	3	44	94	7	3	4	248	322	331	653	83	305	18	8	300	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	20	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	486	448	82	13	1	9	30	156	6	1	0	183	244	277	521	94	256	32	6	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	20	A RAW	Charleston RiverDogs	—	486	435	93	16	1	11	43	119	6	1	0	214	293	331	624	117	267	24	9	285	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	616	555	130	32	1	11	50	170	4	2	4	234	302	355	657	121	312	28	8	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	A+ RAW	3 teams	—	616	542	143	31	1	10	63	119	4	2	4	264	345	380	725	116	317	19	10	326	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	AA MLE	2 teams	—	442	418	85	16	3	2	18	105	3	0	1	203	241	270	512	67	264	24	4	229	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	AA RAW	2 teams	—	442	411	93	18	4	3	25	79	3	0	1	226	276	311	587	85	271	18	6	265	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	427	385	90	18	1	7	35	99	4	4	1	234	304	340	645	106	294	23	8	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA RAW	Trenton Thunder	—	427	367	89	19	1	9	53	81	4	4	1	243	344	373	718	131	286	19	12	325	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	281	255	63	8	1	3	24	59	0	0	1	247	312	322	633	75	308	21	9	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA RAW	Trenton Thunder	—	281	244	64	8	1	4	35	49	0	0	1	262	355	352	707	90	311	17	12	323	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AA MLE	Harrisburg Senators	—	280	263	67	11	3	1	12	46	2	3	1	255	292	331	623	76	303	16	4	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AA RAW	Harrisburg Senators	—	280	256	76	13	4	2	19	38	2	3	1	297	350	402	753	105	339	14	7	334	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	18	ROK MLE	GCL Yankees	—	240	209	54	13	2	2	19	59	10	3	3	258	352	368	720	110	334	25	8	318	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	19	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	522	482	111	20	3	2	28	129	7	3	4	230	280	297	576	66	304	25	5	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	20	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	486	447	82	13	1	9	30	156	6	1	0	183	244	277	521	94	253	32	6	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	616	557	130	32	1	11	50	170	4	2	4	233	302	354	656	120	309	28	8	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	AA MLE	2 teams	—	442	418	85	16	3	2	18	105	3	0	1	203	241	270	512	67	263	24	4	229	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	427	385	90	18	1	7	35	99	4	4	1	234	304	340	645	106	290	23	8	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	281	255	63	8	1	3	24	59	0	0	1	247	312	322	633	75	305	21	9	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AA MLE	Harrisburg Senators	—	280	264	67	11	3	1	12	46	2	3	1	254	292	330	622	76	299	16	4	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	3294	3018	682	131	15	37	216	823	36	16	15	226	286	316	602	90	296	25	7	267	67	-130	-3	+0	+12	+71	-5.1
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	596	134	26	3	7	43	162	7	3	3	225	285	314	599	89	294	25	7	267	67	-26	-1	+0	+2	+14	-1.0

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AAHarrisburg Senators · 280 PAwOBA .328 → .275 (−53)K% 13.6% → 16.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.57%	÷0.996	×1.220	—	—	16.63%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.79%	÷1.054	×0.700	—	×0.978	4.41%
HBP% /PA	0.71%	—	×0.850	—	×0.978	0.59%
Singles /BIP	26.15%	÷0.991	×0.970	×0.950	×0.978	23.78%
Doubles /BIP	5.96%	÷0.985	×0.860	×0.950	×0.978	4.84%
Triples /BIP	1.83%	÷1.150	×0.950	×0.950	×0.978	1.41%
Home runs /BIP	0.92%	÷1.111	×0.780	—	×0.978	0.63%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 122, 1B 98, 2B 97, 3B 130, K 99, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .328 → .275; ISO .105 → .082; BABIP .339 → .299. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AATrenton Thunder · 281 PAwOBA .316 → .285 (−31)K% 17.4% → 21.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.44%	÷1.007	×1.220	—	—	21.13%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.10%	÷0.979	×0.700	—	×0.998	8.64%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	0.00%
Singles /BIP	26.15%	÷1.020	×0.970	×1.043	×0.998	25.90%
Doubles /BIP	4.10%	÷0.936	×0.860	×1.043	×0.998	3.92%
Triples /BIP	0.51%	÷1.150	×0.950	×1.043	×0.998	0.44%
Home runs /BIP	2.05%	÷0.960	×0.780	—	×0.998	1.66%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 92, 1B 104, 2B 87, 3B 130, K 101, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.043.

