Rodolfo Nolasco
LF Richmond Flying Squirrels| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 21 | APIT | 444 | .214/.356/.440 | 20 | 11 | 68 | — | .168/.276/.331 |
| 2024 | 22 | A+SF | 362 | .220/.318/.389 | 12 | 9 | 35 | — | .150/.228/.261 |
| 2025 | 23 | AASF | 32 | .038/.194/.077 | 0 | 0 | -33 | — | .037/.161/.074 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 25 | MLBSF | 2 | .203/.278/.323 | 0 | 0 | 74 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 26 | MLBSF | 44 | .205/.280/.329 | 1 | 1 | 76 | -0.1 |
Tools · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 17 | ROK | DSL Pirates 2 | — | 225 | 199 | 60 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 26 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 302 | 377 | 472 | 849 | 171 | 324 | 12 | 7 | 375 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK | FCL Pirates Gold | — | 164 | 134 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 26 | 43 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 284 | 411 | 552 | 963 | 269 | 357 | 26 | 16 | 418 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A | Bradenton Marauders | — | 321 | 280 | 67 | 15 | 2 | 11 | 37 | 109 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 239 | 332 | 425 | 757 | 186 | 346 | 34 | 12 | 336 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A | Bradenton Marauders | — | 444 | 359 | 77 | 21 | 0 | 20 | 71 | 152 | 8 | 11 | 3 | 214 | 356 | 440 | 796 | 226 | 295 | 34 | 16 | 353 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ | Eugene Emeralds | — | 362 | 314 | 69 | 17 | 0 | 12 | 40 | 135 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 220 | 318 | 389 | 706 | 169 | 335 | 37 | 11 | 317 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA | Richmond Flying Squirrels | — | 32 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 194 | 77 | 270 | 38 | 71 | 41 | 12 | 150 | -33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Pirates 2 | — | 225 | 204 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 32 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 186 | 256 | 275 | 530 | 88 | 200 | 14 | 5 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Pirates Gold | — | 164 | 144 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 61 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 188 | 282 | 361 | 643 | 174 | 272 | 37 | 10 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A MLE | Bradenton Marauders | — | 321 | 292 | 50 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 25 | 149 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 171 | 241 | 291 | 532 | 120 | 304 | 46 | 8 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Bradenton Marauders | — | 444 | 381 | 64 | 17 | 0 | 15 | 49 | 199 | 8 | 11 | 3 | 168 | 276 | 331 | 607 | 163 | 272 | 45 | 11 | 269 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Eugene Emeralds | — | 362 | 326 | 49 | 12 | 0 | 8 | 28 | 188 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 150 | 228 | 261 | 489 | 110 | 304 | 52 | 8 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA MLE | Richmond Flying Squirrels | — | 32 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 161 | 74 | 235 | 37 | 63 | 50 | 9 | 120 | -33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Pirates 2 | — | 225 | 204 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 32 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 186 | 256 | 275 | 530 | 88 | 209 | 14 | 5 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Pirates 2 | — | 225 | 199 | 60 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 26 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 302 | 377 | 472 | 849 | 171 | 324 | 12 | 7 | 375 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Pirates Gold | — | 164 | 144 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 61 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 188 | 282 | 361 | 643 | 174 | 269 | 37 | 10 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Pirates Gold | — | 164 | 134 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 26 | 43 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 284 | 411 | 552 | 963 | 269 | 357 | 26 | 16 | 418 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A MLE | Bradenton Marauders | — | 321 | 292 | 50 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 25 | 149 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 171 | 241 | 291 | 532 | 120 | 312 | 46 | 8 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A RAW | Bradenton Marauders | — | 321 | 280 | 67 | 15 | 2 | 11 | 37 | 109 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 239 | 332 | 425 | 757 | 186 | 346 | 34 | 12 | 336 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Bradenton Marauders | — | 444 | 381 | 64 | 17 | 0 | 15 | 49 | 199 | 8 | 11 | 3 | 168 | 276 | 331 | 607 | 163 | 283 | 45 | 11 | 269 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A RAW | Bradenton Marauders | — | 444 | 359 | 77 | 21 | 0 | 20 | 71 | 152 | 8 | 11 | 3 | 214 | 356 | 440 | 796 | 226 | 295 | 34 | 16 | 353 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Eugene Emeralds | — | 362 | 326 | 49 | 12 | 0 | 8 | 28 | 188 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 150 | 228 | 261 | 489 | 110 | 308 | 52 | 8 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ RAW | Eugene Emeralds | — | 362 | 314 | 69 | 17 | 0 | 12 | 40 | 135 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 220 | 318 | 389 | 706 | 169 | 335 | 37 | 11 | 317 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA MLE | Richmond Flying Squirrels | — | 32 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 161 | 74 | 235 | 37 | 83 | 50 | 9 | 120 | -33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA RAW | Richmond Flying Squirrels | — | 32 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 194 | 77 | 270 | 38 | 71 | 41 | 12 | 150 | -33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Pirates 2 | — | 225 | 204 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 32 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 186 | 256 | 275 | 530 | 88 | 200 | 14 | 5 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Pirates Gold | — | 164 | 144 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 61 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 188 | 282 | 361 | 643 | 174 | 272 | 37 | 10 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | A MLE | Bradenton Marauders | — | 321 | 291 | 50 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 25 | 149 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 172 | 241 | 292 | 533 | 120 | 304 | 46 | 8 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Bradenton Marauders | — | 444 | 384 | 64 | 17 | 0 | 15 | 49 | 199 | 8 | 11 | 3 | 167 | 276 | 328 | 604 | 161 | 272 | 45 | 11 | 269 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Eugene Emeralds | — | 362 | 326 | 49 | 12 | 0 | 8 | 28 | 188 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 150 | 228 | 261 | 489 | 110 | 304 | 52 | 8 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA MLE | Richmond Flying Squirrels | — | 32 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 161 | 71 | 233 | 36 | 63 | 50 | 9 | 120 | -33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Eugene Emeralds | — | 362 | 326 | 49 | 12 | 0 | 8 | 28 | 188 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 150 | 228 | 261 | 489 | 110 | 304 | 52 | 8 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA MLE | Richmond Flying Squirrels | — | 32 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 161 | 71 | 233 | 36 | 63 | 50 | 9 | 120 | -33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB MLE | SF | 2% | 200 | 180 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 61 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 