Peniel Otano
P Hillsboro Hops| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 21 | AARI | 23 | 14 | 83 | 5.86 | 4.23 | 17.4% | 10.8% | — | K 12.9% · BB 12.7% · FIP 5.00 | |
| 2023 | 22 | A+ARI | 39 | 0 | 56 | 6.91 | 3.58 | 22.3% | 15.0% | — | K 17.2% · BB 17.2% · FIP 4.39 | |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 32 | 0 | 37 | 4.42 | 3.70 | 19.1% | 16.9% | — | K 14.4% · BB 19.6% · FIP 4.37 | |
| 2025 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBARI | — | — | 0 | 4.98 | 4.98 | 21.2% | 13.2% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ36% MLB | 27 | MLBARI | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.93 | 4.95 | 21.4% | 12.9% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL D-backs 2 | 14 | 13 | 56 | 236 | 67 | 14 | 2 | 93% | 4.0 | 19.3% | 7.4% | 11.9% | 1.2% | 3.05 | 3.06 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL D-backs 2 | 14 | 13 | 56 | 236 | 67 | 14 | 2 | 93% | 4.0 | 28.4% | 5.9% | 22.5% | 0.8% | 3.05 | 1.92 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A MLE | Visalia Rawhide | 23 | 14 | 83 | 390 | 68 | 42 | 8 | 61% | 3.6 | 12.9% | 12.7% | 0.2% | 2.5% | 5.86 | 5.00 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A RAW | Visalia Rawhide | 23 | 14 | 83 | 390 | 68 | 42 | 8 | 61% | 3.6 | 17.4% | 10.8% | 6.7% | 2.1% | 5.86 | 4.23 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A+ MLE | Hillsboro Hops | 39 | 0 | 56 | 260 | 58 | 39 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 17.2% | 17.2% | -0.1% | 1.0% | 6.91 | 4.39 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A+ RAW | Hillsboro Hops | 39 | 0 | 56 | 260 | 58 | 39 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 22.3% | 15.0% | 7.3% | 0.8% | 6.91 | 3.58 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 32 | 0 | 37 | 178 | 34 | 30 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 14.4% | 19.6% | -5.2% | 0.0% | 4.42 | 4.37 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 32 | 0 | 37 | 178 | 34 | 30 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 14.4% | 19.6% | -5.2% | 0.0% | 4.42 | 4.37 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 32 | 0 | 37 | 178 | 34 | 30 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.1% | 16.9% | 2.2% | 0.0% | 4.42 | 3.70 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | ARI | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.2% | 13.2% | 8.0% | 2.9% | 4.98 | 4.98 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | ARI | 16 | 0 | 17 | 72 | 15 | 9 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.4% | 12.9% | 8.5% | 3.0% | 4.93 | 4.95 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | ARI | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 12.9% | 8.5% | 3.0% | 4.93 | 4.95 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 6 | 26 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 12.9% | 8.5% | 3.0% | 4.93 | 4.57 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 193 | 97 | 32 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.4% | 12.9% | 8.5% | 3.0% | 4.93 | 4.57 | -0.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 108 | 27 | 232 | 1064 | 166 | 147 | 15 | 25% | 2.1 | 15.6% | 13.8% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 5.21 | 4.31 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 93 | 23 | 200 | 919 | 143 | 127 | 13 | 25% | 2.1 | 15.6% | 13.8% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 5.21 | 4.31 | -0.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 A+Hillsboro Hops · 18 IPFIP 4.39 → 5.03 (+0.65)K% 14.1% → 10.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.13% | — | ×0.770 | 10.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.57% | — | ×1.150 | 22.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.875 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 75).
Result: FIP 4.39 → 5.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AVisalia Rawhide · 19 IPFIP 2.81 → 3.66 (+0.85)K% 24.4% → 18.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.42% | — | ×0.740 | 18.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.95% | — | ×1.180 | 16.47% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.102 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 120).
Result: FIP 2.81 → 3.66, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Hillsboro Hops · 56 IPFIP 3.54 → 4.39 (+0.85)K% 22.3% → 17.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.31% | — | ×0.770 | 17.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.00% | — | ×1.150 | 17.25% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.77% | ÷0.952 | ×1.250 | 1.01% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 3.54 → 4.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AVisalia Rawhide · 83 IPFIP 4.12 → 5.00 (+0.88)K% 17.4% → 12.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.44% | — | ×0.740 | 12.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.77% | — | ×1.180 | 12.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.05% | ÷1.062 | ×1.300 | 2.51% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 4.12 → 5.00, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKDSL D-backs 2 · 56 IPFIP 1.92 → 3.06 (+1.14)K% 28.4% → 19.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.39% | — | ×0.680 | 19.31% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.93% | — | ×1.250 | 7.42% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.85% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 1.19% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.92 → 3.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).