Callan Moss
1B Altoona Curve| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20 | AKC | 80 | .339/.488/.452 | 2 | 3 | 118 | — | .279/.388/.382 |
| 2025 | 21 | A+PIT | 521 | .287/.388/.457 | 13 | 17 | 86 | — | .235/.305/.363 |
| 2026 | 22 | AAPIT | 530 | .266/.342/.400 | 11 | 8 | 82 | — | .248/.306/.359 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 23 | MLBPIT | 4 | .228/.290/.339 | 0 | 0 | 79 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 24 | MLBPIT | 140 | .231/.295/.350 | 3 | 2 | 83 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 50 / POW 45
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 20 | A | Columbia Fireflies | — | 80 | 62 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 339 | 487 | 452 | 939 | 113 | 396 | 15 | 22 | 429 | 118 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A+ | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 521 | 442 | 127 | 30 | 3 | 13 | 65 | 116 | 8 | 17 | 6 | 287 | 388 | 457 | 845 | 170 | 357 | 22 | 12 | 374 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | AA | Altoona Curve | — | 530 | 473 | 126 | 26 | 2 | 11 | 48 | 127 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 266 | 342 | 400 | 741 | 133 | 340 | 24 | 9 | 332 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 20 | A MLE | Columbia Fireflies | — | 80 | 68 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 279 | 388 | 382 | 770 | 103 | 353 | 21 | 15 | 342 | 118 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A+ MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 521 | 468 | 110 | 23 | 2 | 11 | 39 | 153 | 8 | 17 | 6 | 235 | 305 | 363 | 668 | 128 | 315 | 29 | 7 | 296 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | AA MLE | Altoona Curve | — | 530 | 487 | 121 | 23 | 2 | 9 | 34 | 155 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 248 | 306 | 359 | 665 | 111 | 340 | 29 | 6 | 290 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 20 | A MLE | Columbia Fireflies | — | 80 | 68 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 279 | 388 | 382 | 770 | 103 | 347 | 21 | 15 | 342 | 118 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 20 | A RAW | Columbia Fireflies | — | 80 | 62 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 339 | 487 | 452 | 939 | 113 | 396 | 15 | 22 | 429 | 118 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A+ MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 521 | 468 | 110 | 23 | 2 | 11 | 39 | 153 | 8 | 17 | 6 | 235 | 305 | 363 | 668 | 128 | 319 | 29 | 7 | 296 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A+ RAW | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 521 | 442 | 127 | 30 | 3 | 13 | 65 | 116 | 8 | 17 | 6 | 287 | 388 | 457 | 845 | 170 | 357 | 22 | 12 | 374 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | AA MLE | Altoona Curve | — | 530 | 487 | 121 | 23 | 2 | 9 | 34 | 155 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 248 | 306 | 359 | 665 | 111 | 344 | 29 | 6 | 290 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | AA RAW | Altoona Curve | — | 530 | 473 | 126 | 26 | 2 | 11 | 48 | 127 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 266 | 342 | 400 | 741 | 133 | 340 | 24 | 9 | 332 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 20 | A MLE | Columbia Fireflies | — | 80 | 68 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 279 | 388 | 382 | 770 | 103 | 353 | 21 | 15 | 342 | 118 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A+ MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 521 | 469 | 110 | 23 | 2 | 11 | 39 | 153 | 8 | 17 | 6 | 235 | 305 | 362 | 667 | 128 | 315 | 29 | 7 | 296 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | AA MLE | Altoona Curve | — | 530 | 485 | 121 | 23 | 2 | 9 | 34 | 155 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 249 | 306 | 361 | 666 | 111 | 340 | 29 | 6 | 290 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 20 | A MLE | Columbia Fireflies | — | 80 | 68 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 279 | 388 | 382 | 770 | 103 | 353 | 21 | 15 | 342 | 118 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A+ MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 521 | 469 | 110 | 23 | 2 | 11 | 39 | 153 | 8 | 17 | 6 | 235 | 305 | 362 | 667 | 128 | 315 | 29 | 7 | 296 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | AA MLE | Altoona Curve | — | 530 | 485 | 121 | 23 | 2 | 9 | 34 | 155 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 249 | 306 | 361 | 666 | 111 | 340 | 29 | 6 | 290 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB MLE | PIT | 2% | 586 | 534 | 122 | 24 | 2 | 11 | 41 | 160 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 228 | 291 | 342 | 633 | 114 | 301 | 27 | 7 | 285 | 79 | -15 | +1 | +0 | -10 | +13 | -0.3 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB