Jhoander Irigoyen
C Myrtle Beach Pelicans| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 23 | ACHC | 80 | .222/.291/.264 | 0 | 0 | 20 | — | .176/.228/.203 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 24 | MLBCHC | 200 | .215/.271/.303 | 2 | 1 | 62 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 25 | MLBCHC | 30 | .219/.276/.313 | 0 | 0 | 65 | -0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 26 | MLBCHC | 71 | .220/.278/.319 | 1 | 0 | 67 | 0.0 |
Tools · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 23 | A | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 80 | 72 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 222 | 291 | 264 | 555 | 42 | 271 | 18 | 9 | 256 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 80 | 74 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 176 | 228 | 203 | 431 | 27 | 230 | 24 | 6 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 80 | 74 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 176 | 228 | 203 | 431 | 27 | 232 | 24 | 6 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A RAW | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 80 | 72 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 222 | 291 | 264 | 555 | 42 | 271 | 18 | 9 | 256 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 80 | 75 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 173 | 228 | 200 | 428 | 27 | 230 | 24 | 6 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 23 | A MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 80 | 75 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 173 | 228 | 200 | 428 | 27 | 230 | 24 | 6 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB MLE | CHC | 0% | 200 | 184 | 39 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 55 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 215 | 271 | 303 | 573 | 88 | 289 | 28 | 6 | 260 | 62 | -9 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +4 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | CHC | 30% | 100 | 92 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 217 | 274 | 310 | 584 | 93 | 290 | 27 | 7 | 264 | 65 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +2 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | CHC | 44% | 160 | 147 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 43 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 219 | 276 | 316 | 592 | 97 | 289 | 27 | 7 | 267 | 67 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +3 | 0.0 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | CHC | 49% | 204 | 187 | 41 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 55 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 219 | 277 | 318 | 595 | 99 | 289 | 27 | 7 | 269 | 68 | -8 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +4 | 0.0 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | CHC | 30% | 30 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 219 | 276 | 313 | 589 | 94 | 293 | 27 | 7 | 266 | 65 | -1 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +1 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | CHC | 44% | 71 | 66 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 220 | 278 | 319 | 597 | 98 | 293 | 27 | 7 | 269 | 67 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +2 | 0.0 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | CHC | 49% | 100 | 92 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 221 | 279 | 321 | 600 | 100 | 292 | 27 | 7 | 270 | 68 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +2 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 201 | 186 | 40 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 54 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 215 | 274 | 301 | 575 | 86 | 292 | 27 | 7 | 269 | 60 | -8 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +4 | 0.0 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 601 | 129 | 26 | 3 | 6 | 45 | 175 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 215 | 272 | 298 | 570 | 83 | 293 | 27 | 7 | 269 | 60 | -25 | +0 | +0 | +12 | +14 | 0.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 602 | 554 | 118 | 20 | 3 | 7 | 41 | 160 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 213 | 271 | 298 | 569 | 85 | 285 | 27 | 7 | 257 | 60 | -21 | +0 | +0 | +9 | +11 | -0.0 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 598 | 128 | 22 | 3 | 8 | 44 | 173 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 214 | 271 | 301 | 572 | 87 | 286 | 27 | 7 | 257 | 60 | -26 | +0 | +0 | +12 | +14 | -0.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans · 80 PAwOBA .253 → .198 (−55)K% 17.5% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.50% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 23.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.75% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 5.92% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.41% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.957 | ×0.980 | 19.33% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.17% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.957 | ×0.980 | 4.03% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.957 | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.957.
Result: wOBA .253 → .198; ISO .042 → .031; BABIP .271 → .230. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).