Ramon Suarez

P FCL Blue Jays

Age 23 LHP 5'11" / 156 lbs ROK

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2022	18	ROKTOR	3	7	1.29	1.53	26.9%	3.8%	—	K 26.9% · BB 3.8% · FIP 1.31
2024	20	ROKTOR	14	23	0.79	0.59	42.9%	6.0%	—	K 29.1% · BB 7.4% · FIP 1.58
2026	22	MIX2 levels	17	23	6.17	5.33	28.9%	19.3%	—	K 19.6% · BB 18.8% · FIP 4.89
2027PROJ	23	MLBTOR	10	10	4.99	4.99	22.8%	14.2%	-0.0
2028PROJ43% MLB	24	MLBTOR	9	9	4.79	4.71	23.4%	12.6%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 0 / P90 0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 98%

CompsBrendan Nail (age 23) · Seth Clark (age 23) · Andrew Tomasovich (age 23)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 112120vR 128

ERA4.99

FIP4.99

K%22.8%

BB%14.2%

K-BB%8.6%

Proj IP10

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 10 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2022	18	ROK MLE	DSL Blue Jays	3	0	7	26	7	1	0	0%	2.3	26.9%	3.8%	23.1%	0.0%	1.29	1.31	—
2022	18	ROK RAW	DSL Blue Jays	3	0	7	26	7	1	0	0%	2.3	26.9%	3.8%	23.1%	0.0%	1.29	1.53	—
2024	20	ROK MLE	DSL Blue Jays	14	0	23	84	36	5	0	0%	1.6	29.1%	7.4%	21.7%	0.0%	0.79	1.58	—
2024	20	ROK MLE	DSL Blue Jays	14	0	23	84	36	5	0	0%	1.6	29.1%	7.4%	21.7%	0.0%	0.79	1.58	—
2024	20	ROK RAW	DSL Blue Jays	14	0	23	84	36	5	0	0%	1.6	42.9%	6.0%	36.9%	0.0%	0.79	0.59	—
2026	22	MIX MLE	2 levels	17	0	23	114	33	22	4	0%	1.4	19.6%	18.8%	0.7%	1.9%	6.17	4.89	—
2026	22	MIX MLE	2 levels	17	0	23	114	33	22	4	0%	1.4	19.6%	18.8%	0.7%	1.9%	6.17	4.89	—
2026	22	MIX RAW	2 levels	17	0	23	114	33	22	4	0%	1.4	28.9%	19.3%	9.6%	3.5%	6.17	5.33	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	23	MLB	TOR	10	0	10	42	10	6	1	0%	1.0	22.8%	14.2%	8.6%	3.0%	4.99	4.99	-0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	24	MLB MLE	TOR	20	0	22	91	21	11	3	0%	1.1	23.4%	12.6%	10.8%	2.9%	4.79	4.71	-0.0
2028	24	MLB CTX	TOR	9	0	9	38	9	5	1	0%	1.0	23.4%	12.6%	10.8%	2.9%	4.79	4.71	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		9	0	9	39	9	5	1	0%	1.0	23.4%	12.6%	10.8%	2.9%	4.79	4.33	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	196	109	22	0%	1.1	23.4%	12.6%	10.8%	2.9%	4.79	4.33	+0.5
Career	—	MLE		34	0	53	224	54	29	2	0%	1.6	24.0%	12.8%	11.2%	1.0%	3.23	3.23	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		128	0	200	845	203	108	8	0%	1.6	24.0%	12.8%	11.2%	1.0%	3.23	3.23	-0.4

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Ramon Suarez (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.99	22.8%	14.2%	3.0%	—	4.71	23.4%	10.8%	22	-0.28	—	—	—
Brendan Nail L 2019 · 4.88 FIP	23	SU	4.88	23.8%	16.4%	3.1%	.305	3.83	26.2%	15.2%	87	-1.05	3.45	165	91
Seth Clark L 2023 · 4.23 FIP	23	SU	4.23	22.5%	15.0%	2.1%	.287	5.23	18.4%	0.6%	82	+1.00	4.23	128	87
Andrew Tomasovich L 2017 · 3.99 FIP	23	SU	3.99	21.1%	13.5%	1.8%	.333	4.04	20.3%	6.9%	52	+0.05	3.87	126	85
Hector Mercado L 2000 · 4.79 FIP	26	SU	4.79	21.7%	13.3%	3.3%	.270	4.22	22.9%	10.0%	111	-0.57	3.47	125	84
Andrew Walling L 2023 · 4.20 FIP	23	SU	4.20	23.7%	14.8%	2.2%	.272	3.89	22.1%	8.8%	105	-0.31	3.14	161	84
Will Ohman L 2001 · 4.66 FIP	23	SU	4.66	22.2%	11.1%	3.7%	.353	—	—	—	—	—	2.88	350	84
Keylan Killgore L 2019 · 4.23 FIP	22	SU	4.23	20.7%	12.7%	2.3%	.307	—	—	—	—	—	3.73	161	83
Mitchell Tyranski L 2023 · 5.14 FIP	25	SU	5.14	20.4%	13.6%	3.7%	.269	4.10	20.7%	6.1%	103	-1.04	3.46	145	83
Fred Schlichtholz L 2019 · 4.23 FIP	23	SU	4.23	22.5%	12.8%	2.6%	.368	4.13	18.5%	8.4%	80	-0.10	3.49	175	83
Brian Marconi L 2021 · 3.89 FIP	24	SU	3.89	25.3%	12.3%	2.5%	.265	5.02	20.3%	2.1%	57	+1.13	3.89	101	83
Nick Hagadone L 2012 · 4.74 FIP	26	SU	4.74	22.4%	12.9%	3.5%	.310	3.88	24.6%	14.7%	82	-0.86	2.97	141	82
Brandon Neeck L 2023 · 4.19 FIP	23	SU	4.19	21.0%	13.9%	2.0%	.419	4.24	22.9%	8.7%	176	+0.05	3.24	203	82
Jeff Belge L 2021 · 4.91 FIP	23	SU	4.91	24.0%	18.8%	2.7%	.343	3.68	24.2%	10.4%	131	-1.23	3.30	175	81
Jared Tobey L 2019 · 3.99 FIP	23	SU	3.99	21.0%	12.1%	2.1%	.320	5.43	22.4%	8.2%	73	+1.44	3.99	158	81
Matt Minnick L 2019 · 5.59 FIP	23	SU	5.59	17.2%	14.1%	3.9%	.302	4.67	23.5%	12.1%	105	-0.92	3.81	147	80
Trevor Seidenberger L 2015 · 4.64 FIP	23	SU	4.64	18.1%	14.3%	2.3%	.248	6.29	13.1%	-1.8%	52	+1.65	4.64	101	80
Triston Polley L 2021 · 4.88 FIP	24	SU	4.88	22.3%	20.0%	2.1%	.361	4.77	18.5%	5.2%	136	-0.11	4.15	151	80
Renyel Pinto L 2006 · 4.60 FIP	24	SU	4.60	26.7%	20.0%	2.2%	.246	4.42	21.2%	7.6%	185	-0.18	3.58	231	80
Dillon Larsen L 2022 · 5.90 FIP	24	SU	5.90	21.7%	21.6%	3.5%	.277	4.65	18.0%	-4.1%	91	-1.25	4.04	120	79
Robert Garcia L 2019 · 4.35 FIP	23	SU	4.35	24.0%	11.4%	3.3%	.342	4.38	22.0%	10.4%	106	+0.03	2.21	471	79