Richard Fitts
P Memphis Redbirds| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 28 | 27 | 137 | 3.80 | 4.11 | 20.8% | 7.6% | 2.1 | K 18.1% · BB 7.0% · FIP 4.45 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX3 levels | 18 | 17 | 75 | 4.44 | 4.65 | 20.8% | 8.4% | 0.7 | K 19.8% · BB 8.3% · FIP 4.87 |
| 2026 | 26 | AAASTL | 3 | 3 | 15 | 1.76 | 2.84 | 17.7% | 9.7% | — | K 15.3% · BB 8.7% · FIP 2.91 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBSTL | 12 | 12 | 75 | 4.68 | 4.83 | 19.2% | 8.9% | 0.5 | |
| 2028PROJ64% MLB | 28 | MLBSTL | 12 | 12 | 69 | 4.63 | 4.72 | 19.3% | 8.9% | 0.4 | |
| 2029PROJ74% MLB | 29 | MLBSTL | 10 | 10 | 57 | 4.73 | 4.83 | 18.9% | 9.0% | 0.3 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 22 | 112 | 445 | 131 | 20 | 14 | 100% | 5.1 | 22.0% | 5.3% | 16.8% | 4.0% | 3.70 | 4.09 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 22 | 22 | 112 | 445 | 131 | 20 | 14 | 100% | 5.1 | 29.4% | 4.5% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 3.70 | 2.92 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AA MLE | Somerset Patriots | 27 | 27 | 153 | 629 | 163 | 43 | 22 | 100% | 5.7 | 21.0% | 7.5% | 13.5% | 4.1% | 3.48 | 4.51 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AA RAW | Somerset Patriots | 27 | 27 | 153 | 629 | 163 | 43 | 22 | 100% | 5.7 | 25.9% | 6.8% | 19.1% | 3.5% | 3.48 | 3.68 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 27 | 137 | 577 | 120 | 44 | 19 | 96% | 4.9 | 18.1% | 7.0% | 11.1% | 3.6% | 3.80 | 4.45 | +1.5 |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 27 | 137 | 577 | 120 | 44 | 19 | 96% | 4.9 | 18.1% | 7.0% | 11.1% | 3.6% | 3.80 | 4.45 | +1.5 |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 28 | 27 | 137 | 577 | 120 | 44 | 19 | 96% | 4.9 | 20.8% | 7.6% | 13.2% | 3.3% | 3.80 | 4.11 | +2.1 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 18 | 17 | 75 | 322 | 67 | 27 | 13 | 94% | 4.2 | 19.8% | 8.3% | 11.4% | 4.3% | 4.44 | 4.87 | +0.5 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 18 | 17 | 75 | 322 | 67 | 27 | 13 | 94% | 4.2 | 19.8% | 8.3% | 11.4% | 4.3% | 4.44 | 4.87 | +0.5 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 18 | 17 | 75 | 322 | 67 | 27 | 13 | 94% | 4.2 | 20.8% | 8.4% | 12.4% | 4.0% | 4.44 | 4.65 | +0.7 |
| 2026 | 26 | AAA MLE | Memphis Redbirds | 3 | 3 | 15 | 62 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 100% | 5.1 | 15.3% | 8.7% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 1.76 | 2.91 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AAA MLE | Memphis Redbirds | 3 | 3 | 15 | 62 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 100% | 5.1 | 15.3% | 8.7% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 1.76 | 2.91 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AAA RAW | Memphis Redbirds | 3 | 3 | 15 | 62 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 100% | 5.1 | 17.7% | 9.7% | 8.1% | 0.0% | 1.76 | 2.84 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 15 | 14 | 66 | 280 | 49 | 23 | 11 | 93% | 4.4 | 17.5% | 8.2% | 9.3% | 3.9% | 3.97 | 4.84 | +0.4 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | STL | 12 | 12 | 75 | 317 | 61 | 28 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.2% | 8.9% | 10.3% | 3.4% | 4.68 | 4.83 | +0.5 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | STL | 18 | 18 | 108 | 456 | 88 | 41 | 16 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.3% | 8.9% | 10.4% | 3.4% | 4.76 | 4.85 | +0.7 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB MLE | STL | 13 | 13 | 78 | 328 | 62 | 30 | 12 | 100% | 6.0 | 18.9% | 9.0% | 9.9% | 3.5% | 4.87 | 4.97 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB MLE | STL | 10 | 10 | 59 | 250 | 46 | 23 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 18.4% | 9.3% | 9.1% | 3.7% | 5.02 | 5.14 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | STL | 12 | 12 | 69 | 291 | 56 | 26 | 9 | 100% | 5.8 | 19.3% | 8.9% | 10.4% | 3.2% | 4.63 | 4.72 | +0.4 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB CTX | STL | 10 | 10 | 57 | 241 | 46 | 22 | 8 | 100% | 5.7 | 18.9% | 9.0% | 9.9% | 3.3% | 4.73 | 4.83 | +0.3 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB CTX | STL | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 37 | 19 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 18.4% | 9.3% | 9.1% | 3.5% | 4.88 | 5.00 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 44 | 43 | 240 | 1017 | 189 | 90 | 35 | 98% | 5.5 | 18.6% | 8.8% | 9.7% | 3.5% | 4.52 | 4.55 | +2.