Camilo Sanchez
P FCL Nationals| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 20 | ROKWSH | 9 | 7 | 31 | 7.92 | 5.51 | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | K 10.0% · BB 18.5% · FIP 6.65 |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX2 levels | 15 | 10 | 52 | 5.68 | 3.92 | 22.0% | 11.5% | — | K 15.2% · BB 14.0% · FIP 5.26 |
| 2026 | 23 | ROKWSH | 14 | 0 | 19 | 7.58 | 5.52 | 20.2% | 11.2% | — | K 13.8% · BB 14.0% · FIP 7.17 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBWSH | — | — | 0 | 5.05 | 5.05 | 20.4% | 12.7% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 25 | MLBWSH | 7 | 0 | 7 | 4.89 | 4.83 | 21.1% | 11.5% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Nationals | 14 | 1 | 24 | 104 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 7% | 1.7 | 13.1% | 6.0% | 7.1% | 1.5% | 4.12 | 3.57 | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Nationals | 14 | 1 | 24 | 104 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 7% | 1.7 | 19.2% | 4.8% | 14.4% | 1.0% | 4.12 | 2.60 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Nationals | 9 | 7 | 31 | 149 | 22 | 22 | 4 | 78% | 3.4 | 10.0% | 18.5% | -8.4% | 3.8% | 7.92 | 6.65 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK RAW | FCL Nationals | 9 | 7 | 31 | 149 | 22 | 22 | 4 | 78% | 3.4 | 14.8% | 14.8% | 0.0% | 2.7% | 7.92 | 5.51 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 15 | 10 | 52 | 227 | 50 | 26 | 5 | 67% | 3.5 | 15.2% | 14.0% | 1.2% | 3.1% | 5.68 | 5.26 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 15 | 10 | 52 | 227 | 50 | 26 | 5 | 67% | 3.5 | 15.2% | 14.0% | 1.2% | 3.1% | 5.68 | 5.26 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 15 | 10 | 52 | 227 | 50 | 26 | 5 | 67% | 3.5 | 22.0% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 2.2% | 5.68 | 3.92 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | ROK MLE | FCL Nationals | 14 | 0 | 19 | 89 | 18 | 10 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 13.8% | 14.0% | -0.3% | 6.3% | 7.58 | 7.17 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | ROK MLE | FCL Nationals | 14 | 0 | 19 | 89 | 18 | 10 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 13.8% | 14.0% | -0.3% | 6.3% | 7.58 | 7.17 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | ROK RAW | FCL Nationals | 14 | 0 | 19 | 89 | 18 | 10 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 20.2% | 11.2% | 9.0% | 4.5% | 7.58 | 5.52 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | WSH | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.4% | 12.7% | 7.7% | 3.1% | 5.05 | 5.05 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | WSH | 15 | 0 | 16 | 66 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.1% | 11.5% | 9.6% | 3.1% | 4.89 | 4.83 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | WSH | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.1% | 11.5% | 9.6% | 3.1% | 4.89 | 4.83 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 7 | 28 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.1% | 11.5% | 9.6% | 3.1% | 4.89 | 4.45 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 180 | 90 | 30 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.1% | 11.5% | 9.6% | 3.1% | 4.89 | 4.45 | +0.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 52 | 18 | 126 | 569 | 75 | 78 | 20 | 35% | 2.4 | 13.2% | 13.7% | -0.5% | 3.5% | 6.21 | 5.62 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 83 | 29 | 200 | 903 | 119 | 124 | 31 | 35% | 2.4 | 13.2% | 13.7% | -0.5% | 3.5% | 6.21 | 5.62 | -0.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKFCL Nationals · 19 IPFIP 5.28 → 7.17 (+1.89)K% 20.2% → 13.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.22% | — | ×0.680 | 13.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.24% | — | ×1.250 | 14.04% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.49% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 6.29% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.28 → 7.17, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Nationals · 43 IPFIP 3.80 → 5.26 (+1.47)K% 22.3% → 15.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.34% | — | ×0.680 | 15.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.17% | — | ×1.250 | 13.96% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.13% | ÷0.975 | ×1.400 | 3.06% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 3.80 → 5.26, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AFredericksburg Nationals · 9 IPFIP 4.40 → 5.43 (+1.03)K% 20.5% → 15.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.51% | — | ×0.740 | 15.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.82% | — | ×1.180 | 15.13% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.56% | ÷1.078 | ×1.300 | 3.09% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).
Result: FIP 4.40 → 5.43, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Nationals · 31 IPFIP 5.20 → 6.65 (+1.46)K% 14.8% → 10.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.77% | — | ×0.680 | 10.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.77% | — | ×1.250 | 18.46% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.68% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 3.76% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.20 → 6.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Nationals · 24 IPFIP 2.61 → 3.57 (+0.96)K% 19.2% → 13.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.23% | — | ×0.680 | 13.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.81% | — | ×1.250 | 6.01% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.96% | ÷0.911 | ×1.400 | 1.48% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 2.61 → 3.57, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).