Noah Ruen

P Great Lakes Loons

Age 24 RHP 6'4" / 190 lbs A+

Overview

A+PROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2023	20	MIX2 levels	11	1	13	2.70	2.05	24.5%	7.5%	—	K 17.8% · BB 9.4% · FIP 2.80
2024	21	ALAA	42	0	55	4.45	3.32	20.9%	8.7%	—	K 15.5% · BB 10.3% · FIP 4.14
2025	22	A+LAD	14	0	14	9.88	8.08	17.9%	24.4%	—	K 13.8% · BB 28.0% · FIP 8.14
2027PROJ	24	MLBLAD	13	0	14	5.43	5.43	19.4%	15.2%	-0.1
2028PROJ43% MLB	25	MLBLAD	9	0	9	5.19	5.11	20.4%	13.4%	-0.1

Next 2 projected WAR -0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsFrancisco Del Rosario (age 25) · Grayson Thurman (age 24) · Michael Blazek (age 24)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 136128vR 120

ERA5.43

FIP5.43

K%19.4%

BB%15.2%

K-BB%4.2%

Proj IP14

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 14 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†4550

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2023	20	MIX MLE	2 levels	11	1	13	53	13	4	0	9%	1.2	17.8%	9.4%	8.3%	0.0%	2.70	2.80	—
2023	20	MIX RAW	2 levels	11	1	13	53	13	4	0	9%	1.2	24.5%	7.5%	17.0%	0.0%	2.70	2.05	—
2024	21	A MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	42	0	55	253	53	22	4	0%	1.3	15.5%	10.3%	5.2%	1.9%	4.45	4.14	—
2024	21	A MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	42	0	55	253	53	22	4	0%	1.3	15.5%	10.3%	5.2%	1.9%	4.45	4.14	—
2024	21	A RAW	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	42	0	55	253	53	22	4	0%	1.3	20.9%	8.7%	12.3%	1.6%	4.45	3.32	—
2025	22	A+ MLE	Great Lakes Loons	14	0	14	78	14	19	3	0%	1.0	13.8%	28.0%	-14.2%	4.8%	9.88	8.14	—
2025	22	A+ MLE	Great Lakes Loons	14	0	14	78	14	19	3	0%	1.0	13.8%	28.0%	-14.2%	4.8%	9.88	8.14	—
2025	22	A+ RAW	Great Lakes Loons	14	0	14	78	14	19	3	0%	1.0	17.9%	24.4%	-6.4%	3.8%	9.88	8.08	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	24	MLB	LAD	13	0	14	59	11	9	2	0%	1.1	19.4%	15.2%	4.2%	3.0%	5.43	5.43	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	25	MLB MLE	LAD	19	0	20	84	17	11	3	0%	1.1	20.4%	13.4%	7.0%	3.0%	5.19	5.11	-0.1
2028	25	MLB CTX	LAD	9	0	9	38	8	5	1	0%	1.0	20.4%	13.4%	7.0%	3.0%	5.19	5.11	-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		8	0	9	36	7	5	1	0%	1.1	20.4%	13.4%	7.0%	3.0%	5.19	4.73	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	163	116	23	0%	1.1	20.4%	13.4%	7.0%	3.0%	5.19	4.73	-0.4
Career	—	MLE		67	1	82	384	59	53	9	1%	1.2	15.5%	13.8%	1.7%	2.2%	5.07	4.77	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		164	2	200	940	146	129	21	1%	1.2	15.5%	13.8%	1.7%	2.2%	5.07	4.77	-1.3

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Noah Ruen (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.43	19.4%	15.2%	3.0%	—	5.11	20.4%	7.0%	20	-0.32	—	—	—
Francisco Del Rosario R 2006 · 5.13 FIP	25	SU	5.13	19.4%	13.0%	3.7%	.290	3.93	19.7%	10.3%	26	-1.20	3.93	194	89
Grayson Thurman R 2023 · 4.63 FIP	24	SU	4.63	19.5%	14.1%	2.5%	.319	4.85	19.9%	10.5%	87	+0.22	4.58	132	88
Michael Blazek R 2013 · 5.52 FIP	24	SU	5.52	16.7%	15.5%	3.4%	.241	3.81	19.8%	10.3%	97	-1.71	2.99	238	88
Cody Scroggins R 2021 · 5.35 FIP	24	SU	5.35	17.4%	15.1%	3.3%	.263	4.28	18.6%	4.4%	59	-1.07	3.78	108	87
Chad Harville R 2003 · 5.17 FIP	26	SU	5.17	17.3%	15.4%	2.9%	.328	4.84	17.6%	6.5%	142	-0.33	4.51	178	86
Bryce McGowan R 2024 · 5.11 FIP	24	SU	5.11	19.8%	14.3%	3.4%	.304	3.71	18.8%	6.7%	55	-1.40	3.71	178	86
Hunter Parsons R 2021 · 5.38 FIP	24	SU	5.38	21.4%	15.3%	3.9%	.247	4.78	21.8%	10.2%	115	-0.60	4.73	183	86
Tanner Duncan R 2019 · 5.37 FIP	24	SU	5.37	17.5%	14.8%	3.4%	.301	—	—	—	—	—	3.28	123	85
Michael Perez R 2024 · 5.44 FIP	21	SU	5.44	18.3%	16.1%	3.4%	.296	4.65	23.4%	7.7%	132	-0.79	4.38	153	85
Morgan McSweeney R 2022 · 5.16 FIP	24	SU	5.16	18.0%	13.9%	3.3%	.278	4.31	16.6%	6.6%	107	-0.85	3.20	213	85
Carson Hobbs R 2024 · 5.63 FIP	22	SU	5.63	18.9%	13.6%	4.4%	.303	3.97	22.0%	10.4%	118	-1.66	3.54	143	85
Craig Schlitter R 2016 · 4.53 FIP	24	SU	4.53	22.7%	15.4%	2.5%	.298	4.67	14.7%	4.2%	171	+0.14	4.25	222	85
Kevin Kopps R 2022 · 4.56 FIP	25	SU	4.56	20.2%	15.1%	2.3%	.278	4.40	16.3%	4.0%	182	-0.16	3.45	237	85
Cayne Ueckert R 2019 · 4.26 FIP	23	SU	4.26	17.5%	14.9%	1.4%	.306	5.92	22.7%	5.0%	78	+1.66	3.95	205	85
Zane Russell R 2024 · 4.95 FIP	24	SU	4.95	22.7%	18.3%	2.6%	.314	5.36	18.2%	6.7%	71	+0.41	4.63	108	85
Michael Bowden R 2011 · 4.93 FIP	24	SU	4.93	18.9%	12.2%	3.4%	.271	4.22	17.1%	8.1%	77	-0.71	3.21	269	85
Maikel Cleto R 2014 · 4.24 FIP	25	SU	4.24	23.2%	15.2%	2.1%	.256	3.45	25.4%	14.5%	106	-0.79	2.59	185	85
Julio Mateo R 2002 · 4.54 FIP	24	SU	4.54	16.0%	12.8%	2.1%	.277	4.23	17.5%	13.8%	232	-0.31	3.42	318	84
Billy Seidl R 2024 · 4.53 FIP	24	SU	4.53	18.3%	14.2%	2.2%	.250	—	—	—	—	—	3.34	102	84
Hudson Leach R 2024 · 5.37 FIP	22	SU	5.37	20.5%	20.0%	2.7%	.261	4.54	20.9%	3.1%	71	-0.83	2.77	101	84