Sam Ryan
P Wichita Wind Surge| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 24 | A+TOR | 29 | 0 | 49 | 2.76 | 3.32 | 17.7% | 9.4% | — | K 13.7% · BB 10.8% · FIP 3.85 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 44 | 2 | 71 | 4.20 | 3.09 | 23.6% | 10.2% | — | K 18.7% · BB 11.5% · FIP 3.80 |
| 2026 | 27 | AAMIN | 25 | 0 | 38 | 7.34 | 4.78 | 17.6% | 11.5% | — | K 14.2% · BB 12.7% · FIP 5.31 |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBMIN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5.42 | 5.42 | 15.3% | 13.2% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 29 | MLBMIN | 12 | 0 | 13 | 5.39 | 5.44 | 15.9% | 13.0% | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ51% MLB | 30 | MLBMIN | 16 | 0 | 17 | 5.45 | 5.54 | 16.1% | 13.0% | -0.2 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 13 | 2 | 26 | 120 | 24 | 16 | 3 | 15% | 2.0 | 16.4% | 14.7% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 6.15 | 4.38 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 13 | 2 | 26 | 120 | 24 | 16 | 3 | 15% | 2.0 | 20.0% | 13.3% | 6.7% | 2.5% | 6.15 | 4.58 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 15 | 0 | 20 | 90 | 17 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.3 | 18.9% | 15.6% | 3.3% | 4.4% | 5.49 | 5.91 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 15 | 0 | 20 | 90 | 17 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.3 | 18.9% | 15.6% | 3.3% | 4.4% | 5.49 | 6.15 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ MLE | Vancouver Canadians | 29 | 0 | 49 | 203 | 36 | 19 | 2 | 0% | 1.7 | 13.7% | 10.8% | 2.9% | 1.0% | 2.76 | 3.85 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ RAW | Vancouver Canadians | 29 | 0 | 49 | 203 | 36 | 19 | 2 | 0% | 1.7 | 17.7% | 9.4% | 8.4% | 1.0% | 2.76 | 3.32 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 44 | 2 | 71 | 322 | 76 | 33 | 4 | 5% | 1.6 | 18.7% | 11.5% | 7.2% | 1.5% | 4.20 | 3.80 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 44 | 2 | 71 | 322 | 76 | 33 | 4 | 5% | 1.6 | 18.7% | 11.5% | 7.2% | 1.5% | 4.20 | 3.80 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 44 | 2 | 71 | 322 | 76 | 33 | 4 | 5% | 1.6 | 23.6% | 10.2% | 13.4% | 1.2% | 4.20 | 3.09 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA MLE | Wichita Wind Surge | 25 | 0 | 38 | 182 | 32 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 1.5 | 14.2% | 12.7% | 1.5% | 3.3% | 7.34 | 5.31 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA MLE | Wichita Wind Surge | 25 | 0 | 38 | 182 | 32 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 1.5 | 14.2% | 12.7% | 1.5% | 3.3% | 7.34 | 5.31 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA RAW | Wichita Wind Surge | 25 | 0 | 38 | 182 | 32 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 1.5 | 17.6% | 11.5% | 6.0% | 2.7% | 7.34 | 4.78 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | MIN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.3% | 13.2% | 2.1% | 2.9% | 5.42 | 5.42 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIN | 39 | 0 | 41 | 173 | 27 | 22 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.9% | 13.0% | 2.9% | 3.0% | 5.39 | 5.44 | -0.4 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB MLE | MIN | 32 | 0 | 33 | 140 | 23 | 18 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 16.1% | 13.0% | 3.1% | 3.2% | 5.45 | 5.54 | -0.4 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIN | 12 | 0 | 13 | 55 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.9% | 13.0% | 2.9% | 3.0% | 5.39 | 5.44 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB CTX | MIN | 16 | 0 | 17 | 72 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 16.1% | 13.0% | 3.1% | 3.2% | 5.45 | 5.54 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 28 | 0 | 30 | 126 | 20 | 16 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 16.0% | 13.0% | 3.0% | 3.1% | 5.42 | 5.12 | -0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 134 | 107 | 27 | 0% | 1.1 | 16.0% | 13.0% | 3.0% | 3.1% | 5.42 | 5.12 | -1.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 126 | 4 | 204 | 917 | 150 | 113 | 19 | 3% | 1.6 | 16.4% | 12.4% | 4.0% | 2.0% | 4.82 | 4.39 | -0.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 124 | 4 | 200 | 900 | 148 | 111 | 18 | 3% | 1.6 | 16.4% | 12.4% | 4.0% | 2.0% | 4.82 | 4.39 | -2.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAWichita Wind Surge · 38 IPFIP 4.58 → 5.31 (+0.73)K% 17.6% → 14.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.58% | — | ×0.810 | 14.24% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.54% | — | ×1.100 | 12.69% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.75% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 3.30% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.58 → 5.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 41 IPFIP 3.26 → 3.85 (+0.59)K% 21.8% → 17.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.81% | — | ×0.810 | 17.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.17% | — | ×1.100 | 12.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.06% | ÷1.028 | ×1.200 | 1.24% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 106).
Result: FIP 3.26 → 3.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Tri-City Dust Devils · 30 IPFIP 2.85 → 3.73 (+0.88)K% 26.1% → 20.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.12% | — | ×0.770 | 20.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.96% | — | ×1.150 | 10.30% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.49% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 1.87% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.85 → 3.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Vancouver Canadians · 49 IPFIP 3.33 → 3.85 (+0.52)K% 17.7% → 13.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.73% | — | ×0.770 | 13.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.36% | — | ×1.150 | 10.76% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.99% | ÷1.253 | ×1.250 | 0.98% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 151).
Result: FIP 3.33 → 3.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Vancouver Canadians · 7 IPFIP 10.20 → 12.37 (+2.17)K% 9.1% → 7.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 9.09% | — | ×0.770 | 7.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 22.73% | — | ×1.150 | 26.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 9.09% | ÷0.952 | ×1.250 | 11.94% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 10.20 → 12.37, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ADunedin Blue Jays · 6 IPFIP 2.18 → 3.15 (+0.97)K% 30.4% → 22.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.43% | — | ×0.740 | 22.52% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.04% | — | ×1.180 | 15.39% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.916 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 2.18 → 3.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Blue Jays · 6 IPFIP 1.45 → 2.29 (+0.84)K% 26.1% → 17.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.09% | — | ×0.680 | 17.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.35% | — | ×1.250 | 5.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.904 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 81).
Result: FIP 1.45 → 2.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Vancouver Canadians · 21 IPFIP 3.50 → 4.38 (+0.87)K% 21.3% → 16.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.28% | — | ×0.770 | 16.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.77% | — | ×1.150 | 14.68% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.06% | ÷0.909 | ×1.250 | 1.46% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 3.50 → 4.38, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.7 | 44 | 15.7% | 13.1% | 1.16 | 5.42 |
| Matt Anderson ('05) | 1.3 | 51 | 19.3% | 13.5% | 1.05 | 5.19 |
| Mike Mohler ('01) | 2.1 | 60 | 15.0% | 12.4% | 0.97 | 4.99 |
| Richie Lewis ('98) | 1.5 | 59 | 18.1% | 14.1% | 1.38 | 4.88 |
| Gene Harris ('89-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 40 | 20.0%* | 12.5%* | 0.98* | 4.96* |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |
| Daryl Patterson ('68-'74, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 46 | 18.3%* | 11.2%* | 1.27* | 5.03* |