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 37 | 36 | 200 | 847 | 157 | 75 | 29 | 98% | 5.4 | 18.6% | 8.8% | 9.7% | 3.5% | 4.52 | 4.55 | +2.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 98 | 96 | 492 | 2035 | 408 | 143 | 78 | 98% | 5.0 | 20.0% | 7.0% | 13.0% | 3.8% | 3.71 | 4.41 | +1.7 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 40 | 39 | 200 | 827 | 166 | 58 | 32 | 98% | 5.0 | 20.0% | 7.0% | 13.0% | 3.8% | 3.71 | 4.41 | +1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 15 IPFIP 2.83 → 2.91 (+0.09)K% 17.7% → 15.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.74% | — | ×0.860 | 15.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.68% | — | ×0.900 | 8.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.83 → 2.91, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAWorcester Red Sox · 27 IPFIP 3.43 → 3.67 (+0.25)K% 21.6% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.55% | — | ×0.860 | 18.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.48% | — | ×0.900 | 8.53% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.72% | ÷0.984 | ×1.100 | 1.93% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 3.43 → 3.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAWorcester Red Sox · 117 IPFIP 4.27 → 4.66 (+0.39)K% 22.6% → 19.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.56% | — | ×0.860 | 19.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.52% | — | ×0.900 | 6.77% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.86% | ÷0.996 | ×1.100 | 4.27% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 4.27 → 4.66, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AASomerset Patriots · 153 IPFIP 3.70 → 4.51 (+0.81)K% 25.9% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.91% | — | ×0.810 | 20.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.84% | — | ×1.100 | 7.52% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.50% | ÷1.033 | ×1.200 | 4.06% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 3.70 → 4.51, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ATampa Tarpons · 79 IPFIP 3.54 → 4.87 (+1.33)K% 28.4% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.44% | — | ×0.740 | 21.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.20% | — | ×1.180 | 6.13% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.98% | ÷1.026 | ×1.300 | 5.04% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).
Result: FIP 3.54 → 4.87, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Hudson Valley Renegades · 33 IPFIP 1.17 → 1.95 (+0.78)K% 32.2% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.20% | — | ×0.770 | 24.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.54% | — | ×1.150 | 2.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.85% | ÷1.014 | ×1.250 | 1.04% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 1.17 → 1.95, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.4 | 80 | 18.9% | 8.9% | 1.36 | 4.67 |
| Ross Ohlendorf ('16) | 2.9 | 84 | 17.2% | 8.6% | 1.38 | 4.82 |
| Rich Folkers ('70-'77, -0 WAR*) | 2.1 | 85 | 19.1%* | 8.8%* | 1.35* | 4.91* |
| Mike Willis ('77-'81, 0 WAR*) | 1.5 | 59 | 18.4%* | 9.6%* | 1.45* | 4.77* |
| Bob Priddy ('62-'71, -1 WAR*) | 2.7 | 77 | 16.3%* | 9.0%* | 1.43* | 4.80* |
| Roansy Contreras ('25) | 1.2 | 82 | 19.3% | 9.8% | 1.38 | 4.77 |
| JC Ramírez ('19) | 1.4 | 72 | 16.4% | 8.4% | 1.44 | 4.71 |