Justin Stransky
C South Bend Cubs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22 | ACHC | 51 | .163/.265/.186 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | .133/.204/.156 |
| 2026 | 23 | A+CHC | 312 | .209/.343/.331 | 6 | 11 | 57 | — | .178/.278/.275 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 24 | MLBCHC | 1 | .221/.303/.333 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 25 | MLBCHC | 72 | .223/.305/.339 | 1 | 1 | 82 | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ55% MLB | 26 | MLBCHC | 135 | .224/.305/.343 | 2 | 3 | 84 | 0.3 |
Tools · ContractCON 50 / POW 37
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 51 | 43 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 163 | 265 | 186 | 451 | 23 | 212 | 24 | 12 | 214 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ | South Bend Cubs | — | 312 | 254 | 53 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 46 | 50 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 209 | 343 | 331 | 674 | 122 | 230 | 16 | 15 | 309 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 51 | 45 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 133 | 204 | 156 | 360 | 22 | 193 | 33 | 8 | 170 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 312 | 269 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 31 | 64 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 178 | 278 | 275 | 553 | 97 | 202 | 21 | 10 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 51 | 45 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 133 | 204 | 156 | 360 | 22 | 200 | 33 | 8 | 170 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A RAW | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 51 | 43 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 163 | 265 | 186 | 451 | 23 | 212 | 24 | 12 | 214 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 312 | 269 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 31 | 64 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 178 | 278 | 275 | 553 | 97 | 209 | 21 | 10 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ RAW | South Bend Cubs | — | 312 | 254 | 53 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 46 | 50 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 209 | 343 | 331 | 674 | 122 | 230 | 16 | 15 | 309 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 51 | 47 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 128 | 204 | 149 | 353 | 21 | 193 | 33 | 8 | 170 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 312 | 272 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 31 | 64 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 176 | 278 | 272 | 550 | 96 | 202 | 21 | 10 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 51 | 47 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 128 | 204 | 149 | 353 | 21 | 193 | 33 | 8 | 170 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 312 | 272 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 31 | 64 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 176 | 278 | 272 | 550 | 96 | 202 | 21 | 10 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB MLE | CHC | 0% | 362 | 322 | 71 | 14 | 2 | 6 | 33 | 85 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 219 | 301 | 330 | 631 | 111 | 276 | 23 | 9 | 287 | 80 | -8 | +1 | +0 | +6 | +8 | 0.4 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB CTX | CHC | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 221 | 303 | 333 | 636 | 112 | 279 | 0 | 0 | 289 | 80 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | CHC | 38% | 189 | 168 | 37 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 44 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 221 | 303 | 337 | 639 | 116 | 277 | 23 | 9 | 290 | 82 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +4 | 0.4 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | CHC | 55% | 244 | 216 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 57 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 222 | 304 | 340 | 644 | 118 | 278 | 23 | 9 | 292 | 84 | -5 | +1 | +0 | +4 | +5 | 0.6 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | CHC | 61% | 278 | 247 | 55 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 26 | 65 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 222 | 304 | 341 | 645 | 119 | 278 | 23 | 9 | 292 | 84 | -5 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +6 | 0.6 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | CHC | 65% | 297 | 265 | 58 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 27 | 70 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 222 | 302 | 340 | 642 | 118 | 277 | 24 | 9 | 291 | 83 | -6 | +1 | -1 | +5 | +6 | 0.6 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | CHC | 64% | 301 | 268 | 59 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 27 | 72 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 220 | 300 | 337 | 637 | 117 | 277 | 24 | 9 | 289 | 82 | -7 | +1 | -1 | +5 | +7 | 0.5 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | CHC | 64% | 301 | 268 | 57 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 27 | 73 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 217 | 297 | 329 | 626 | 112 | 275 | 24 | 9 | 284 | 78 | -8 | +0 | -2 | +5 | +7 | 0.3 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB MLE | CHC | 64% | 274 | 245 | 52 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 24 | 67 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 213 | 292 | 319 | 611 | 106 | 272 | 24 | 9 | 278 | 74 | -8 | -0 | -3 | +5 | +6 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | CHC | 38% | 72 | 64 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 223 | 305 | 339 | 644 | 116 | 280 | 24 | 10 | 292 | 82 | -2 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +2 | 0.2 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | CHC | 55% | 135 | 120 | 26 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 32 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 224 | 305 | 343 | 648 | 119 | 281 | 24 | 9 | 293 | 84 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +3 | 0.3 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | CHC | 61% | 171 | 151 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 40 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 224 | 305 | 344 | 649 | 120 | 281 | 23 | 9 | 294 | 84 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +4 | 0.4 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | CHC | 65% | 192 | 170 | 39 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 45 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 223 | 304 | 342 | 646 | 119 | 281 | 23 | 9 | 292 | 83 | -4 | +0 | -0 | +3 | +4 | 0.4 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | CHC | 64% | 194 | 172 | 39 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 46 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 222 | 302 | 339 | 641 | 117 | 280 | 24 | 9 | 290 | 82 | -4 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +4 | 0.3 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | CHC | 64% | 194 | 172 | 37 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 47 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 219 | 298 | 331 | 629 | 112 | 278 | 24 | 9 | 286 | 78 | -5 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +4 | 0.2 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB CTX | CHC | 64% | 176 | 156 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 43 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 215 | 293 | 321 | 614 | 107 | 274 | 24 | 9 | 279 | 74 | -5 | +0 | -2 | +3 | +4 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 1134 | 1005 | 223 | 45 | 6 | 20 | 105 | 270 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 222 | 304 | 338 | 642 | 116 | 282 | 24 | 9 | 289 | 76 | -26 | +1 | -5 | +20 | +25 | 1.6 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 576 | 127 | 26 | 3 | 11 | 60 | 155 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 220 | 301 | 333 | 635 | 113 | 281 | 24 | 9 | 289 | 76 | -15 | +1 | -3 | +12 | +14 | 0.9 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2410 | 2136 | 452 | 86 | 9 | 43 | 221 | 567 | 28 | 47 | 10 | 212 | 294 | 321 | 615 | 109 | 265 | 24 | 9 | 281 | 76 | -47 | +3 | -7 | +37 | +44 | 3.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 576 | 122 | 23 | 2 | 12 | 60 | 153 | 8 | 13 | 3 | 212 | 295 | 321 | 617 | 109 | 264 | 24 | 9 | 281 | 76 | -15 | +1 | -2 | +12 | +14 | 1.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+South Bend Cubs · 312 PAwOBA .305 → .252 (−53)K% 16.0% → 20.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.03% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 20.35% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.10% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 9.89% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.92% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 1.50% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.16% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.000 | ×0.988 | 15.60% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.39% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.000 | ×0.988 | 4.32% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.000 | ×0.988 | 0.41% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.94% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 2.32% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.000.
Result: wOBA .305 → .252; ISO .122 → .102; BABIP .230 → .202. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans · 51 PAwOBA .218 → .170 (−48)K% 23.5% → 33.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.53% | ÷0.956 | ×1.360 | — | — | 33.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.76% | ÷1.106 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 7.27% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.35% | ÷0.990 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.990 | 17.82% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.23% | ÷0.968 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.990 | 2.74% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.925 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 98, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 91, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .218 → .170; ISO .023 → .019; BABIP .212 → .193. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).