207 | 281 | 332 | 613 | 126 | 282 | 30 | 8 | 277 | 74 | -6 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +4 | -0.1 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB CTX | SF | 2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 203 | 278 | 323 | 601 | 120 | 278 | 50 | 0 | 272 | 74 | -0 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | SF | 31% | 143 | 128 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 43 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 209 | 284 | 339 | 623 | 130 | 282 | 30 | 8 | 281 | 76 | -4 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +3 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | SF | 31% | 44 | 40 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 205 | 280 | 329 | 609 | 124 | 279 | 30 | 9 | 275 | 76 | -1 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 44 | 40 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 200 | 273 | 325 | 598 | 125 | 269 | 30 | 9 | 275 | 54 | -1 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 591 | 119 | 30 | 0 | 15 | 59 | 192 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 201 | 274 | 328 | 602 | 127 | 271 | 30 | 9 | 275 | 54 | -19 | +3 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -0.9 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1775 | 1578 | 271 | 61 | 6 | 43 | 151 | 714 | 30 | 34 | 16 | 172 | 257 | 300 | 557 | 128 | 272 | 40 | 9 | 248 | 54 | -7 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +5 | -0.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 578 | 99 | 22 | 2 | 16 | 55 | 261 | 11 | 12 | 6 | 171 | 256 | 299 | 556 | 128 | 270 | 40 | 8 | 248 | 54 | -19 | +1 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 32 PAwOBA .152 → .120 (−33)K% 40.6% → 48.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 40.62% | ÷1.018 | ×1.220 | — | — | 48.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.50% | ÷0.962 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.012 | 9.21% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.12% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 2.69% |
| Singles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.004 | ×0.970 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷0.992 | ×0.860 | — | ×1.012 | 6.75% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.950 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.183 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 137, 1B 101, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 104, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .152 → .120; ISO .038 → .033; BABIP .071 → .063. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Eugene Emeralds · 362 PAwOBA .311 → .220 (−91)K% 37.3% → 52.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 37.29% | ÷0.968 | ×1.350 | — | — | 52.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.05% | ÷1.024 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 7.64% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.38% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.998 | 1.12% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.35% | ÷1.016 | ×0.910 | ×1.040 | ×0.998 | 20.77% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.50% | ÷0.950 | ×0.830 | ×1.040 | ×0.998 | 8.61% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.820 | ×1.040 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.70% | ÷1.010 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.998 | 5.50% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 103, 2B 90, 3B 130, K 94, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.040.
Result: wOBA .311 → .220; ISO .169 → .114; BABIP .335 → .304. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ABradenton Marauders · 444 PAwOBA .349 → .269 (−79)K% 34.2% → 44.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.23% | ÷1.037 | ×1.360 | — | — | 44.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.99% | ÷0.994 | ×0.690 | — | — | 11.10% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.80% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 1.41% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.39% | ÷0.958 | ×0.920 | ×1.012 | — | 16.89% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.14% | ÷0.949 | ×0.830 | ×1.012 | — | 8.98% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.012 | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 9.66% | ÷0.971 | ×0.800 | — | — | 7.96% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 92, 2B 90, 3B 130, K 107, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.012.
Result: wOBA .349 → .269; ISO .226 → .173; BABIP .295 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ABradenton Marauders · 321 PAwOBA .330 → .234 (−95)K% 34.0% → 46.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 33.96% | ÷0.996 | ×1.360 | — | — | 46.35% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.53% | ÷1.015 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 7.95% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.62% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.49% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.81% | ÷0.999 | ×0.920 | ×1.001 | ×1.015 | 21.33% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.77% | ÷1.082 | ×0.830 | ×1.001 | ×1.015 | 6.83% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.17% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×1.001 | ×1.015 | 1.20% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.43% | ÷1.111 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 4.70% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 122, 1B 100, 2B 116, 3B 80, K 99, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.001.
Result: wOBA .330 → .234; ISO .186 → .121; BABIP .346 → .304. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Pirates Gold · 164 PAwOBA .410 → .287 (−123)K% 26.2% → 37.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.22% | ÷1.014 | ×1.440 | — | — | 37.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.85% | ÷0.982 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 9.96% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.83% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 1.31% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.98% | ÷0.986 | ×0.820 | ×0.998 | ×0.995 | 18.16% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.79% | ÷1.039 | ×0.720 | ×0.998 | ×0.995 | 6.05% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.20% | ÷1.132 | ×0.720 | ×0.998 | ×0.995 | 1.39% |
| Home runs /BIP | 8.79% | ÷0.946 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 7.21% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 97, 2B 108, 3B 126, K 103, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.998.
Result: wOBA .410 → .287; ISO .269 → .192; BABIP .357 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 DSLDSL Pirates 2 · 225 PAwOBA .368 → .232 (−136)K% 11.6% → 14.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.56% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 14.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 5.02% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.56% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 2.51% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.54% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 14.67% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.51% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 4.32% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.73% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 1.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.89% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 1.37% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .368 → .232; ISO .171 → .092; BABIP .324 → .200. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).