CTX | PIT | 2% | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 228 | 290 | 339 | 630 | 111 | 302 | 25 | 0 | 283 | 79 | -0 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | PIT | 31% | 453 | 412 | 96 | 19 | 2 | 9 | 33 | 121 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 231 | 295 | 353 | 649 | 122 | 302 | 27 | 7 | 291 | 83 | -9 | +1 | +0 | -8 | +10 | -0.7 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | PIT | 31% | 140 | 128 | 30 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 37 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 231 | 295 | 350 | 644 | 119 | 303 | 26 | 7 | 289 | 83 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -3 | +3 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 140 | 128 | 30 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 37 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 234 | 295 | 367 | 662 | 133 | 303 | 26 | 7 | 289 | 85 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -3 | +3 | -0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 594 | 140 | 28 | 5 | 14 | 46 | 172 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 236 | 296 | 370 | 666 | 135 | 305 | 26 | 7 | 289 | 85 | -13 | +0 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -1.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1794 | 1626 | 390 | 75 | 7 | 35 | 133 | 503 | 21 | 39 | 12 | 240 | 306 | 359 | 665 | 119 | 323 | 28 | 7 | 294 | 85 | -14 | +1 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -1.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 589 | 142 | 27 | 3 | 13 | 48 | 182 | 8 | 14 | 4 | 241 | 307 | 363 | 670 | 122 | 324 | 28 | 7 | 294 | 85 | -14 | +1 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAltoona Curve · 530 PAwOBA .326 → .290 (−35)K% 24.0% → 29.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.96% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 29.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.06% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.027 | 6.51% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.13% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.027 | 0.99% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.14% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | ×1.036 | ×1.027 | 25.96% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.51% | ÷1.000 | ×0.860 | ×1.036 | ×1.027 | 6.88% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.58% | ÷1.000 | ×0.950 | ×1.036 | ×1.027 | 0.58% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.18% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.027 | 2.55% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.036.
Result: wOBA .326 → .290; ISO .133 → .111; BABIP .340 → .340. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Greensboro Grasshoppers · 521 PAwOBA .368 → .296 (−72)K% 22.3% → 29.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.26% | ÷0.994 | ×1.310 | — | — | 29.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.09% | ÷0.980 | ×0.600 | — | ×1.012 | 7.49% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.54% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.012 | 1.20% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.85% | ÷0.950 | ×0.870 | ×0.999 | ×1.012 | 23.01% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.20% | ÷0.998 | ×0.780 | ×0.999 | ×1.012 | 7.27% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.92% | ÷1.025 | ×0.850 | ×0.999 | ×1.012 | 0.77% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.99% | ÷1.048 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.012 | 3.39% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 90, 2B 100, 3B 105, K 99, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.
Result: wOBA .368 → .296; ISO .170 → .139; BABIP .357 → .315. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AColumbia Fireflies · 80 PAwOBA .419 → .342 (−77)K% 15.0% → 21.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.00% | ÷0.964 | ×1.360 | — | — | 21.17% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 22.50% | ÷1.028 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 15.33% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 36.00% | ÷1.037 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.015 | 32.41% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.00% | ÷0.935 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.015 | 1.80% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.008 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.00% | ÷1.020 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 3.19% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 107, 2B 87, 3B 102, K 93, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .419 → .342; ISO .113 → .093; BABIP .396 → .353. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).