Jorge Luna

P FCL Yankees

Age 22 RHP 6'0" / 165 lbs ROK peak 0.1 · 2028

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2024	19	ROKDSL NYY Yanke…	12	10	42	3.64	2.89	28.2%	9.9%	—	K 19.2% · BB 12.4% · FIP 4.39
2026	21	ROKNYY	15	0	16	5.17	3.99	14.5%	15.8%	—	K 9.8% · BB 19.7% · FIP 4.77
2027PROJ	22	MLBNYY	11	0	12	5.29	5.29	20.2%	15.0%	-0.1
2028PROJ49% MLB	23	MLBNYY	10	0	10	5.03	4.93	21.3%	13.1%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 0 / P90 0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 98%

CompsJuan Mendez (age 22) · Trayson Kubo (age 21) · Joey Matulovich (age 22)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 134126vR 117

ERA5.29

FIP5.29

K%20.2%

BB%15.0%

K-BB%5.1%

Proj IP12

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 12 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5050

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2023	18	ROK MLE	DSL NYY Yankees	11	11	38	172	31	27	3	100%	3.4	12.3%	19.6%	-7.4%	1.4%	6.45	5.33	—
2023	18	ROK RAW	DSL NYY Yankees	11	11	38	172	31	27	3	100%	3.4	18.0%	15.7%	2.3%	1.7%	6.45	4.64	—
2024	19	ROK MLE	DSL NYY Yankees	12	10	42	181	51	18	3	83%	3.5	19.2%	12.4%	6.7%	2.4%	3.64	4.39	—
2024	19	ROK MLE	DSL NYY Yankees	12	10	42	181	51	18	3	83%	3.5	19.2%	12.4%	6.7%	2.4%	3.64	4.39	—
2024	19	ROK RAW	DSL NYY Yankees	12	10	42	181	51	18	3	83%	3.5	28.2%	9.9%	18.2%	1.7%	3.64	2.89	—
2026	21	ROK MLE	FCL Yankees	15	0	16	76	11	12	0	0%	1.0	9.8%	19.7%	-9.9%	0.0%	5.17	4.77	—
2026	21	ROK MLE	FCL Yankees	15	0	16	76	11	12	0	0%	1.0	9.8%	19.7%	-9.9%	0.0%	5.17	4.77	—
2026	21	ROK RAW	FCL Yankees	15	0	16	76	11	12	0	0%	1.0	14.5%	15.8%	-1.3%	0.0%	5.17	3.99	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	22	MLB	NYY	11	0	12	51	10	8	1	0%	1.1	20.2%	15.0%	5.1%	2.9%	5.29	5.29	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	23	MLB MLE	NYY	19	0	20	84	18	11	2	0%	1.1	21.3%	13.1%	8.2%	2.9%	5.03	4.93	-0.1
2028	23	MLB CTX	NYY	10	0	10	42	9	6	1	0%	1.0	21.3%	13.1%	8.2%	2.9%	5.03	4.93	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		9	0	10	42	9	5	1	0%	1.1	21.3%	13.1%	8.2%	2.9%	5.03	4.55	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	183	102	20	0%	1.1	21.3%	13.1%	8.2%	2.9%	5.03	4.55	+0.0
Career	—	MLE		38	21	95	429	63	71	7	55%	2.5	14.7%	16.6%	-1.9%	1.6%	5.00	4.83	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		80	44	200	900	133	149	14	55%	2.5	14.7%	16.6%	-1.9%	1.6%	5.00	4.83	-0.1

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Jorge Luna (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.29	20.2%	15.0%	2.9%	—	4.93	21.3%	8.2%	20	-0.36	—	—	—
Juan Mendez R 2021 · 4.45 FIP	22	SW	4.45	20.5%	14.2%	2.3%	.271	5.07	21.9%	6.1%	128	+0.62	3.69	156	92
Trayson Kubo R 2019 · 5.01 FIP	21	SW	5.01	19.8%	15.6%	2.9%	.450	4.82	17.7%	1.4%	66	-0.19	4.48	107	83
Joey Matulovich R 2019 · 5.52 FIP	22	SW	5.52	19.8%	14.6%	4.1%	.378	5.04	20.5%	8.9%	133	-0.48	3.22	201	82
Victor Simeon R 2023 · 5.53 FIP	22	SW	5.53	20.3%	15.7%	3.9%	.333	3.87	25.6%	5.4%	81	-1.66	3.22	180	82
Radhames Liz R 2007 · 5.07 FIP	23	SW	5.07	19.7%	18.0%	2.5%	.301	5.66	14.5%	2.3%	84	+0.59	2.81	219	82
Yunior Montero R 2015 · 4.82 FIP	22	SW	4.82	16.9%	14.1%	2.5%	.276	4.58	21.5%	6.2%	91	-0.24	3.65	127	79
Jordan Brink R 2016 · 5.96 FIP	23	SW	5.96	18.3%	19.2%	3.6%	.233	—	—	—	—	—	3.99	132	79
Eiberson Castellano R 2023 · 4.25 FIP	22	SW	4.25	18.3%	14.1%	1.7%	.359	4.06	20.9%	10.6%	251	-0.19	3.67	386	79
Sam Ryan R 2021 · 4.38 FIP	22	SW	4.38	16.4%	14.7%	1.5%	.328	3.85	13.7%	2.9%	49	-0.53	3.80	178	78
Josh White R 2023 · 5.12 FIP	22	SW	5.12	17.7%	13.9%	3.2%	.244	3.15	27.7%	17.2%	182	-1.97	1.84	247	78
Wilian Bormie R 2023 · 5.84 FIP	22	SP-	5.84	21.6%	20.4%	3.6%	.275	4.13	23.2%	9.3%	203	-1.71	3.51	226	78
Trent Fennell R 2018 · 4.48 FIP	22	SP-	4.48	14.5%	12.5%	1.9%	.317	4.46	20.9%	7.5%	89	-0.02	4.08	163	78
Jhoster Baez R 2024 · 4.57 FIP	19	SP-	4.57	17.3%	14.8%	1.9%	.283	5.93	15.9%	-5.0%	73	+1.36	4.57	110	77
Rafael Gonzalez R 2024 · 4.11 FIP	20	SW	4.11	21.8%	16.3%	1.4%	.303	5.08	15.7%	-4.4%	82	+0.97	3.42	162	77
Luis Rujano R 2024 · 4.54 FIP	21	SW	4.54	17.0%	12.3%	2.4%	.361	4.80	17.9%	-0.8%	97	+0.26	4.54	203	76
Alec Barger R 2021 · 4.55 FIP	23	SW	4.55	21.7%	13.6%	2.8%	.289	4.17	21.3%	9.4%	148	-0.38	3.85	242	76
Cre Finfrock R 2018 · 4.27 FIP	22	SW	4.27	17.9%	16.5%	1.1%	.286	4.63	23.0%	11.3%	38	+0.36	4.27	103	76
Carlton Perkins R 2024 · 4.16 FIP	21	SW	4.16	18.6%	15.7%	1.2%	.356	4.88	18.2%	0.2%	66	+0.72	3.61	124	76
Seth McClung R 2003 · 5.63 FIP	22	SW	5.63	15.0%	14.4%	3.6%	.241	5.29	15.3%	2.8%	212	-0.34	2.52	430	76
Nick Lockhart R 2023 · 4.63 FIP	22	SW	4.63	16.1%	10.6%	2.8%	.274	—	—	—	—	—	4.44	140	76