Hunter Parsons
P Binghamton Rumble Ponies| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 37 | 0 | 56 | 4.82 | 4.17 | 26.8% | 10.2% | — | K 22.5% · BB 10.0% · FIP 4.84 | |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 10 | 1 | 12 | 8.25 | 6.18 | 32.8% | 20.7% | — | K 32.8% · BB 20.7% · FIP 5.79 | |
| 2025 | 28 | AANYM | 22 | 0 | 29 | 4.91 | 5.42 | 31.5% | 15.0% | — | K 25.5% · BB 16.5% · FIP 6.70 | |
| 2026 | 29 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 30 | MLBNYM | — | — | 0 | 4.90 | 4.90 | 24.5% | 13.4% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 31 | MLBNYM | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4.96 | 5.04 | 24.0% | 13.3% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 1 | 49 | 213 | 66 | 26 | 5 | 4% | 1.8 | 21.4% | 15.3% | 6.1% | 3.9% | 4.01 | 5.38 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 28 | 1 | 49 | 213 | 66 | 26 | 5 | 4% | 1.8 | 31.0% | 12.2% | 18.8% | 2.3% | 4.01 | 3.32 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 36 | 1 | 59 | 253 | 67 | 30 | 6 | 3% | 1.6 | 21.1% | 13.1% | 7.9% | 3.2% | 4.14 | 4.73 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 36 | 1 | 59 | 253 | 67 | 30 | 6 | 3% | 1.6 | 26.5% | 11.9% | 14.6% | 2.4% | 4.14 | 3.68 | — |
| 2023 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 37 | 0 | 56 | 246 | 66 | 25 | 9 | 0% | 1.5 | 22.5% | 10.0% | 12.5% | 4.3% | 4.82 | 4.84 | — |
| 2023 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 37 | 0 | 56 | 246 | 66 | 25 | 9 | 0% | 1.5 | 26.8% | 10.2% | 16.7% | 3.7% | 4.82 | 4.17 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 10 | 1 | 12 | 58 | 19 | 12 | 3 | 10% | 1.2 | 32.8% | 20.7% | 12.1% | 5.2% | 8.25 | 5.79 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 10 | 1 | 12 | 58 | 19 | 12 | 3 | 10% | 1.2 | 32.8% | 20.7% | 12.1% | 5.2% | 8.25 | 5.79 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 10 | 1 | 12 | 58 | 19 | 12 | 3 | 10% | 1.2 | 32.8% | 20.7% | 12.1% | 5.2% | 8.25 | 6.18 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | 22 | 0 | 29 | 127 | 40 | 19 | 7 | 0% | 1.3 | 25.5% | 16.5% | 9.1% | 6.7% | 4.91 | 6.70 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | 22 | 0 | 29 | 127 | 40 | 19 | 7 | 0% | 1.3 | 25.5% | 16.5% | 9.1% | 6.7% | 4.91 | 6.70 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AA RAW | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | 22 | 0 | 29 | 127 | 40 | 19 | 7 | 0% | 1.3 | 31.5% | 15.0% | 16.5% | 5.5% | 4.91 | 5.42 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 30 | MLB | NYM | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.5% | 13.4% | 11.2% | 3.3% | 4.90 | 4.90 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 31 | MLB MLE | NYM | 17 | 0 | 17 | 73 | 18 | 10 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 24.0% | 13.3% | 10.7% | 3.5% | 4.96 | 5.04 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 31 | MLB CTX | NYM | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 24.0% | 13.3% | 10.7% | 3.5% | 4.96 | 5.04 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 5 | 23 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.0% | 13.3% | 10.7% | 3.5% | 4.96 | 4.66 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 220 | 110 | 37 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.0% | 13.3% | 10.7% | 3.5% | 4.96 | 4.66 | -0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 133 | 3 | 205 | 897 | 206 | 123 | 39 | 2% | 1.5 | 22.9% | 13.7% | 9.2% | 4.3% | 4.65 | 5.26 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 130 | 3 | 200 | 874 | 200 | 120 | 38 | 2% | 1.5 | 22.9% | 13.7% | 9.2% | 4.3% | 4.65 | 5.26 | -1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 29 IPFIP 5.36 → 6.70 (+1.34)K% 31.5% → 25.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.50% | — | ×0.810 | 25.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.96% | — | ×1.100 | 16.46% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.51% | ÷0.990 | ×1.200 | 6.68% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 5.36 → 6.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAASyracuse Mets · 7 IPFIP 5.28 → 5.39 (+0.12)K% 30.3% → 26.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.30% | — | ×0.860 | 26.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 24.24% | — | ×0.900 | 21.82% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.03% | ÷1.059 | ×1.100 | 3.15% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 5.28 → 5.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 5 IPFIP 6.48 → 9.18 (+2.71)K% 36.0% → 29.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.00% | — | ×0.810 | 29.16% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.00% | — | ×1.100 | 17.60% |
| HR / BF /BF | 8.00% | ÷0.834 | ×1.200 | 11.51% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 67).
Result: FIP 6.48 → 9.18, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAASyracuse Mets · 32 IPFIP 4.07 → 4.42 (+0.36)K% 25.7% → 22.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.68% | — | ×0.860 | 22.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.14% | — | ×0.900 | 9.12% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.38% | ÷1.003 | ×1.100 | 3.71% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 4.07 → 4.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 24 IPFIP 4.22 → 5.47 (+1.25)K% 28.6% → 23.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.57% | — | ×0.810 | 23.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.20% | — | ×1.100 | 11.22% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.08% | ÷0.925 | ×1.200 | 5.30% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 4.22 → 5.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 39 IPFIP 4.51 → 5.60 (+1.10)K% 23.7% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.73% | — | ×0.810 | 19.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.69% | — | ×1.100 | 16.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.82% | ÷0.895 | ×1.200 | 3.79% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 79).
Result: FIP 4.51 → 5.60, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Brooklyn Cyclones · 20 IPFIP 1.71 → 2.70 (+0.99)K% 32.9% → 25.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.89% | — | ×0.770 | 25.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.26% | — | ×1.150 | 6.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.32% | ÷0.925 | ×1.250 | 1.78% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 1.71 → 2.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Brooklyn Cyclones · 39 IPFIP 4.03 → 5.38 (+1.35)K% 27.7% → 21.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.75% | — | ×0.770 | 21.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.29% | — | ×1.150 | 15.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.89% | ÷0.925 | ×1.250 | 3.91% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 4.03 → 5.38, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).