Result: wOBA .316 → .285; ISO .090 → .079; BABIP .311 → .305. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AATrenton Thunder · 427 PAwOBA .320 → .286 (−34)K% 19.0% → 23.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.97%	÷0.997	×1.220	—	—	23.21%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.41%	÷1.061	×0.700	—	×1.012	8.29%
HBP% /PA	0.94%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	0.81%
Singles /BIP	20.98%	÷0.981	×0.970	×1.048	×1.012	22.00%
Doubles /BIP	6.64%	÷0.962	×0.860	×1.048	×1.012	6.30%
Triples /BIP	0.35%	÷1.039	×0.950	×1.048	×1.012	0.34%
Home runs /BIP	3.15%	÷1.015	×0.780	—	×1.012	2.45%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 96, 2B 92, 3B 108, K 99, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.048.

Result: wOBA .320 → .286; ISO .131 → .113; BABIP .286 → .290. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AATrenton Thunder · 271 PAwOBA .258 → .238 (−19)K% 17.7% → 22.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.71%	÷0.950	×1.220	—	—	22.74%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.80%	÷1.067	×0.700	—	×1.027	3.23%
HBP% /PA	0.37%	—	×0.850	—	×1.027	0.32%
Singles /BIP	20.39%	÷0.977	×0.970	×1.041	×1.027	21.64%
Doubles /BIP	5.34%	÷0.978	×0.860	×1.041	×1.027	5.02%
Triples /BIP	1.46%	÷1.150	×0.950	×1.041	×1.027	1.29%
Home runs /BIP	0.97%	÷1.153	×0.780	—	×1.027	0.67%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 131, 1B 95, 2B 96, 3B 130, K 90, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.041.

Result: wOBA .258 → .238; ISO .091 → .076; BABIP .271 → .277. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+Tampa Yankees · 171 PAwOBA .263 → .214 (−49)K% 18.1% → 25.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.13%	÷1.016	×1.420	—	—	25.34%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.02%	÷1.015	×0.750	—	×0.998	5.18%
HBP% /PA	1.17%	—	×0.930	—	×0.998	1.09%
Singles /BIP	20.63%	÷1.046	×0.920	×1.001	×0.998	18.13%
Doubles /BIP	5.56%	÷1.044	×0.960	×1.001	×0.998	5.10%
Triples /BIP	0.79%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.001	×0.998	0.56%
Home runs /BIP	0.79%	÷0.832	×0.880	—	×0.998	0.84%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 66, 1B 109, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 103, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.001.

Result: wOBA .263 → .214; ISO .076 → .065; BABIP .272 → .240. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 A+Tampa Yankees · 460 PAwOBA .337 → .293 (−44)K% 19.6% → 29.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.57%	÷0.950	×1.420	—	—	29.23%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.87%	÷0.978	×0.750	—	×1.012	8.43%
HBP% /PA	0.65%	—	×0.930	—	×1.012	0.61%
Singles /BIP	23.08%	÷1.019	×0.920	×1.050	×1.012	22.15%
Doubles /BIP	8.65%	÷1.003	×0.960	×1.050	×1.012	8.80%
Triples /BIP	0.32%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.050	×1.012	0.31%
Home runs /BIP	2.88%	÷0.882	×0.880	—	×1.012	2.91%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 104, 2B 101, 3B 80, K 90, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .337 → .293; ISO .139 → .128; BABIP .325 → .316. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AATrenton Thunder · 74 PAwOBA .274 → .259 (−15)K% 14.9% → 18.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.86%	÷0.994	×1.220	—	—	18.24%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.11%	÷0.977	×0.700	—	×1.042	6.05%
HBP% /PA	1.35%	—	×0.850	—	×1.042	1.20%
Singles /BIP	19.64%	÷1.000	×0.970	×1.050	×1.042	20.85%
Doubles /BIP	5.36%	÷0.972	×0.860	×1.050	×1.042	5.19%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.950	×1.050	×1.042	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.79%	÷0.910	×0.780	—	×1.042	1.60%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 82, 1B 100, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 99, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 24.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .274 → .259; ISO .090 → .082; BABIP .255 → .265. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 ACharleston RiverDogs · 486 PAwOBA .278 → .231 (−47)K% 24.5% → 32.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.49%	÷1.019	×1.340	—	—	32.20%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.64%	÷0.956	×0.660	—	×1.015	6.05%
HBP% /PA	1.23%	—	×0.770	—	×1.015	0.96%
Singles /BIP	20.57%	÷0.988	×0.920	×1.023	×1.015	19.89%
Doubles /BIP	5.06%	÷0.946	×0.820	×1.023	×1.015	4.56%
Triples /BIP	0.32%	÷1.038	×0.940	×1.023	×1.015	0.30%
Home runs /BIP	3.48%	÷0.951	×0.820	—	×1.015	3.05%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 98, 2B 89, 3B 108, K 104, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.023.

Result: wOBA .278 → .231; ISO .117 → .097; BABIP .267 → .253. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .